Amparo S. Betancourt Tarifa, Marcel Verheij, René Monshouwer, John J. Hermans, Peter J. Koopmans, Erik van der Bijl
{"title":"Real-time tumor tracking for magnetic resonance-guided radiotherapy using label-efficient foundation model adaptation","authors":"Amparo S. Betancourt Tarifa, Marcel Verheij, René Monshouwer, John J. Hermans, Peter J. Koopmans, Erik van der Bijl","doi":"10.1016/j.phro.2026.101078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and Purpose:</h3><div>Real-time tumor tracking on cine magnetic resonance imaging (cine-MRI) enables intra-fraction motion management in magnetic resonance-guided radiotherapy. Pipelines often rely on deformable registration or template matching to propagate contours, which can degrade under non-rigid motion and cine-MRI artifacts. This study evaluated two MedSAM2-based adaptations for real-time tracking with limited labels.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods:</h3><div>The TrackRAD2025 dataset includes sagittal cine-MRI sequences from six institutions acquired on 0.35<!--> <!-->T and 1.5<!--> <!-->T MRI-linear accelerators, with 50 labeled and 477 unlabeled training cases and 50 test cases. Tracking was formulated as frame-wise target segmentation from the first-frame ground-truth mask. Method A fine-tuned MedSAM2 on 40 labeled cases and used rank-weighted checkpoint averaging. Method B combined two MedSAM2 models trained on different labeled splits augmented with pseudo-labels, and merged their predictions during inference.</div></div><div><h3>Results:</h3><div>On the hidden test set, Method A ranked highest on Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), center distance (CD), 95th-percentile Hausdorff distance (HD95), and mean average surface distance (MASD), with DSC = 0.891, CD = 1.47 mm, HD95 = 4.22 mm, MASD = 1.66 mm, relative dose to 98% of the target volume (<span><math><msub><mrow><mi>D</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>98</mn><mtext>%</mtext></mrow></msub></math></span>) = 0.936, and runtime of 0.04 s per frame. Method B achieved similar geometric performance and numerically higher relative <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>D</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>98</mn><mtext>%</mtext></mrow></msub></math></span> (0.953), at 0.10 s per frame. Paired Wilcoxon signed-rank testing showed no significant differences after correction for multiple testing.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions:</h3><div>MedSAM2 adaptation enabled real-time cine-MRI tumor tracking with limited labels. The single-model approach provided faster inference and simpler deployment, while semi-supervised ensembling showed no significant improvement at higher computational cost.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36850,"journal":{"name":"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology","volume":"41 ","pages":"Article 101078"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405631626001788","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and Purpose:
Real-time tumor tracking on cine magnetic resonance imaging (cine-MRI) enables intra-fraction motion management in magnetic resonance-guided radiotherapy. Pipelines often rely on deformable registration or template matching to propagate contours, which can degrade under non-rigid motion and cine-MRI artifacts. This study evaluated two MedSAM2-based adaptations for real-time tracking with limited labels.
Materials and Methods:
The TrackRAD2025 dataset includes sagittal cine-MRI sequences from six institutions acquired on 0.35 T and 1.5 T MRI-linear accelerators, with 50 labeled and 477 unlabeled training cases and 50 test cases. Tracking was formulated as frame-wise target segmentation from the first-frame ground-truth mask. Method A fine-tuned MedSAM2 on 40 labeled cases and used rank-weighted checkpoint averaging. Method B combined two MedSAM2 models trained on different labeled splits augmented with pseudo-labels, and merged their predictions during inference.
Results:
On the hidden test set, Method A ranked highest on Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), center distance (CD), 95th-percentile Hausdorff distance (HD95), and mean average surface distance (MASD), with DSC = 0.891, CD = 1.47 mm, HD95 = 4.22 mm, MASD = 1.66 mm, relative dose to 98% of the target volume () = 0.936, and runtime of 0.04 s per frame. Method B achieved similar geometric performance and numerically higher relative (0.953), at 0.10 s per frame. Paired Wilcoxon signed-rank testing showed no significant differences after correction for multiple testing.
Conclusions:
MedSAM2 adaptation enabled real-time cine-MRI tumor tracking with limited labels. The single-model approach provided faster inference and simpler deployment, while semi-supervised ensembling showed no significant improvement at higher computational cost.