Real-time tumor tracking for magnetic resonance-guided radiotherapy using label-efficient foundation model adaptation

IF 3.2 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Amparo S. Betancourt Tarifa, Marcel Verheij, René Monshouwer, John J. Hermans, Peter J. Koopmans, Erik van der Bijl
{"title":"Real-time tumor tracking for magnetic resonance-guided radiotherapy using label-efficient foundation model adaptation","authors":"Amparo S. Betancourt Tarifa,&nbsp;Marcel Verheij,&nbsp;René Monshouwer,&nbsp;John J. Hermans,&nbsp;Peter J. Koopmans,&nbsp;Erik van der Bijl","doi":"10.1016/j.phro.2026.101078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and Purpose:</h3><div>Real-time tumor tracking on cine magnetic resonance imaging (cine-MRI) enables intra-fraction motion management in magnetic resonance-guided radiotherapy. Pipelines often rely on deformable registration or template matching to propagate contours, which can degrade under non-rigid motion and cine-MRI artifacts. This study evaluated two MedSAM2-based adaptations for real-time tracking with limited labels.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods:</h3><div>The TrackRAD2025 dataset includes sagittal cine-MRI sequences from six institutions acquired on 0.35<!--> <!-->T and 1.5<!--> <!-->T MRI-linear accelerators, with 50 labeled and 477 unlabeled training cases and 50 test cases. Tracking was formulated as frame-wise target segmentation from the first-frame ground-truth mask. Method A fine-tuned MedSAM2 on 40 labeled cases and used rank-weighted checkpoint averaging. Method B combined two MedSAM2 models trained on different labeled splits augmented with pseudo-labels, and merged their predictions during inference.</div></div><div><h3>Results:</h3><div>On the hidden test set, Method A ranked highest on Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), center distance (CD), 95th-percentile Hausdorff distance (HD95), and mean average surface distance (MASD), with DSC = 0.891, CD = 1.47 mm, HD95 = 4.22 mm, MASD = 1.66 mm, relative dose to 98% of the target volume (<span><math><msub><mrow><mi>D</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>98</mn><mtext>%</mtext></mrow></msub></math></span>) = 0.936, and runtime of 0.04 s per frame. Method B achieved similar geometric performance and numerically higher relative <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>D</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>98</mn><mtext>%</mtext></mrow></msub></math></span> (0.953), at 0.10 s per frame. Paired Wilcoxon signed-rank testing showed no significant differences after correction for multiple testing.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions:</h3><div>MedSAM2 adaptation enabled real-time cine-MRI tumor tracking with limited labels. The single-model approach provided faster inference and simpler deployment, while semi-supervised ensembling showed no significant improvement at higher computational cost.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36850,"journal":{"name":"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology","volume":"41 ","pages":"Article 101078"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405631626001788","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Purpose:

Real-time tumor tracking on cine magnetic resonance imaging (cine-MRI) enables intra-fraction motion management in magnetic resonance-guided radiotherapy. Pipelines often rely on deformable registration or template matching to propagate contours, which can degrade under non-rigid motion and cine-MRI artifacts. This study evaluated two MedSAM2-based adaptations for real-time tracking with limited labels.

Materials and Methods:

The TrackRAD2025 dataset includes sagittal cine-MRI sequences from six institutions acquired on 0.35 T and 1.5 T MRI-linear accelerators, with 50 labeled and 477 unlabeled training cases and 50 test cases. Tracking was formulated as frame-wise target segmentation from the first-frame ground-truth mask. Method A fine-tuned MedSAM2 on 40 labeled cases and used rank-weighted checkpoint averaging. Method B combined two MedSAM2 models trained on different labeled splits augmented with pseudo-labels, and merged their predictions during inference.

Results:

On the hidden test set, Method A ranked highest on Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), center distance (CD), 95th-percentile Hausdorff distance (HD95), and mean average surface distance (MASD), with DSC = 0.891, CD = 1.47 mm, HD95 = 4.22 mm, MASD = 1.66 mm, relative dose to 98% of the target volume (D98%) = 0.936, and runtime of 0.04 s per frame. Method B achieved similar geometric performance and numerically higher relative D98% (0.953), at 0.10 s per frame. Paired Wilcoxon signed-rank testing showed no significant differences after correction for multiple testing.

Conclusions:

MedSAM2 adaptation enabled real-time cine-MRI tumor tracking with limited labels. The single-model approach provided faster inference and simpler deployment, while semi-supervised ensembling showed no significant improvement at higher computational cost.
基于标记高效基础模型自适应的磁共振引导放疗实时肿瘤跟踪
背景与目的:基于电影磁共振成像(cine- mri)的实时肿瘤跟踪技术为磁共振引导放射治疗中的分段内运动管理提供了可能。管道通常依赖于可变形的配准或模板匹配来传播轮廓,这在非刚性运动和电影mri伪影下会退化。本研究评估了两种基于medsam2的有限标签实时跟踪适应性。材料和方法:TrackRAD2025数据集包括来自6个机构的矢状面mri序列,分别在0.35 T和1.5 T mri线性加速器上获得,其中有50个标记和477个未标记的训练用例和50个测试用例。跟踪被表述为从第一帧真实掩模开始逐帧分割目标。方法对40例标记病例进行MedSAM2优化,采用秩加权检查点平均法。方法B将两个MedSAM2模型结合在不同的标签分割上进行训练,并增强伪标签,在推理过程中合并它们的预测。结果:在隐藏测试集上,方法A在Dice相似系数(DSC)、中心距离(CD)、第95百分位Hausdorff距离(HD95)和平均表面距离(MASD)上排名最高,DSC = 0.891, CD = 1.47 mm, HD95 = 4.22 mm, MASD = 1.66 mm,相对剂量达到98%靶体积(D98%) = 0.936,每帧运行时间为0.04 s。方法B在每帧0.10 s的速度下获得了类似的几何性能和更高的相对D98%(0.953)。配对Wilcoxon符号秩检验经多重检验校正后无显著差异。结论:MedSAM2适应实现了有限标签的实时电影mri肿瘤跟踪。单模型方法提供了更快的推理和更简单的部署,而半监督集成方法在计算成本较高的情况下没有明显的改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology Physics and Astronomy-Radiation
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
18.90%
发文量
93
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书