A machine learning and MCDM framework for the data-informed sustainable project scheduling and material procurement problem

IF 3.8 Q3 Mathematics
Results in Control and Optimization Pub Date : 2026-09-01 Epub Date: 2026-08-25 DOI:10.1016/j.rico.2026.100803
Mir Mostafa Majidi, Sadegh Sharifi, Mostafa Fazli Jomhour, Ali Heidari, Seyed Mohammad Hossein Orazani
{"title":"A machine learning and MCDM framework for the data-informed sustainable project scheduling and material procurement problem","authors":"Mir Mostafa Majidi,&nbsp;Sadegh Sharifi,&nbsp;Mostafa Fazli Jomhour,&nbsp;Ali Heidari,&nbsp;Seyed Mohammad Hossein Orazani","doi":"10.1016/j.rico.2026.100803","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Construction project performance is strongly influenced by the coordination of scheduling, material procurement, and supplier selection decisions. However, these decisions are often addressed separately, despite their significant interdependence and their joint impact on project cost, completion time, and supply chain sustainability. This study proposes an integrated framework that combines machine learning (ML), multi-criteria decision-making, and multi-objective optimization to support construction project scheduling and supplier selection under material ordering decisions. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to employ ML within integrated project scheduling and material ordering decisions for predicting both activity duration and activity execution cost. In the first stage, ML models are developed to predict activity duration and execution cost based on historical project data, and the results show that XGBoost outperforms Random Forest, achieving <span><math><msup><mrow><mi>R</mi></mrow><mn>2</mn></msup></math></span>values of 0.901 and 0.923, respectively. In the second stage, supplier evaluation is conducted using multiple criteria, including price, lead time, reliability, quality, capacity, and ESG performance, through a structured decision-making process. In the final stage, the predicted activity parameters and supplier information are integrated into a multi-objective optimization model to minimize total project cost and project duration while maximizing supplier ESG performance. The Augmented Epsilon Constraint method is employed to generate Pareto-optimal solutions. Results reveal clear trade-offs among objectives, demonstrating that ordering and supplier decisions vary significantly depending on managerial priorities. Overall, the proposed framework improves predictive accuracy and provides a practical decision-support tool for more integrated and sustainability-aware construction planning.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34733,"journal":{"name":"Results in Control and Optimization","volume":"24 ","pages":"Article 100803"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Results in Control and Optimization","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666720726001517","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Mathematics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Construction project performance is strongly influenced by the coordination of scheduling, material procurement, and supplier selection decisions. However, these decisions are often addressed separately, despite their significant interdependence and their joint impact on project cost, completion time, and supply chain sustainability. This study proposes an integrated framework that combines machine learning (ML), multi-criteria decision-making, and multi-objective optimization to support construction project scheduling and supplier selection under material ordering decisions. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to employ ML within integrated project scheduling and material ordering decisions for predicting both activity duration and activity execution cost. In the first stage, ML models are developed to predict activity duration and execution cost based on historical project data, and the results show that XGBoost outperforms Random Forest, achieving R2values of 0.901 and 0.923, respectively. In the second stage, supplier evaluation is conducted using multiple criteria, including price, lead time, reliability, quality, capacity, and ESG performance, through a structured decision-making process. In the final stage, the predicted activity parameters and supplier information are integrated into a multi-objective optimization model to minimize total project cost and project duration while maximizing supplier ESG performance. The Augmented Epsilon Constraint method is employed to generate Pareto-optimal solutions. Results reveal clear trade-offs among objectives, demonstrating that ordering and supplier decisions vary significantly depending on managerial priorities. Overall, the proposed framework improves predictive accuracy and provides a practical decision-support tool for more integrated and sustainability-aware construction planning.
基于数据的可持续项目调度和材料采购问题的机器学习和MCDM框架
施工项目绩效受到调度、材料采购和供应商选择决策的协调的强烈影响。然而,这些决策通常是单独处理的,尽管它们具有重要的相互依赖性,并且它们对项目成本、完成时间和供应链可持续性有共同的影响。本研究提出了一个结合机器学习、多标准决策和多目标优化的集成框架,以支持材料订购决策下的建筑项目调度和供应商选择。据我们所知,这是第一次在综合项目调度和材料订购决策中使用ML来预测活动持续时间和活动执行成本的研究。第一阶段,基于历史项目数据,开发ML模型预测活动持续时间和执行成本,结果表明,XGBoost优于Random Forest, r2值分别为0.901和0.923。在第二阶段,通过结构化的决策过程,使用多种标准对供应商进行评估,包括价格、交货时间、可靠性、质量、产能和ESG绩效。在最后阶段,将预测的活动参数和供应商信息集成到一个多目标优化模型中,以最小化项目总成本和项目持续时间,同时最大化供应商ESG绩效。采用增广Epsilon约束方法生成pareto最优解。结果揭示了目标之间的明确权衡,表明订购和供应商决策因管理优先级而有显着差异。总体而言,所提出的框架提高了预测的准确性,并为更具综合性和可持续性意识的建筑规划提供了实用的决策支持工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Results in Control and Optimization
Results in Control and Optimization Mathematics-Control and Optimization
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
51
审稿时长
91 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书