Python–Simulink simulation of DC-coupled PV–PEM electrolyzer systems under minute-level solar variability

Solar Energy Advances Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2026-09-09 DOI:10.1016/j.seja.2026.100149
Diamantis Almpantis, Hanna Wöhlert, Mohammad Hossein Fouladfar, Henrik Davidsson, Martin Andersson
{"title":"Python–Simulink simulation of DC-coupled PV–PEM electrolyzer systems under minute-level solar variability","authors":"Diamantis Almpantis,&nbsp;Hanna Wöhlert,&nbsp;Mohammad Hossein Fouladfar,&nbsp;Henrik Davidsson,&nbsp;Martin Andersson","doi":"10.1016/j.seja.2026.100149","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Directly coupling photovoltaic (PV) arrays to proton exchange membrane (PEM) electrolysers is among the cheapest routes to green hydrogen, but without a power converter the operating point is mismatched to the solar maximum-power point, and that mismatch shifts minute-to-minute with cloud cover. Which coupling strategy maximizes hydrogen yield under realistic solar variability, and whether the answer holds across climates, has remained unresolved, because dynamic PV-array reconfiguration and sub-second electrochemical transients have never been modelled together. This work addresses both within a single Python–Simulink co-simulation of seven DC-coupled PV–PEM architectures, spanning battery-less and battery-integrated designs, driven by minute-level irradiance from a hybrid K-nearest-neighbours downscaling algorithm and evaluated across four sites from polar Svalbard to the Namib Desert. The dominant lever on hydrogen output is found to be array reconfiguration rather than added power electronics: string switching alone raises solar-to-hydrogen efficiency to 14.9%, matching converter-based maximum-power-point tracking without a converter, and, combined with active battery management, gives the highest yield of all seven topologies. Temporal resolution proves decisive, as hourly-averaged data suppress almost 200 daily reconfiguration events and misrank the topologies. Crucially, the performance hierarchy is invariant from pole to desert, yet the benefit of reconfiguration is strongly climate-dependent, falling from +24% in the low, variable light of the polar site to +4% under the abundant, steady irradiance of the desert. The framework provides a validated, climate-aware benchmark for PV–PEM system design.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101174,"journal":{"name":"Solar Energy Advances","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100149"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Solar Energy Advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667113126000227","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Directly coupling photovoltaic (PV) arrays to proton exchange membrane (PEM) electrolysers is among the cheapest routes to green hydrogen, but without a power converter the operating point is mismatched to the solar maximum-power point, and that mismatch shifts minute-to-minute with cloud cover. Which coupling strategy maximizes hydrogen yield under realistic solar variability, and whether the answer holds across climates, has remained unresolved, because dynamic PV-array reconfiguration and sub-second electrochemical transients have never been modelled together. This work addresses both within a single Python–Simulink co-simulation of seven DC-coupled PV–PEM architectures, spanning battery-less and battery-integrated designs, driven by minute-level irradiance from a hybrid K-nearest-neighbours downscaling algorithm and evaluated across four sites from polar Svalbard to the Namib Desert. The dominant lever on hydrogen output is found to be array reconfiguration rather than added power electronics: string switching alone raises solar-to-hydrogen efficiency to 14.9%, matching converter-based maximum-power-point tracking without a converter, and, combined with active battery management, gives the highest yield of all seven topologies. Temporal resolution proves decisive, as hourly-averaged data suppress almost 200 daily reconfiguration events and misrank the topologies. Crucially, the performance hierarchy is invariant from pole to desert, yet the benefit of reconfiguration is strongly climate-dependent, falling from +24% in the low, variable light of the polar site to +4% under the abundant, steady irradiance of the desert. The framework provides a validated, climate-aware benchmark for PV–PEM system design.
Python-Simulink在分钟级太阳变率下的直流耦合PV-PEM电解系统仿真
将光伏(PV)阵列直接耦合到质子交换膜(PEM)电解槽是获得绿色氢的最便宜的途径之一,但如果没有电源转换器,工作点与太阳能最大功率点不匹配,而且这种不匹配随着云层的覆盖分分钟变化。在现实的太阳变异性下,哪种耦合策略能最大限度地提高氢产量,以及答案是否适用于各种气候,仍然没有解决,因为动态pv阵列重构和亚秒电化学瞬态从未一起建模。这项工作涉及七个直流耦合PV-PEM架构的单个Python-Simulink联合模拟,跨越无电池和电池集成设计,由混合k -近邻缩减算法的分钟级辐照度驱动,并在从极地斯瓦尔巴群岛到纳米布沙漠的四个地点进行评估。研究发现,影响氢气输出的主要杠杆是阵列重新配置,而不是增加电力电子设备:单是串开关就能将太阳能转化为氢气的效率提高到14.9%,匹配基于转换器的最大功率点跟踪,而无需转换器,并且与有源电池管理相结合,在所有七种拓扑结构中产量最高。时间分辨率被证明是决定性的,因为每小时平均的数据抑制了近200个每日重新配置事件和错误的拓扑排序。至关重要的是,从极点到沙漠,性能等级是不变的,但重新配置的好处是强烈依赖于气候的,从极地地区低、可变光的+24%下降到沙漠丰富、稳定光照下的+4%。该框架为PV-PEM系统设计提供了一个经过验证的气候感知基准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书