Not all farmers are the same – Analysing the agricultural policy landscape of India for climate change adaptation planning

IF 4.8 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Roopam Shukla, Niharika Tyagi, Lisa Murken, Christoph Gornott, Kamna Sachdeva, P.K. Joshi
{"title":"Not all farmers are the same – Analysing the agricultural policy landscape of India for climate change adaptation planning","authors":"Roopam Shukla,&nbsp;Niharika Tyagi,&nbsp;Lisa Murken,&nbsp;Christoph Gornott,&nbsp;Kamna Sachdeva,&nbsp;P.K. Joshi","doi":"10.1016/j.crsust.2026.100374","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Pervasive heterogeneity exists among farmers, shaped by geographical, biophysical, socio-economic, demographic, and cultural factors. This diversity is especially pronounced in India, where between 100 and 150 million farmers operate across diverse agro-ecological zones and socio-cultural contexts. As the impacts of climate-induced risks are socially and spatially differentiated, farmers' adaptation needs – the actions required and resources needed to respond effectively - are equally diverse. Planned adaptation must therefore be responsive to this diversity to be effective and inclusive. This paper aims to deconstruct farmers' definition and explores if and how farmer diversity is accounted for within 14 selected climate change, agriculture and farmer-centric policies for India. A farmer diversity framework was developed with 16 factors to access the selected policies' recognition of and engagement with farmer diversity. Quantitative textual analysis and qualitative thematic coding methods of content analysis are used to review and interpret the selected documents. The results reveal that policies commonly recognise farmer diversity through discrete, single-axis classifications based on landholding size, caste, and gender, while factors such as disability, migration status, and family size receive little to no policy attention. Existing adaptation provisions largely focus on increasing agricultural productivity and profitability, engaging primarily with farmers' economic needs and overlooking the diverse and intersecting social, cultural, and structural conditions that shape farmers' adaptive capacity. The paper argues that moving beyond single-axis farmer categories towards an intersectional engagement with farmers' identities is essential to plan and support meaningful, equitable adaptation outcomes for all farmers.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34472,"journal":{"name":"Current Research in Environmental Sustainability","volume":"12 ","pages":"Article 100374"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Research in Environmental Sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666049026000423","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pervasive heterogeneity exists among farmers, shaped by geographical, biophysical, socio-economic, demographic, and cultural factors. This diversity is especially pronounced in India, where between 100 and 150 million farmers operate across diverse agro-ecological zones and socio-cultural contexts. As the impacts of climate-induced risks are socially and spatially differentiated, farmers' adaptation needs – the actions required and resources needed to respond effectively - are equally diverse. Planned adaptation must therefore be responsive to this diversity to be effective and inclusive. This paper aims to deconstruct farmers' definition and explores if and how farmer diversity is accounted for within 14 selected climate change, agriculture and farmer-centric policies for India. A farmer diversity framework was developed with 16 factors to access the selected policies' recognition of and engagement with farmer diversity. Quantitative textual analysis and qualitative thematic coding methods of content analysis are used to review and interpret the selected documents. The results reveal that policies commonly recognise farmer diversity through discrete, single-axis classifications based on landholding size, caste, and gender, while factors such as disability, migration status, and family size receive little to no policy attention. Existing adaptation provisions largely focus on increasing agricultural productivity and profitability, engaging primarily with farmers' economic needs and overlooking the diverse and intersecting social, cultural, and structural conditions that shape farmers' adaptive capacity. The paper argues that moving beyond single-axis farmer categories towards an intersectional engagement with farmers' identities is essential to plan and support meaningful, equitable adaptation outcomes for all farmers.
并不是所有的农民都是一样的——分析印度的农业政策景观以适应气候变化的规划
农民之间普遍存在异质性,受地理、生物物理、社会经济、人口和文化因素的影响。这种多样性在印度尤为明显,印度有1亿至1.5亿农民在不同的农业生态区和社会文化背景下经营。由于气候风险的影响在社会和空间上存在差异,农民的适应需求——有效应对所需的行动和资源——也同样多样化。因此,有计划的适应必须对这种多样性作出反应,才能有效和具有包容性。本文旨在解构农民的定义,并探讨在14项选定的印度气候变化、农业和以农民为中心的政策中,农民多样性是否以及如何被考虑在内。制定了一个包含16个因素的农民多样性框架,以获得选定政策对农民多样性的承认和参与。采用内容分析的定量文本分析和定性主题编码方法对所选文献进行审查和解读。结果表明,政策通常通过基于土地持有规模、种姓和性别的离散单轴分类来承认农民多样性,而残疾、移民身份和家庭规模等因素几乎没有得到政策关注。现有的适应条款主要侧重于提高农业生产力和盈利能力,主要涉及农民的经济需求,而忽视了影响农民适应能力的各种交叉的社会、文化和结构条件。本文认为,超越单轴农民类别,转向与农民身份的交叉参与,对于为所有农民规划和支持有意义、公平的适应成果至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Research in Environmental Sustainability
Current Research in Environmental Sustainability Environmental Science-General Environmental Science
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
9.10%
发文量
76
审稿时长
95 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书