Stay In Your Own Lane: Navigating the Challenges of Upward Knowledge Sharing in Hierarchical Audit Teams

Tina D. Carpenter,Margaret H. Christ,Miranda T. Hugie
{"title":"Stay In Your Own Lane: Navigating the Challenges of Upward Knowledge Sharing in Hierarchical Audit Teams","authors":"Tina D. Carpenter,Margaret H. Christ,Miranda T. Hugie","doi":"10.2308/tar-2024-0518","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Digitalization is transforming the audit profession. Apprenticeship norms prescribe that knowledge flows down from supervisors to subordinates, but digitalization increasingly positions junior auditors as experts in emerging technology. Consequently, supervisors can learn from subordinates. This reversal challenges long-standing apprenticeship expectations, yet little is known about how it unfolds or the tensions it creates. Against this backdrop, we examine tensions that can arise when subordinate auditors share their knowledge with supervisors. Drawing on 51 semistructured interviews and guided by theory, we identify four recurring roadblocks to upward knowledge sharing: junior auditors' status motives, “same as last year” routines, status insecurity among immediate supervisors, and defensiveness when juniors cross perceived knowledge “lanes.” We also find a rare, countervailing pathway: the emergence of informal champions who legitimize junior auditors' contributions. Our study deepens understanding of how digitalization transforms team learning in audits and shows how historical structures and norms evolve under new conditions. Data Availability: Data were obtained from interviews. JEL Classifications: M41; M42; M51.","PeriodicalId":22240,"journal":{"name":"The Accounting Review","volume":"73 1","pages":"1-25"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Accounting Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2308/tar-2024-0518","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Digitalization is transforming the audit profession. Apprenticeship norms prescribe that knowledge flows down from supervisors to subordinates, but digitalization increasingly positions junior auditors as experts in emerging technology. Consequently, supervisors can learn from subordinates. This reversal challenges long-standing apprenticeship expectations, yet little is known about how it unfolds or the tensions it creates. Against this backdrop, we examine tensions that can arise when subordinate auditors share their knowledge with supervisors. Drawing on 51 semistructured interviews and guided by theory, we identify four recurring roadblocks to upward knowledge sharing: junior auditors' status motives, “same as last year” routines, status insecurity among immediate supervisors, and defensiveness when juniors cross perceived knowledge “lanes.” We also find a rare, countervailing pathway: the emergence of informal champions who legitimize junior auditors' contributions. Our study deepens understanding of how digitalization transforms team learning in audits and shows how historical structures and norms evolve under new conditions. Data Availability: Data were obtained from interviews. JEL Classifications: M41; M42; M51.
留在自己的道路上:在分层审计团队中引导向上知识共享的挑战
数字化正在改变审计行业。学徒制规范规定,知识从主管流向下属,但数字化日益使初级审计师成为新兴技术的专家。因此,主管可以向下属学习。这种逆转挑战了长期以来对学徒的期望,但人们对它是如何展开的,以及它造成的紧张局势知之甚少。在此背景下,我们研究了当下属审计师与主管分享他们的知识时可能出现的紧张关系。根据51个半结构化访谈,在理论指导下,我们确定了向上知识共享的四个反复出现的障碍:初级审计师的地位动机,“与去年相同”的惯例,直接主管的地位不安全感,以及当初级审计师跨越感知到的知识“通道”时的防御。我们还发现了一种罕见的、与之相反的途径:非正式拥护者的出现,他们使初级审计师的贡献合法化。我们的研究加深了对数字化如何改变审计团队学习的理解,并展示了历史结构和规范在新条件下的演变。数据可用性:数据来自访谈。JEL分类:M41;M42;M51。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书