Hugo de Lame, Thibauld Collet, Pauline Depoortere, Alexia Favaro, Philippe Lejeune, Adrien Michez, Antoine Plumacker, Jérôme Perin, Thomas Pollet, Quentin Ponette, Zoé Rousseau, Arthur Vander Linden, Marie-Pierre Tasseroul, Christian Messier, Jean-François Bastin
{"title":"Monitoring forest growth dynamics from harmonized multi-source time series of canopy height","authors":"Hugo de Lame, Thibauld Collet, Pauline Depoortere, Alexia Favaro, Philippe Lejeune, Adrien Michez, Antoine Plumacker, Jérôme Perin, Thomas Pollet, Quentin Ponette, Zoé Rousseau, Arthur Vander Linden, Marie-Pierre Tasseroul, Christian Messier, Jean-François Bastin","doi":"10.1016/j.jag.2026.105570","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Most remote sensing assessments of forest change focus on canopy cover, whereas the dynamics of vertical growth remain less investigated despite their sensitivity to external forcings. Yet, the increasing availability of canopy height products from multiple platforms facilitates spatially explicit characterization of vertical growth dynamics, provided that systematic measurement biases between sources are properly addressed. Here, we present a transferable workflow to map vertical growth dynamics from mixed-source canopy height model (CHM) time series, harmonized against forest inventory plots at ∼ 1000 m<sup>2</sup> resolution. We estimated vertical growth to model reference trajectories as a function of initial canopy height. Deviations from these trajectories were quantified, providing contextualized growth information. This approach was illustrated in the Belgian Ardenne using multi-source CHMs derived from recent aerial imagery and lidar data (2006–2021). Across all acquisitions, harmonization reduced systematic bias in dominant height estimates from 2.53 m to 0.01 m (RMSE = 1.79 m, R2 = 0.92), with canopy structure rather than acquisition parameters as the primary driver of bias. Subsequent growth decreased as initial heights increased, with earlier declines in broadleaf than coniferous stands. Spatially clustered growth deviations (Moran’s I = 0.31–0.46, p < 0.001) suggested systematic variation in performance among otherwise similar forests. By leveraging heterogeneous sources of canopy height, this workflow enables spatially exhaustive characterization of forest growth, adding structural understanding into multi-scale forest monitoring and resilience assessments.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73423,"journal":{"name":"International journal of applied earth observation and geoinformation : ITC journal","volume":"153 ","pages":"Article 105570"},"PeriodicalIF":8.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of applied earth observation and geoinformation : ITC journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1569843226004863","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REMOTE SENSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Most remote sensing assessments of forest change focus on canopy cover, whereas the dynamics of vertical growth remain less investigated despite their sensitivity to external forcings. Yet, the increasing availability of canopy height products from multiple platforms facilitates spatially explicit characterization of vertical growth dynamics, provided that systematic measurement biases between sources are properly addressed. Here, we present a transferable workflow to map vertical growth dynamics from mixed-source canopy height model (CHM) time series, harmonized against forest inventory plots at ∼ 1000 m2 resolution. We estimated vertical growth to model reference trajectories as a function of initial canopy height. Deviations from these trajectories were quantified, providing contextualized growth information. This approach was illustrated in the Belgian Ardenne using multi-source CHMs derived from recent aerial imagery and lidar data (2006–2021). Across all acquisitions, harmonization reduced systematic bias in dominant height estimates from 2.53 m to 0.01 m (RMSE = 1.79 m, R2 = 0.92), with canopy structure rather than acquisition parameters as the primary driver of bias. Subsequent growth decreased as initial heights increased, with earlier declines in broadleaf than coniferous stands. Spatially clustered growth deviations (Moran’s I = 0.31–0.46, p < 0.001) suggested systematic variation in performance among otherwise similar forests. By leveraging heterogeneous sources of canopy height, this workflow enables spatially exhaustive characterization of forest growth, adding structural understanding into multi-scale forest monitoring and resilience assessments.
大多数森林变化的遥感评估侧重于冠层覆盖,而垂直生长的动态尽管对外部强迫很敏感,但研究较少。然而,来自多个平台的冠层高度产品的日益增加的可用性有助于垂直生长动态的空间明确表征,前提是适当解决来源之间的系统测量偏差。在这里,我们提出了一个可转移的工作流程,从混合源冠层高度模型(CHM)时间序列中绘制垂直生长动态图,并在~ 1000 m2分辨率下与森林清查样地进行协调。我们估计垂直生长以模型参考轨迹作为初始冠层高度的函数。对这些轨迹的偏差进行了量化,提供了情境化的生长信息。该方法在比利时阿登地区进行了演示,使用了来自最近航空图像和激光雷达数据(2006-2021)的多源chm。在所有采集数据中,协调将优势高度估计的系统偏差从2.53 m减少到0.01 m (RMSE = 1.79 m, R2 = 0.92),而冠层结构而不是采集参数是偏差的主要驱动因素。随着初始高度的增加,随后的生长下降,阔叶林比针叶林下降得早。空间聚集性生长偏差(Moran’s I = 0.31-0.46, p < 0.001)表明,在其他方面相似的森林中,表现存在系统性差异。通过利用不同来源的冠层高度,该工作流程能够在空间上详尽地描述森林生长,为多尺度森林监测和恢复力评估增加结构理解。
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation publishes original papers that utilize earth observation data for natural resource and environmental inventory and management. These data primarily originate from remote sensing platforms, including satellites and aircraft, supplemented by surface and subsurface measurements. Addressing natural resources such as forests, agricultural land, soils, and water, as well as environmental concerns like biodiversity, land degradation, and hazards, the journal explores conceptual and data-driven approaches. It covers geoinformation themes like capturing, databasing, visualization, interpretation, data quality, and spatial uncertainty.