Variability in Procedural Tasks and Decisions Made During Ostomy Pouching System Changes Performed by Nurses With Different Nursing Credentials: A Clinical Simulation Study.

IF 1.8
Marketa Haughey, Melinda Harman, Casey S Hopkins, Hannah Gerlach, Leena Syed, William Bridges, Abigail Washburn, David M Neyens
{"title":"Variability in Procedural Tasks and Decisions Made During Ostomy Pouching System Changes Performed by Nurses With Different Nursing Credentials: A Clinical Simulation Study.","authors":"Marketa Haughey, Melinda Harman, Casey S Hopkins, Hannah Gerlach, Leena Syed, William Bridges, Abigail Washburn, David M Neyens","doi":"10.1097/WON.0000000000001315","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study was to explore clinical practice and decisions made during ostomy pouching system changes and procedures performed by nurses with different nursing credentials using a validated metric-based clinical simulation procedure.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Explanatory sequential mixed methods design.</p><p><strong>Subjects and setting: </strong>The study population comprised 24 participants with different nursing credentials: 6 were certified ostomy care nurse specialists, 8 were registered nurses working in acute care, and 10 were senior baccalaureate student nurses. Data were collected between September 2021 and February 2024 at the Clinical Learning and Research Center within the Clemson University School of Nursing (Clemson, SC, USA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study used a validated metric-based clinical simulation procedure to assess tasks performed during ostomy pouching system changes, task duration, and supplies used. The simulated experience was followed by administration of the System Usability Scale and a structured debriefing interview. Two-way repeated-measure ANOVA, mixed-effects logistic regressions, and single factor ANOVA were used to analyze quantitative variables according to variable type. Content analysis was used to analyze debriefing interviews and comments made by the participants during the simulated experience.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Certified nurses with expertise in ostomy management (CWOCN, CWON, COCN) spent significantly longer performing ostomy and peristomal skin care and pouching system changes tasks when compared with registered and student nurses. Differences between the nurse groups were observed for product selection, skin barrier sizing and adhesion, ostomy and peristomal skin care, along with infection control task categories. Scores on the perceived usability of ostomy pouching systems were above average for ostomy care specialists and registered nurses. Certified nurses with expertise in ostomy care had significantly higher perceived usability scores when compared with student nurses.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Variability in psychomotor and critical thinking tasks were observed among 3 groups nurses with different credentials. This knowledge provides targets for expanding training of nurses in ostomy care.</p>","PeriodicalId":520700,"journal":{"name":"Journal of wound, ostomy, and continence nursing : official publication of The Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nurses Society","volume":" ","pages":"402-415"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13573830/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of wound, ostomy, and continence nursing : official publication of The Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nurses Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/WON.0000000000001315","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to explore clinical practice and decisions made during ostomy pouching system changes and procedures performed by nurses with different nursing credentials using a validated metric-based clinical simulation procedure.

Design: Explanatory sequential mixed methods design.

Subjects and setting: The study population comprised 24 participants with different nursing credentials: 6 were certified ostomy care nurse specialists, 8 were registered nurses working in acute care, and 10 were senior baccalaureate student nurses. Data were collected between September 2021 and February 2024 at the Clinical Learning and Research Center within the Clemson University School of Nursing (Clemson, SC, USA).

Methods: This study used a validated metric-based clinical simulation procedure to assess tasks performed during ostomy pouching system changes, task duration, and supplies used. The simulated experience was followed by administration of the System Usability Scale and a structured debriefing interview. Two-way repeated-measure ANOVA, mixed-effects logistic regressions, and single factor ANOVA were used to analyze quantitative variables according to variable type. Content analysis was used to analyze debriefing interviews and comments made by the participants during the simulated experience.

Results: Certified nurses with expertise in ostomy management (CWOCN, CWON, COCN) spent significantly longer performing ostomy and peristomal skin care and pouching system changes tasks when compared with registered and student nurses. Differences between the nurse groups were observed for product selection, skin barrier sizing and adhesion, ostomy and peristomal skin care, along with infection control task categories. Scores on the perceived usability of ostomy pouching systems were above average for ostomy care specialists and registered nurses. Certified nurses with expertise in ostomy care had significantly higher perceived usability scores when compared with student nurses.

Conclusions: Variability in psychomotor and critical thinking tasks were observed among 3 groups nurses with different credentials. This knowledge provides targets for expanding training of nurses in ostomy care.

具有不同护理证书的护士在改变造口囊化系统过程中的程序任务和决策的可变性:一项临床模拟研究。
目的:本研究的目的是探讨临床实践和决定在造口袋系统的改变和程序中,由不同的护理证书的护士使用一个有效的基于度量的临床模拟程序。设计:解释性顺序混合方法设计。研究对象和环境:研究人群包括24名具有不同护理资格的参与者:6名是注册造口护理专科护士,8名是注册急症护理护士,10名是高级学士学位学生护士。数据于2021年9月至2024年2月在克莱姆森大学护理学院(Clemson, SC, USA)的临床学习和研究中心收集。方法:本研究采用一种经过验证的基于度量的临床模拟程序来评估造口袋装系统变化、任务持续时间和使用的耗材期间执行的任务。模拟的体验之后是系统可用性量表的管理和结构化的汇报访谈。定量变量按变量类型采用双向重复测量方差分析、混合效应logistic回归和单因素方差分析。内容分析用于分析参与者在模拟体验过程中的述职采访和评论。结果:具有造口管理专业知识的注册护士(CWON、CWON、COCN)执行造口、口周皮肤护理和囊袋系统更换任务的时间明显长于注册护士和实习护士。观察护理组在产品选择、皮肤屏障大小和粘连、造口和口周皮肤护理以及感染控制任务类别方面的差异。造口护理专家和注册护士对造口袋装系统可用性的感知得分高于平均水平。与学生护士相比,具有造口护理专业知识的认证护士具有显著更高的感知可用性得分。结论:三组不同学历的护士在精神运动和批判性思维任务上存在差异。这些知识为扩大护士在造口护理方面的培训提供了目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书