{"title":"Educational interventions in hand and upper extremity surgery: a scoping review.","authors":"Henry Wang, Koorosh Kashanian, Yibo Li","doi":"10.1016/j.hansur.2026.102776","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Hand and upper extremity surgery is increasingly performed in ambulatory settings, placing greater responsibility on patients to manage their postoperative recovery. While the readability of patient education materials has been studied, the formats used and their impact on postoperative outcomes have not been comprehensively synthesized.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A literature search of PubMed and Web of Science was conducted for eligible studies published between 2015 and 2025 that included patients undergoing or being considered for upper extremity surgery and who received an educational intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fourteen studies were included, comprising 1981 participants (52.9 ± 7.5 years old). Common procedures included carpal tunnel release, trigger finger release, and distal radius fracture fixation. Educational interventions varied in format (handouts, videos, digital tools, verbal instruction) and timing (preoperative, postoperative, or day of surgery), with several studies using multimodal approaches. Patient education had no consistent impacts on objective functional recovery metrics but instead was associated with improved patient satisfaction and comprehension, reduced opioid use, and fewer unplanned healthcare encounters. As a result, patient education may have its largest impacts on behavioral changes rather than biomechanical recovery, optimizing decision-making but not directly accelerating patient healing.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings support the integration of structured education into perioperative care and highlight the need for comparative studies evaluating optimal timing and delivery strategies.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>V.</p>","PeriodicalId":94023,"journal":{"name":"Hand surgery & rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"102776"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hand surgery & rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hansur.2026.102776","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Hand and upper extremity surgery is increasingly performed in ambulatory settings, placing greater responsibility on patients to manage their postoperative recovery. While the readability of patient education materials has been studied, the formats used and their impact on postoperative outcomes have not been comprehensively synthesized.
Methods: A literature search of PubMed and Web of Science was conducted for eligible studies published between 2015 and 2025 that included patients undergoing or being considered for upper extremity surgery and who received an educational intervention.
Results: Fourteen studies were included, comprising 1981 participants (52.9 ± 7.5 years old). Common procedures included carpal tunnel release, trigger finger release, and distal radius fracture fixation. Educational interventions varied in format (handouts, videos, digital tools, verbal instruction) and timing (preoperative, postoperative, or day of surgery), with several studies using multimodal approaches. Patient education had no consistent impacts on objective functional recovery metrics but instead was associated with improved patient satisfaction and comprehension, reduced opioid use, and fewer unplanned healthcare encounters. As a result, patient education may have its largest impacts on behavioral changes rather than biomechanical recovery, optimizing decision-making but not directly accelerating patient healing.
Conclusion: These findings support the integration of structured education into perioperative care and highlight the need for comparative studies evaluating optimal timing and delivery strategies.
手部和上肢手术越来越多地在门诊环境中进行,患者对术后恢复负有更大的责任。虽然研究了患者教育材料的可读性,但所使用的格式及其对术后结果的影响尚未全面综合。方法:通过PubMed和Web of Science检索2015年至2025年间发表的符合条件的研究,包括正在接受或考虑接受上肢手术并接受教育干预的患者。结果:纳入14项研究,包括1981名参与者(52.9±7.5岁)。常见的手术包括腕管松解、扳机指松解和桡骨远端骨折固定。教育干预在形式(讲义、视频、数字工具、口头指导)和时间(术前、术后或手术当天)上各不相同,有几项研究采用了多模式方法。患者教育对客观功能恢复指标没有一致的影响,但与患者满意度和理解力的提高、阿片类药物使用的减少以及计划外医疗保健遭遇的减少有关。因此,患者教育可能对行为改变产生最大的影响,而不是生物力学恢复,优化决策,但不能直接加速患者的愈合。结论:这些发现支持将结构化教育整合到围手术期护理中,并强调了评估最佳时机和分娩策略的比较研究的必要性。证据等级:V。