Damage control surgery and open abdomen in Hinchey III-IV acute diverticulitis: current practice from a nationwide Italian survey.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Alessio Giordano, Manuela Mastronardi, Andrea Mingoli, Hayato Kurihara, Eugenio Cucinotta, Mauro Zago, Massimo Chiarugi, Roberto Cirocchi, Paolo Prosperi, Alan Biloslavo, Gianluca Costa
{"title":"Damage control surgery and open abdomen in Hinchey III-IV acute diverticulitis: current practice from a nationwide Italian survey.","authors":"Alessio Giordano, Manuela Mastronardi, Andrea Mingoli, Hayato Kurihara, Eugenio Cucinotta, Mauro Zago, Massimo Chiarugi, Roberto Cirocchi, Paolo Prosperi, Alan Biloslavo, Gianluca Costa","doi":"10.1007/s13304-026-02834-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Damage control surgery (DCS) with staged reconstruction may offer an alternative to Hartmann's procedure in selected unstable patients with generalized peritonitis from acute diverticulitis, but its adoption in routine practice is uncertain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A nationwide web-based survey explored management of Hinchey III-IV acute diverticulitis, institutional use of open abdomen, and knowledge and application of DCS. Categorical data were summarized as n (%). The survey was endorsed by Italian Society of Emergency and Trauma Surgery (SICUT).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 175 respondents, 71.4% reported using Hartmann's procedure in at least half of severe cases, whereas 37.7% used primary anastomosis in at least one-quarter. Open abdomen was available in 82.3% of institutions. Awareness of DCS was reported by 148/174 (85.1%), and 116/168 (69.0%) had used it for severe diverticulitis; however, only 33/147 (22.4%) used a clinical score. Hemodynamic instability (83.1%), severe peritoneal contamination (73.2%), and the opportunity for delayed anastomosis (64.1%) were the main indications. Respondents with greater emergency surgery commitment more often reported primary anastomosis (48.1% vs. 20.9%; P < 0.001), open abdomen availability (93.5% vs. 64.2%; P < 0.001), and previous DCS use (75.5% vs. 58.1%; P = 0.024).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>DCS is familiar to and has been used by most respondents, but selection and implementation remain heterogeneous and rarely score-based. Standardized criteria, shared terminology, and prospective outcome evaluation are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":23391,"journal":{"name":"Updates in Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Updates in Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-026-02834-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Damage control surgery (DCS) with staged reconstruction may offer an alternative to Hartmann's procedure in selected unstable patients with generalized peritonitis from acute diverticulitis, but its adoption in routine practice is uncertain.

Methods: A nationwide web-based survey explored management of Hinchey III-IV acute diverticulitis, institutional use of open abdomen, and knowledge and application of DCS. Categorical data were summarized as n (%). The survey was endorsed by Italian Society of Emergency and Trauma Surgery (SICUT).

Results: Among 175 respondents, 71.4% reported using Hartmann's procedure in at least half of severe cases, whereas 37.7% used primary anastomosis in at least one-quarter. Open abdomen was available in 82.3% of institutions. Awareness of DCS was reported by 148/174 (85.1%), and 116/168 (69.0%) had used it for severe diverticulitis; however, only 33/147 (22.4%) used a clinical score. Hemodynamic instability (83.1%), severe peritoneal contamination (73.2%), and the opportunity for delayed anastomosis (64.1%) were the main indications. Respondents with greater emergency surgery commitment more often reported primary anastomosis (48.1% vs. 20.9%; P < 0.001), open abdomen availability (93.5% vs. 64.2%; P < 0.001), and previous DCS use (75.5% vs. 58.1%; P = 0.024).

Conclusion: DCS is familiar to and has been used by most respondents, but selection and implementation remain heterogeneous and rarely score-based. Standardized criteria, shared terminology, and prospective outcome evaluation are needed.

损伤控制手术和开腹治疗Hinchey III-IV型急性憩室炎:来自意大利全国调查的当前实践。
简介:损伤控制手术(DCS)分阶段重建可能为不稳定的急性憩室炎广泛性腹膜炎患者提供Hartmann手术的替代方案,但其在常规实践中的采用尚不确定。方法:通过一项全国性的网络调查,探讨Hinchey III-IV型急性憩室炎的管理、开腹的机构使用以及DCS的知识和应用。分类数据汇总为n(%)。这项调查得到了意大利急救和创伤外科学会(SICUT)的认可。结果:在175名受访者中,71.4%的人报告在至少一半的严重病例中使用哈特曼手术,而37.7%的人在至少四分之一的病例中使用初级吻合。82.3%的机构提供开腹手术。148/174人(85.1%)了解DCS, 116/168人(69.0%)在重度憩室炎中使用DCS;然而,只有33/147(22.4%)使用临床评分。血流动力学不稳定(83.1%)、严重腹膜污染(73.2%)和吻合术时机延迟(64.1%)是主要适应证。结论:大多数受访者熟悉并使用DCS,但选择和实施仍然存在异质性,很少基于评分。需要标准化标准、共享术语和前瞻性结果评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Updates in Surgery
Updates in Surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
208
期刊介绍: Updates in Surgery (UPIS) has been founded in 2010 as the official journal of the Italian Society of Surgery. It’s an international, English-language, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the surgical sciences. Its main goal is to offer a valuable update on the most recent developments of those surgical techniques that are rapidly evolving, forcing the community of surgeons to a rigorous debate and a continuous refinement of standards of care. In this respect position papers on the mostly debated surgical approaches and accreditation criteria have been published and are welcome for the future. Beside its focus on general surgery, the journal draws particular attention to cutting edge topics and emerging surgical fields that are publishing in monothematic issues guest edited by well-known experts. Updates in Surgery has been considering various types of papers: editorials, comprehensive reviews, original studies and technical notes related to specific surgical procedures and techniques on liver, colorectal, gastric, pancreatic, robotic and bariatric surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书