Alessio Giordano, Manuela Mastronardi, Andrea Mingoli, Hayato Kurihara, Eugenio Cucinotta, Mauro Zago, Massimo Chiarugi, Roberto Cirocchi, Paolo Prosperi, Alan Biloslavo, Gianluca Costa
{"title":"Damage control surgery and open abdomen in Hinchey III-IV acute diverticulitis: current practice from a nationwide Italian survey.","authors":"Alessio Giordano, Manuela Mastronardi, Andrea Mingoli, Hayato Kurihara, Eugenio Cucinotta, Mauro Zago, Massimo Chiarugi, Roberto Cirocchi, Paolo Prosperi, Alan Biloslavo, Gianluca Costa","doi":"10.1007/s13304-026-02834-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Damage control surgery (DCS) with staged reconstruction may offer an alternative to Hartmann's procedure in selected unstable patients with generalized peritonitis from acute diverticulitis, but its adoption in routine practice is uncertain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A nationwide web-based survey explored management of Hinchey III-IV acute diverticulitis, institutional use of open abdomen, and knowledge and application of DCS. Categorical data were summarized as n (%). The survey was endorsed by Italian Society of Emergency and Trauma Surgery (SICUT).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 175 respondents, 71.4% reported using Hartmann's procedure in at least half of severe cases, whereas 37.7% used primary anastomosis in at least one-quarter. Open abdomen was available in 82.3% of institutions. Awareness of DCS was reported by 148/174 (85.1%), and 116/168 (69.0%) had used it for severe diverticulitis; however, only 33/147 (22.4%) used a clinical score. Hemodynamic instability (83.1%), severe peritoneal contamination (73.2%), and the opportunity for delayed anastomosis (64.1%) were the main indications. Respondents with greater emergency surgery commitment more often reported primary anastomosis (48.1% vs. 20.9%; P < 0.001), open abdomen availability (93.5% vs. 64.2%; P < 0.001), and previous DCS use (75.5% vs. 58.1%; P = 0.024).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>DCS is familiar to and has been used by most respondents, but selection and implementation remain heterogeneous and rarely score-based. Standardized criteria, shared terminology, and prospective outcome evaluation are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":23391,"journal":{"name":"Updates in Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Updates in Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-026-02834-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Damage control surgery (DCS) with staged reconstruction may offer an alternative to Hartmann's procedure in selected unstable patients with generalized peritonitis from acute diverticulitis, but its adoption in routine practice is uncertain.
Methods: A nationwide web-based survey explored management of Hinchey III-IV acute diverticulitis, institutional use of open abdomen, and knowledge and application of DCS. Categorical data were summarized as n (%). The survey was endorsed by Italian Society of Emergency and Trauma Surgery (SICUT).
Results: Among 175 respondents, 71.4% reported using Hartmann's procedure in at least half of severe cases, whereas 37.7% used primary anastomosis in at least one-quarter. Open abdomen was available in 82.3% of institutions. Awareness of DCS was reported by 148/174 (85.1%), and 116/168 (69.0%) had used it for severe diverticulitis; however, only 33/147 (22.4%) used a clinical score. Hemodynamic instability (83.1%), severe peritoneal contamination (73.2%), and the opportunity for delayed anastomosis (64.1%) were the main indications. Respondents with greater emergency surgery commitment more often reported primary anastomosis (48.1% vs. 20.9%; P < 0.001), open abdomen availability (93.5% vs. 64.2%; P < 0.001), and previous DCS use (75.5% vs. 58.1%; P = 0.024).
Conclusion: DCS is familiar to and has been used by most respondents, but selection and implementation remain heterogeneous and rarely score-based. Standardized criteria, shared terminology, and prospective outcome evaluation are needed.
期刊介绍:
Updates in Surgery (UPIS) has been founded in 2010 as the official journal of the Italian Society of Surgery. It’s an international, English-language, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the surgical sciences. Its main goal is to offer a valuable update on the most recent developments of those surgical techniques that are rapidly evolving, forcing the community of surgeons to a rigorous debate and a continuous refinement of standards of care. In this respect position papers on the mostly debated surgical approaches and accreditation criteria have been published and are welcome for the future.
Beside its focus on general surgery, the journal draws particular attention to cutting edge topics and emerging surgical fields that are publishing in monothematic issues guest edited by well-known experts.
Updates in Surgery has been considering various types of papers: editorials, comprehensive reviews, original studies and technical notes related to specific surgical procedures and techniques on liver, colorectal, gastric, pancreatic, robotic and bariatric surgery.