Are Comparable Short-term Outcomes Between Hamstring and Quadriceps Tendon Autografts for ACL Reconstruction Statistically Robust? A Reverse Continuous Fragility Index Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine Pub Date : 2026-09-09 eCollection Date: 2026-09-01 DOI:10.1177/23259671261479032
Tzu-Hao Tseng, Shau-Huai Fu, Yao-Chang Lo, Chien-Lin Chen, Hongsen Chiang
{"title":"Are Comparable Short-term Outcomes Between Hamstring and Quadriceps Tendon Autografts for ACL Reconstruction Statistically Robust? A Reverse Continuous Fragility Index Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.","authors":"Tzu-Hao Tseng, Shau-Huai Fu, Yao-Chang Lo, Chien-Lin Chen, Hongsen Chiang","doi":"10.1177/23259671261479032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and meta-analyses have generally reported comparable short-term outcomes between hamstring tendon (HT) and quadriceps tendon (QT) autografts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). However, the statistical robustness of these nonsignificant continuous outcomes remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Purpose/hypothesis: </strong>To evaluate the robustness of nonsignificant continuous outcomes in RCTs comparing HT and QT autografts for ACLR using the reverse continuous fragility index (rCFI). It was hypothesized that these outcomes would demonstrate statistical robustness.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Systematic review; Level of evidence, 1.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library was performed according to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines from database inception to April 2026. Level 1 RCTs comparing HT and QT autografts for primary adult ACLR were included if they reported ≥1 nonsignificant continuous outcome with sufficient summary statistics for rCFI calculation. The primary analysis evaluated nonsignificant primary continuous outcomes at the longest available follow-up. rCFI values were calculated using pseudoindividual data sets generated from published summary statistics and were compared with loss to follow-up. Reverse continuous fragility quotients were also calculated. Sensitivity analysis using 20 simulation seeds assessed estimate stability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight RCTs including 562 allocated patients were included. At the follow-up time point used for primary analysis, 482 patients were available, with an overall loss to follow-up of 80 patients. Six studies reported nonsignificant primary continuous outcomes eligible for rCFI analysis. The mean rCFI was 17.4 ± 7.3, and the mean reverse continuous fragility quotient was 0.296 ± 0.069. All eligible primary outcomes had rCFI values greater than the corresponding loss to follow-up, and sensitivity analysis showed stable findings. Among 21 eligible secondary outcomes, 19 had rCFI values greater than loss to follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Nonsignificant primary continuous outcomes in RCTs comparing HT and QT autografts for ACLR demonstrated statistical robustness. These findings support the stability of randomized evidence showing comparable short-term continuous outcomes between HT and QT autografts.</p>","PeriodicalId":19646,"journal":{"name":"Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":"14 9","pages":"23259671261479032"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13558947/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23259671261479032","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and meta-analyses have generally reported comparable short-term outcomes between hamstring tendon (HT) and quadriceps tendon (QT) autografts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). However, the statistical robustness of these nonsignificant continuous outcomes remains unclear.

Purpose/hypothesis: To evaluate the robustness of nonsignificant continuous outcomes in RCTs comparing HT and QT autografts for ACLR using the reverse continuous fragility index (rCFI). It was hypothesized that these outcomes would demonstrate statistical robustness.

Study design: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 1.

Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library was performed according to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines from database inception to April 2026. Level 1 RCTs comparing HT and QT autografts for primary adult ACLR were included if they reported ≥1 nonsignificant continuous outcome with sufficient summary statistics for rCFI calculation. The primary analysis evaluated nonsignificant primary continuous outcomes at the longest available follow-up. rCFI values were calculated using pseudoindividual data sets generated from published summary statistics and were compared with loss to follow-up. Reverse continuous fragility quotients were also calculated. Sensitivity analysis using 20 simulation seeds assessed estimate stability.

Results: Eight RCTs including 562 allocated patients were included. At the follow-up time point used for primary analysis, 482 patients were available, with an overall loss to follow-up of 80 patients. Six studies reported nonsignificant primary continuous outcomes eligible for rCFI analysis. The mean rCFI was 17.4 ± 7.3, and the mean reverse continuous fragility quotient was 0.296 ± 0.069. All eligible primary outcomes had rCFI values greater than the corresponding loss to follow-up, and sensitivity analysis showed stable findings. Among 21 eligible secondary outcomes, 19 had rCFI values greater than loss to follow-up.

Conclusion: Nonsignificant primary continuous outcomes in RCTs comparing HT and QT autografts for ACLR demonstrated statistical robustness. These findings support the stability of randomized evidence showing comparable short-term continuous outcomes between HT and QT autografts.

腿筋和股四头肌腱自体移植重建ACL的短期疗效是否具有统计学上的可靠性?随机对照试验的逆向连续脆弱性指数分析。
背景:随机对照试验(rct)和荟萃分析普遍报道了腘绳肌腱(HT)和股四头肌腱(QT)自体移植用于前交叉韧带重建(ACLR)的短期结果相当。然而,这些不显著的连续结果的统计稳健性仍不清楚。目的/假设:使用反向连续脆弱性指数(rCFI)评估比较HT和QT自体移植治疗ACLR的随机对照试验中非显著连续结果的稳健性。假设这些结果将显示统计稳健性。研究设计:系统评价;证据等级:1。方法:根据PRISMA(系统评价和荟萃分析首选报告项目)指南,从数据库建立到2026年4月,对PubMed、Embase和Cochrane图书馆进行系统检索。比较HT和QT自体移植治疗原发性成人ACLR的1级rct,如果报告了≥1个无显著性连续结局,且有足够的rCFI计算汇总统计,则纳入。初步分析评估了最长随访期间无显著性的主要连续结局。rCFI值使用从已发表的汇总统计数据中生成的伪个体数据集计算,并与随访损失进行比较。并计算了反向连续脆弱性商。利用20个模拟种子进行敏感性分析,评价了估计的稳定性。结果:纳入8项随机对照试验,共纳入562例分配患者。在用于初步分析的随访时间点,有482例患者,总体随访损失80例患者。6项研究报告了符合rCFI分析的无显著主要连续结局。平均rCFI为17.4±7.3,平均反向连续脆性商为0.296±0.069。所有符合条件的主要结局rCFI值均大于相应的随访损失,敏感性分析显示结果稳定。在21个符合条件的次要结局中,19个rCFI值大于随访损失。结论:在比较HT和QT自体移植治疗ACLR的随机对照试验中,无显著的主要连续结果显示了统计学上的稳健性。这些发现支持随机证据的稳定性,表明HT和QT自体移植的短期连续结果具有可比性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
876
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine (OJSM), developed by the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine (AOSSM), is a global, peer-reviewed, open access journal that combines the interests of researchers and clinical practitioners across orthopaedic sports medicine, arthroscopy, and knee arthroplasty. Topics include original research in the areas of: -Orthopaedic Sports Medicine, including surgical and nonsurgical treatment of orthopaedic sports injuries -Arthroscopic Surgery (Shoulder/Elbow/Wrist/Hip/Knee/Ankle/Foot) -Relevant translational research -Sports traumatology/epidemiology -Knee and shoulder arthroplasty The OJSM also publishes relevant systematic reviews and meta-analyses. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书