Risks of Appropriate Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Therapy and Hospitalization Are Increased Around Device-Detected Atrial High-Rate Episodes Longer Than 6 min

IF 1.9 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Nanna Nørgaard, Christoffer Tobias Witt, Mads Brix Kronborg, Jens Cosedis Nielsen
{"title":"Risks of Appropriate Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Therapy and Hospitalization Are Increased Around Device-Detected Atrial High-Rate Episodes Longer Than 6 min","authors":"Nanna Nørgaard,&nbsp;Christoffer Tobias Witt,&nbsp;Mads Brix Kronborg,&nbsp;Jens Cosedis Nielsen","doi":"10.1002/joa3.70448","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>The prognostic significance of device-detected atrial high-rate episodes (AHRE) in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) remains poorly understood. We aimed to evaluate whether device-detected AHRE ≥ 6 min is temporally associated with appropriate ICD therapy and cardiac hospitalization.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We studied consecutive patients with dual chamber or cardiac resynchronization therapy ICD with predominantly sinus rhythm and followed with remote monitoring (RM). Risk of ICD therapy and hospitalization was compared inside a 60-day peri-AHRE period (from 30 days before to 30 days after AHRE detection) with risk outside the peri-AHRE period. We included appropriate ICD therapies only. Adjusted extended Cox model with time-varying exposure analysis was used to assess potential associations between AHRE and ICD therapies and hospitalization.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>We included 882 patients. Median age 67 years [interquartile range; 59–73], 81% male, 76% had coronary artery disease, and 61% CRT-D. The 30-day risk of appropriate ICD shock was 0.8% inside the peri-AHRE period compared with 0.2% outside the peri-AHRE period (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 3.04; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.67–5.52; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). The 30-day risk of any appropriate ICD therapy was increased inside compared with outside the peri-AHRE period (1.2% vs. 0.4%, aHR 1.71 [95% CI: 1.14–2.57], <i>p</i> = 0.01). Cardiac hospitalization was higher inside the peri-AHRE period (3.1% vs. 1.0%, aHR 1.42 [95% CI: 1.05–1.92], <i>p</i> = 0.02).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The risk of appropriate ICD shock is three-fold elevated during a 60-day period surrounding AHRE detection. A comparable temporal pattern was noted for cardiac hospitalizations, supporting that AHREs may indicate clinical worsening of heart disease.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15174,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Arrhythmia","volume":"42 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13558661/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Arrhythmia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/joa3.70448","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The prognostic significance of device-detected atrial high-rate episodes (AHRE) in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) remains poorly understood. We aimed to evaluate whether device-detected AHRE ≥ 6 min is temporally associated with appropriate ICD therapy and cardiac hospitalization.

Methods

We studied consecutive patients with dual chamber or cardiac resynchronization therapy ICD with predominantly sinus rhythm and followed with remote monitoring (RM). Risk of ICD therapy and hospitalization was compared inside a 60-day peri-AHRE period (from 30 days before to 30 days after AHRE detection) with risk outside the peri-AHRE period. We included appropriate ICD therapies only. Adjusted extended Cox model with time-varying exposure analysis was used to assess potential associations between AHRE and ICD therapies and hospitalization.

Results

We included 882 patients. Median age 67 years [interquartile range; 59–73], 81% male, 76% had coronary artery disease, and 61% CRT-D. The 30-day risk of appropriate ICD shock was 0.8% inside the peri-AHRE period compared with 0.2% outside the peri-AHRE period (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 3.04; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.67–5.52; p < 0.001). The 30-day risk of any appropriate ICD therapy was increased inside compared with outside the peri-AHRE period (1.2% vs. 0.4%, aHR 1.71 [95% CI: 1.14–2.57], p = 0.01). Cardiac hospitalization was higher inside the peri-AHRE period (3.1% vs. 1.0%, aHR 1.42 [95% CI: 1.05–1.92], p = 0.02).

Conclusion

The risk of appropriate ICD shock is three-fold elevated during a 60-day period surrounding AHRE detection. A comparable temporal pattern was noted for cardiac hospitalizations, supporting that AHREs may indicate clinical worsening of heart disease.

适当的植入式心律转复除颤器治疗和住院治疗的风险在器械检测到的心房高频率发作超过6分钟时增加。
背景:植入式心律转复除颤器(ICD)患者的设备检测心房高率发作(AHRE)的预后意义尚不清楚。我们的目的是评估设备检测到的AHRE≥6分钟是否与适当的ICD治疗和心脏住院有关。方法:我们研究了以窦性心律为主的双室或心脏再同步治疗的ICD患者,并进行了远程监测(RM)。比较60天围AHRE期(AHRE检测前30天至检测后30天)内ICD治疗和住院的风险与围AHRE期外的风险。我们只纳入了适当的ICD治疗。采用时变暴露分析的调整扩展Cox模型来评估AHRE与ICD治疗和住院之间的潜在关联。结果:纳入882例患者。中位年龄67岁[四分位数范围;[59-73], 81%男性,76%有冠状动脉疾病,61%有ct - d。围ahre期发生适当ICD休克的30天风险为0.8%,围ahre期外为0.2%(校正风险比[aHR] 3.04; 95%可信区间[CI]: 1.67-5.52; pp = 0.01)。心脏住院率在围ahre期间较高(3.1%比1.0%,aHR 1.42 [95% CI: 1.05-1.92], p = 0.02)。结论:在AHRE检测前后的60天内,适当的ICD休克的风险增加了3倍。心脏住院患者也有类似的时间模式,支持AHREs可能表明心脏病的临床恶化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Arrhythmia
Journal of Arrhythmia CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
10.00%
发文量
127
审稿时长
45 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书