Raising the bar: translating global guidelines to achieve local policy on cholera elimination in Zambia-a qualitative case study.

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Chanda Mwamba, Tikulirekuti Banda, Mazyanga Mazaba, Victor Mukonka, Kennedy Malama, Esther Hamweemba, Mainza Syulikwa, Roma Chilengi, Anjali Sharma, Christine Fahim, Robert Marten, Sonam Yangchen, Sharon Straus
{"title":"Raising the bar: translating global guidelines to achieve local policy on cholera elimination in Zambia-a qualitative case study.","authors":"Chanda Mwamba, Tikulirekuti Banda, Mazyanga Mazaba, Victor Mukonka, Kennedy Malama, Esther Hamweemba, Mainza Syulikwa, Roma Chilengi, Anjali Sharma, Christine Fahim, Robert Marten, Sonam Yangchen, Sharon Straus","doi":"10.1186/s12961-026-01464-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The global roadmap to eliminating cholera by 2030 relies on early detection and response, vaccination in hotspots and effective partnerships. In sub-Saharan Africa, where 60% of the 2.8 million annual cases occur, cholera elimination requires a multisectoral response. To accelerate progress, improved understanding of how to translate a multisectoral approach to eliminate cholera is needed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We evaluated implementation of Zambia's Multisectoral Cholera Elimination Plan (MCEP) using six phases of Graham's Knowledge-to-Action (KTA) framework (adaption, assessing barriers, implementation, monitoring, evaluation and sustaining knowledge use). We reviewed the MCEP to assess the policy environment for supporting implementation and triangulated information from 24 key informant interviews with policy-makers and implementers, 12 in-depth interviews with cholera survivors and focus group discussions with 28 community-based neighbourhood health committee members. Thematic analysis was used to analyse the data. We present our findings under each KTA phase.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The MCEP prioritizes actions in hotspots, and vaccinations through a multisectoral governance and coordination structure. The appointment of a coordinator and formation of multisectoral technical working groups (TWGs) have improved dissemination, coordination and the case for additional investments in laboratory capacity, cholera vaccines and infrastructure for water, sanitation, hygiene and decentralized solid waste management. However, slow institutionalization of plans, weak coordination, inadequate funding, poor infrastructure and the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has led to fragmented implementation. The sustainability of the MCEP is not assured without: (1) comprehensive advocacy; (2) resource mobilization (international and national budget commitment); (3) monitoring and evaluation (M&E) of progress; and (4) information synthesis and dissemination for end users.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A multisectoral approach can help gain adequate momentum and efficiencies to eliminate cholera in Zambia, provided stakeholders are fully committed and funding is allocated to support plans. An adaptive collaborative strategy within national guidelines and policies that includes target communities is needed to support local translation, adaptation and concerted efforts to eliminate cholera.</p>","PeriodicalId":12870,"journal":{"name":"Health Research Policy and Systems","volume":"24 Suppl 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13560184/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Research Policy and Systems","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-026-01464-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The global roadmap to eliminating cholera by 2030 relies on early detection and response, vaccination in hotspots and effective partnerships. In sub-Saharan Africa, where 60% of the 2.8 million annual cases occur, cholera elimination requires a multisectoral response. To accelerate progress, improved understanding of how to translate a multisectoral approach to eliminate cholera is needed.

Methods: We evaluated implementation of Zambia's Multisectoral Cholera Elimination Plan (MCEP) using six phases of Graham's Knowledge-to-Action (KTA) framework (adaption, assessing barriers, implementation, monitoring, evaluation and sustaining knowledge use). We reviewed the MCEP to assess the policy environment for supporting implementation and triangulated information from 24 key informant interviews with policy-makers and implementers, 12 in-depth interviews with cholera survivors and focus group discussions with 28 community-based neighbourhood health committee members. Thematic analysis was used to analyse the data. We present our findings under each KTA phase.

Results: The MCEP prioritizes actions in hotspots, and vaccinations through a multisectoral governance and coordination structure. The appointment of a coordinator and formation of multisectoral technical working groups (TWGs) have improved dissemination, coordination and the case for additional investments in laboratory capacity, cholera vaccines and infrastructure for water, sanitation, hygiene and decentralized solid waste management. However, slow institutionalization of plans, weak coordination, inadequate funding, poor infrastructure and the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has led to fragmented implementation. The sustainability of the MCEP is not assured without: (1) comprehensive advocacy; (2) resource mobilization (international and national budget commitment); (3) monitoring and evaluation (M&E) of progress; and (4) information synthesis and dissemination for end users.

Conclusions: A multisectoral approach can help gain adequate momentum and efficiencies to eliminate cholera in Zambia, provided stakeholders are fully committed and funding is allocated to support plans. An adaptive collaborative strategy within national guidelines and policies that includes target communities is needed to support local translation, adaptation and concerted efforts to eliminate cholera.

提高标准:翻译全球指导方针以实现赞比亚消除霍乱的地方政策——定性案例研究。
背景:到2030年消除霍乱的全球路线图依赖于早期发现和应对、在热点地区接种疫苗以及有效的伙伴关系。在撒哈拉以南非洲,每年280万病例中有60%发生在那里,消除霍乱需要采取多部门应对措施。为了加快进展,需要更好地了解如何将多部门方法转化为消除霍乱的方法。方法:我们使用Graham的知识到行动(KTA)框架的六个阶段(适应、评估障碍、实施、监测、评估和维持知识使用)评估赞比亚多部门消除霍乱计划(MCEP)的实施情况。我们审查了MCEP,以评估支持实施的政策环境,并从24次对决策者和实施者的关键举报人访谈、12次对霍乱幸存者的深度访谈以及与28名社区社区社区卫生委员会成员的焦点小组讨论中获得三角化信息。采用主题分析法对数据进行分析。我们在每个KTA阶段都展示了我们的发现。结果:MCEP通过多部门治理和协调结构,优先考虑热点地区的行动和疫苗接种。任命一名协调员和成立多部门技术工作组改善了传播和协调,并加强了对实验室能力、霍乱疫苗以及水、环境卫生、个人卫生和分散固体废物管理基础设施的额外投资。然而,由于计划制度化缓慢、协调不力、资金不足、基础设施差以及2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行,导致实施工作支离破碎。如果没有:(1)全面的倡导,MCEP的可持续性就无法保证;(2)资源调动(国际和国家预算承诺);(3)进度监测与评价;(4)面向终端用户的信息综合与传播。结论:只要利益攸关方充分承诺,并拨出资金支持各项计划,多部门方法可帮助获得在赞比亚消除霍乱的充分动力和效率。需要在包括目标社区在内的国家指导方针和政策范围内制定适应性协作战略,以支持当地翻译、调整和协调努力,以消除霍乱。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Research Policy and Systems
Health Research Policy and Systems HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
7.50%
发文量
124
审稿时长
27 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Research Policy and Systems is an Open Access, peer-reviewed, online journal that aims to provide a platform for the global research community to share their views, findings, insights and successes. Health Research Policy and Systems considers manuscripts that investigate the role of evidence-based health policy and health research systems in ensuring the efficient utilization and application of knowledge to improve health and health equity, especially in developing countries. Research is the foundation for improvements in public health. The problem is that people involved in different areas of research, together with managers and administrators in charge of research entities, do not communicate sufficiently with each other.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书