Machine learning-based prediction of cross-immunity.

IF 7.3 2区 生物学 Q1 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Vivien Erzsébet Resch, László Tóth, Anita Rácz, Dezső Virok, Gábor Paragi
{"title":"Machine learning-based prediction of cross-immunity.","authors":"Vivien Erzsébet Resch, László Tóth, Anita Rácz, Dezső Virok, Gábor Paragi","doi":"10.1093/bib/bbag484","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cross-immunity, defined as the ability of T-cells to recognize multiple antigen peptide-major histocompatibility complexes, is a fundamental feature of adaptive immunity. However, the prediction of different peptide epitopes that can be recognized by the same T-cell receptor remains challenging. Currently, artificial intelligent (AI)-based machine learning (ML) methods can be successfully used for pattern recognition in epitope molecular space by detecting the functional similarity between peptide sequences. In this study, using literature-based experimental data, we examined ML-based binary classification models trained on small datasets to predict the activity of nine-amino-acid-long peptides. Our results suggest that the consensus function of well-established similarity matrix-based representations and structural-based descriptors of epitopes yields better performance because representation-specific noises are reduced and individual model weaknesses are partially compensated. We also sought to determine the extent to which the predictive power of the applied AIs procedure depended on the physicochemical content of the descriptor set during the training process. In addition, challenging the models, we applied them to an independent experimental dataset to examine the effects of diverse laboratory conditions on a regulated biological measurement. In summary, applying a consensus function can capture the biological complexity of cross-reactivity at the binary classification level, even when applied to relatively small datasets.</p>","PeriodicalId":9209,"journal":{"name":"Briefings in bioinformatics","volume":"27 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13561412/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Briefings in bioinformatics","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bib/bbag484","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cross-immunity, defined as the ability of T-cells to recognize multiple antigen peptide-major histocompatibility complexes, is a fundamental feature of adaptive immunity. However, the prediction of different peptide epitopes that can be recognized by the same T-cell receptor remains challenging. Currently, artificial intelligent (AI)-based machine learning (ML) methods can be successfully used for pattern recognition in epitope molecular space by detecting the functional similarity between peptide sequences. In this study, using literature-based experimental data, we examined ML-based binary classification models trained on small datasets to predict the activity of nine-amino-acid-long peptides. Our results suggest that the consensus function of well-established similarity matrix-based representations and structural-based descriptors of epitopes yields better performance because representation-specific noises are reduced and individual model weaknesses are partially compensated. We also sought to determine the extent to which the predictive power of the applied AIs procedure depended on the physicochemical content of the descriptor set during the training process. In addition, challenging the models, we applied them to an independent experimental dataset to examine the effects of diverse laboratory conditions on a regulated biological measurement. In summary, applying a consensus function can capture the biological complexity of cross-reactivity at the binary classification level, even when applied to relatively small datasets.

基于机器学习的交叉免疫预测。
交叉免疫被定义为t细胞识别多种抗原肽-主要组织相容性复合物的能力,是适应性免疫的基本特征。然而,预测可以被相同的t细胞受体识别的不同肽表位仍然具有挑战性。目前,基于人工智能(AI)的机器学习(ML)方法可以通过检测肽序列之间的功能相似性,成功地用于表位分子空间的模式识别。在这项研究中,我们使用基于文献的实验数据,研究了在小数据集上训练的基于ml的二元分类模型,以预测9个氨基酸长肽的活性。我们的研究结果表明,基于相似性矩阵的表征和基于结构的表位描述符的共识函数产生了更好的性能,因为表征特定的噪声被减少了,个体模型的弱点得到了部分补偿。我们还试图确定应用人工智能程序的预测能力在多大程度上取决于训练过程中描述符集的物理化学内容。此外,我们对这些模型提出了挑战,将它们应用于一个独立的实验数据集,以检验不同实验室条件对受控生物测量的影响。总之,即使应用于相对较小的数据集,应用共识函数也可以在二元分类水平上捕获交叉反应性的生物复杂性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Briefings in bioinformatics
Briefings in bioinformatics 生物-生化研究方法
CiteScore
13.20
自引率
13.70%
发文量
549
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Briefings in Bioinformatics is an international journal serving as a platform for researchers and educators in the life sciences. It also appeals to mathematicians, statisticians, and computer scientists applying their expertise to biological challenges. The journal focuses on reviews tailored for users of databases and analytical tools in contemporary genetics, molecular and systems biology. It stands out by offering practical assistance and guidance to non-specialists in computerized methodologies. Covering a wide range from introductory concepts to specific protocols and analyses, the papers address bacterial, plant, fungal, animal, and human data. The journal's detailed subject areas include genetic studies of phenotypes and genotypes, mapping, DNA sequencing, expression profiling, gene expression studies, microarrays, alignment methods, protein profiles and HMMs, lipids, metabolic and signaling pathways, structure determination and function prediction, phylogenetic studies, and education and training.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书