Monitoring of breathing effort through pressure time product measurement using airway occlusion pressure (PTPPOCC study).

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Emiliano Gogniat, Emilio Steinberg, Gustavo A Plotnikow, Sebastián Fredes, Roque S Moracci, Norberto Tiribelli, Javier H Dorado, Sergio Giannasi, Mariano Setten, José Dianti, Matías Madorno, Pablo O Rodriguez
{"title":"Monitoring of breathing effort through pressure time product measurement using airway occlusion pressure (PTP<sub>POCC</sub> study).","authors":"Emiliano Gogniat, Emilio Steinberg, Gustavo A Plotnikow, Sebastián Fredes, Roque S Moracci, Norberto Tiribelli, Javier H Dorado, Sergio Giannasi, Mariano Setten, José Dianti, Matías Madorno, Pablo O Rodriguez","doi":"10.1186/s12871-026-04113-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Monitoring respiratory effort is crucial to prevent ventilator-induced lung injury and diaphragmatic dysfunction, but esophageal manometry (the gold standard) is invasive an can be cumbersome. The airway occlusion pressure (ΔP<sub>OCC</sub>) correlates with inspiratory effort but does not account for inspiratory time (Ti) or respiratory rate (RR). We aimed to validate a novel non-invasive index (PTP<sub>POCC</sub>) that combines ΔP<sub>OCC</sub>, Ti, and RR to estimate the esophageal pressure-time product (PTP<sub>ESO</sub>).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a prospective, multicenter, physiological, crossover study. Three levels of inspiratory pressure (5, 10, and 15 cm H₂O) were randomly applied in patients with invasive mechanical ventilation in pressure support mode. We simultaneously measured PTP<sub>ESO</sub> and calculated the non-invasive PTP<sub>POCC</sub> (PTP<sub>POCC-min</sub> = (0.75 × ΔP<sub>OCC</sub> × Ti / 2) × RR). Association was assessed using linear mixed-effects models. Diagnostic accuracy for detecting high (PTP<sub>ESO</sub> >150 cmH₂O·s·min⁻¹) and low (PTP<sub>ESO</sub> <50 cmH₂O·s·min⁻¹) inspiratory effort was evaluated using ROC curves.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 49 patients were analyzed. A significant positive association was found between PTP<sub>ESO-min</sub> and PTP<sub>POCC-min</sub> (regression coefficient: 0.98; 95% CI: 0.86-1.1 p-value < 0.001). The mixed-effects model demonstrated good overall predictive performance (conditional R² = 0.80), although substantial inter-individual variability was observed (marginal R² = 0.40). The AUC for detecting high or low inspiratory effort was 0.91 (95% CI: 0.87-0.94), and 0.91 (95% CI: 0.88-0.94) respectively. Agreement analysis revealed proportional bias with wide limits of agreement.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The PTP<sub>POCC</sub> index showed good performance for identifying extremes of respiratory effort in mechanically ventilated patients. Despite limited individual agreement, its strong association and high specificity may make it a useful tool for confirming very low or excessively high inspiratory effort and for identifying patients at risk of over or under assistance.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov under the identifier NCT06040138 ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06040138 ), first submitted date 2023-09-05.</p>","PeriodicalId":9190,"journal":{"name":"BMC Anesthesiology","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13560233/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-026-04113-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Monitoring respiratory effort is crucial to prevent ventilator-induced lung injury and diaphragmatic dysfunction, but esophageal manometry (the gold standard) is invasive an can be cumbersome. The airway occlusion pressure (ΔPOCC) correlates with inspiratory effort but does not account for inspiratory time (Ti) or respiratory rate (RR). We aimed to validate a novel non-invasive index (PTPPOCC) that combines ΔPOCC, Ti, and RR to estimate the esophageal pressure-time product (PTPESO).

Methods: We conducted a prospective, multicenter, physiological, crossover study. Three levels of inspiratory pressure (5, 10, and 15 cm H₂O) were randomly applied in patients with invasive mechanical ventilation in pressure support mode. We simultaneously measured PTPESO and calculated the non-invasive PTPPOCC (PTPPOCC-min = (0.75 × ΔPOCC × Ti / 2) × RR). Association was assessed using linear mixed-effects models. Diagnostic accuracy for detecting high (PTPESO >150 cmH₂O·s·min⁻¹) and low (PTPESO <50 cmH₂O·s·min⁻¹) inspiratory effort was evaluated using ROC curves.

Results: A total of 49 patients were analyzed. A significant positive association was found between PTPESO-min and PTPPOCC-min (regression coefficient: 0.98; 95% CI: 0.86-1.1 p-value < 0.001). The mixed-effects model demonstrated good overall predictive performance (conditional R² = 0.80), although substantial inter-individual variability was observed (marginal R² = 0.40). The AUC for detecting high or low inspiratory effort was 0.91 (95% CI: 0.87-0.94), and 0.91 (95% CI: 0.88-0.94) respectively. Agreement analysis revealed proportional bias with wide limits of agreement.

Conclusions: The PTPPOCC index showed good performance for identifying extremes of respiratory effort in mechanically ventilated patients. Despite limited individual agreement, its strong association and high specificity may make it a useful tool for confirming very low or excessively high inspiratory effort and for identifying patients at risk of over or under assistance.

Trial registration: The study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov under the identifier NCT06040138 ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06040138 ), first submitted date 2023-09-05.

使用气道闭塞压(PTPPOCC研究)通过压力时间积测量监测呼吸努力。
背景:监测呼吸努力对预防呼吸机引起的肺损伤和膈功能障碍至关重要,但食管压力测量(金标准)是有创的,可能很麻烦。气道闭塞压(ΔPOCC)与吸气力相关,但不能解释吸气时间(Ti)或呼吸速率(RR)。我们旨在验证一种新的无创指数(PTPPOCC),该指数结合ΔPOCC、Ti和RR来估计食管压力-时间产物(PTPESO)。方法:我们进行了一项前瞻性、多中心、生理、交叉研究。有创机械通气患者在压力支持模式下随机施加3个水平的吸气压力(5、10、15 cm H₂O)。同时测量PTPESO并计算无创PTPPOCC (PTPPOCC-min = (0.75 × ΔPOCC × Ti / 2) × RR)。使用线性混合效应模型评估相关性。检测高(PTPESO - 150 cmH₂O·s·min)和低(PTPESO - 150 cmH₂O·s·min - 1)的诊断准确性结果:共分析了49例患者。PTPESO-min与PTPPOCC-min存在显著正相关(回归系数:0.98;95% CI: 0.86-1.1 p值)结论:PTPPOCC指数对机械通气患者的极端呼吸努力有较好的识别效果。尽管个体一致性有限,但其强相关性和高特异性可能使其成为一种有用的工具,用于确认非常低或过高的吸气努力,并用于识别有过度或不足辅助风险的患者。试验注册:该研究在ClinicalTrials.gov上注册,标识符为NCT06040138 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06040138),首次提交日期为2023-09-05。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Anesthesiology
BMC Anesthesiology ANESTHESIOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.50%
发文量
349
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Anesthesiology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of anesthesiology, critical care, perioperative care and pain management, including clinical and experimental research into anesthetic mechanisms, administration and efficacy, technology and monitoring, and associated economic issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书