Association between pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block and postoperative inflammatory indices and analgesic outcomes in total hip arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Anna Perek, Serkan Tulgar, Tomasz Reysner, Katrzyna Wieczorowska-Tobis, Paweł Pietraszek, Justyna Marszałek-Buko, Malgorzata Reysner
{"title":"Association between pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block and postoperative inflammatory indices and analgesic outcomes in total hip arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Anna Perek, Serkan Tulgar, Tomasz Reysner, Katrzyna Wieczorowska-Tobis, Paweł Pietraszek, Justyna Marszałek-Buko, Malgorzata Reysner","doi":"10.1186/s12871-026-04084-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Total hip arthroplasty (THA) induces a pronounced postoperative inflammatory response that contributes to pain, increased opioid requirements, and delayed recovery, particularly in older adults. Although the pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block provides effective analgesia, its impact on systemic inflammation remains insufficiently defined.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective, randomized, quadruple-blinded controlled trial, patients aged ≥ 60 years undergoing elective unilateral THA performed under spinal anesthesia were randomized (1:1) to receive an ultrasound-guided PENG block with ropivacaine or a sham block. The primary outcome was the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) at 12 h postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) at 12, 24, and 48 h, postoperative pain scores, time to first opioid administration, and cumulative opioid consumption within 48 h.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty patients completed the study (30 per group). Baseline inflammatory markers were comparable between groups. At 12 h, NLR was significantly lower in the PENG group than in the control group (5.98 ± 1.42 vs. 9.60 ± 1.83; adjusted p < 0.0001), with sustained reductions at 24 h (2.47 ± 0.77 vs. 5.71 ± 1.74; adjusted p < 0.0001) and 48 h (1.84 ± 0.71 vs. 3.53 ± 1.08; adjusted p < 0.0001). PLR was also significantly lower in the PENG group at all postoperative time points (all adjusted p < 0.0001), with a significantly different postoperative trajectory between groups over time. The PENG block significantly prolonged time to first opioid administration (15.0 ± 1.5 vs. 9.3 ± 1.7 h; p < 0.001) and reduced cumulative 48-h opioid consumption (13.2 ± 2.7 vs. 20.8 ± 3.2 mg; p < 0.001). Pain scores at rest and during mobilization were consistently lower in the PENG group throughout the first 24 h.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In older adults undergoing THA, the PENG block was associated with lower postoperative inflammatory indices, improved pain control, and reduced opioid requirements. Because NLR and PLR are indirect inflammatory markers, these findings should be interpreted cautiously and viewed as associative rather than mechanistic. Further studies are required to determine whether these physiological differences translate into improved clinical recovery outcomes.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT07023107), registered on 8 June 2025.</p>","PeriodicalId":9190,"journal":{"name":"BMC Anesthesiology","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13560387/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-026-04084-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Total hip arthroplasty (THA) induces a pronounced postoperative inflammatory response that contributes to pain, increased opioid requirements, and delayed recovery, particularly in older adults. Although the pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block provides effective analgesia, its impact on systemic inflammation remains insufficiently defined.

Methods: In this prospective, randomized, quadruple-blinded controlled trial, patients aged ≥ 60 years undergoing elective unilateral THA performed under spinal anesthesia were randomized (1:1) to receive an ultrasound-guided PENG block with ropivacaine or a sham block. The primary outcome was the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) at 12 h postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) at 12, 24, and 48 h, postoperative pain scores, time to first opioid administration, and cumulative opioid consumption within 48 h.

Results: Sixty patients completed the study (30 per group). Baseline inflammatory markers were comparable between groups. At 12 h, NLR was significantly lower in the PENG group than in the control group (5.98 ± 1.42 vs. 9.60 ± 1.83; adjusted p < 0.0001), with sustained reductions at 24 h (2.47 ± 0.77 vs. 5.71 ± 1.74; adjusted p < 0.0001) and 48 h (1.84 ± 0.71 vs. 3.53 ± 1.08; adjusted p < 0.0001). PLR was also significantly lower in the PENG group at all postoperative time points (all adjusted p < 0.0001), with a significantly different postoperative trajectory between groups over time. The PENG block significantly prolonged time to first opioid administration (15.0 ± 1.5 vs. 9.3 ± 1.7 h; p < 0.001) and reduced cumulative 48-h opioid consumption (13.2 ± 2.7 vs. 20.8 ± 3.2 mg; p < 0.001). Pain scores at rest and during mobilization were consistently lower in the PENG group throughout the first 24 h.

Conclusions: In older adults undergoing THA, the PENG block was associated with lower postoperative inflammatory indices, improved pain control, and reduced opioid requirements. Because NLR and PLR are indirect inflammatory markers, these findings should be interpreted cautiously and viewed as associative rather than mechanistic. Further studies are required to determine whether these physiological differences translate into improved clinical recovery outcomes.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT07023107), registered on 8 June 2025.

全髋关节置换术中囊周神经阻滞与术后炎症指数和镇痛结果的关系:一项随机对照试验
背景:全髋关节置换术(THA)引起明显的术后炎症反应,导致疼痛、阿片类药物需求增加和恢复延迟,特别是在老年人中。尽管囊周神经阻滞(PENG)提供了有效的镇痛,但其对全身炎症的影响仍不明确。方法:在这项前瞻性、随机、四盲对照试验中,年龄≥60岁的患者在脊髓麻醉下接受选择性单侧THA,随机(1:1)接受超声引导下罗哌卡因彭阻滞或假阻滞。术后12小时中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)为主要观察指标。次要结果包括12,24和48小时的血小板与淋巴细胞比率(PLR),术后疼痛评分,第一次给药的时间,以及48小时内阿片类药物的累积消耗。结果:60例患者完成了研究(每组30例)。各组之间的基线炎症标志物具有可比性。12小时时,PENG组NLR明显低于对照组(5.98±1.42 vs. 9.60±1.83)。结论:在接受THA的老年人中,PENG阻滞与较低的术后炎症指数、改善的疼痛控制和减少阿片类药物需求相关。由于NLR和PLR是间接炎症标志物,因此这些发现应谨慎解释,并将其视为相关性而非机械性。需要进一步的研究来确定这些生理差异是否转化为改善的临床恢复结果。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT07023107),于2025年6月8日注册。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Anesthesiology
BMC Anesthesiology ANESTHESIOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.50%
发文量
349
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Anesthesiology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of anesthesiology, critical care, perioperative care and pain management, including clinical and experimental research into anesthetic mechanisms, administration and efficacy, technology and monitoring, and associated economic issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书