A Survey on the Evolution and Future Trajectory of Flow Cytometry Analysis

IF 30.4 1区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS
Tony Xu, Givanna Putri, Aaron Chuah, Robin Vlieger, Anne Brüstle
{"title":"A Survey on the Evolution and Future Trajectory of Flow Cytometry Analysis","authors":"Tony Xu, Givanna Putri, Aaron Chuah, Robin Vlieger, Anne Brüstle","doi":"10.1145/3845984","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Flow cytometry is a powerful analytical technique that generates high-dimensional single-cell data widely used in biological research and clinical diagnostics. This survey traces the evolution of flow cytometry analysis from traditional manual gating to modern algorithmic approaches and explores emerging deep-learning (DL) paradigms. We delineate three distinct analysis paradigms: traditional (manual gating), modern (algorithm-assisted population identification), and future (direct cell-to-sample DL models). While the modern paradigm employs sophisticated computational methods to identify cell populations and derive features, the emerging future paradigm bypasses discrete population identification entirely, utilizing DL to directly connect cellular information to sample-level insights. We discuss key technical challenges including batch effects, panel variations, and data availability that currently limit widespread adoption of more advanced analytical approaches. The survey also examines promising solutions such as transfer learning, data augmentation, and self-supervised learning techniques. As flow cytometry technology continues to advance, particularly with spectral cytometry enabling higher-dimensional analysis, these computational methods will become increasingly essential for extracting maximum biological insight from complex datasets. The development of standardized data repositories, robust batch correction tools, and comprehensive benchmarking frameworks will be crucial for realizing the full potential of these advanced analytical approaches.","PeriodicalId":50926,"journal":{"name":"ACM Computing Surveys","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":30.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Computing Surveys","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3845984","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Flow cytometry is a powerful analytical technique that generates high-dimensional single-cell data widely used in biological research and clinical diagnostics. This survey traces the evolution of flow cytometry analysis from traditional manual gating to modern algorithmic approaches and explores emerging deep-learning (DL) paradigms. We delineate three distinct analysis paradigms: traditional (manual gating), modern (algorithm-assisted population identification), and future (direct cell-to-sample DL models). While the modern paradigm employs sophisticated computational methods to identify cell populations and derive features, the emerging future paradigm bypasses discrete population identification entirely, utilizing DL to directly connect cellular information to sample-level insights. We discuss key technical challenges including batch effects, panel variations, and data availability that currently limit widespread adoption of more advanced analytical approaches. The survey also examines promising solutions such as transfer learning, data augmentation, and self-supervised learning techniques. As flow cytometry technology continues to advance, particularly with spectral cytometry enabling higher-dimensional analysis, these computational methods will become increasingly essential for extracting maximum biological insight from complex datasets. The development of standardized data repositories, robust batch correction tools, and comprehensive benchmarking frameworks will be crucial for realizing the full potential of these advanced analytical approaches.
流式细胞术分析的发展和未来发展趋势综述
流式细胞术是一种强大的分析技术,可生成高维单细胞数据,广泛应用于生物学研究和临床诊断。本调查追溯了流式细胞术分析从传统的手动门控到现代算法方法的演变,并探索了新兴的深度学习(DL)范式。我们描述了三种不同的分析范式:传统的(手动门控),现代的(算法辅助种群识别)和未来的(直接细胞到样本的深度分析模型)。虽然现代范式采用复杂的计算方法来识别细胞群体并得出特征,但新兴的未来范式完全绕过离散群体识别,利用深度学习直接将细胞信息与样本级见解联系起来。我们讨论了关键的技术挑战,包括批处理效应、面板变化和数据可用性,这些目前限制了更先进分析方法的广泛采用。该调查还探讨了有前途的解决方案,如迁移学习、数据增强和自我监督学习技术。随着流式细胞术技术的不断进步,特别是光谱细胞术能够实现高维分析,这些计算方法对于从复杂的数据集中提取最大的生物学洞察力将变得越来越重要。标准化数据存储库、健壮的批处理校正工具和全面的基准测试框架的开发对于实现这些高级分析方法的全部潜力至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACM Computing Surveys
ACM Computing Surveys 工程技术-计算机:理论方法
CiteScore
33.20
自引率
0.60%
发文量
372
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: ACM Computing Surveys is an academic journal that focuses on publishing surveys and tutorials on various areas of computing research and practice. The journal aims to provide comprehensive and easily understandable articles that guide readers through the literature and help them understand topics outside their specialties. In terms of impact, CSUR has a high reputation with a 2022 Impact Factor of 16.6. It is ranked 3rd out of 111 journals in the field of Computer Science Theory & Methods. ACM Computing Surveys is indexed and abstracted in various services, including AI2 Semantic Scholar, Baidu, Clarivate/ISI: JCR, CNKI, DeepDyve, DTU, EBSCO: EDS/HOST, and IET Inspec, among others.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书