Local large language model-guided optimization for prostate radiotherapy planning

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Medical physics Pub Date : 2026-09-10 DOI:10.1002/mp.70654
Humza Nusrat, Bing Luo, Hassan Bagher-Ebadian, Ryan Hall, Joshua Kim, Anthony Doemer, Khaled Adil, Mohamed Elsheikh, Aharon Feldman, Benjamin Movsas, Kundan Thind
{"title":"Local large language model-guided optimization for prostate radiotherapy planning","authors":"Humza Nusrat,&nbsp;Bing Luo,&nbsp;Hassan Bagher-Ebadian,&nbsp;Ryan Hall,&nbsp;Joshua Kim,&nbsp;Anthony Doemer,&nbsp;Khaled Adil,&nbsp;Mohamed Elsheikh,&nbsp;Aharon Feldman,&nbsp;Benjamin Movsas,&nbsp;Kundan Thind","doi":"10.1002/mp.70654","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Radiotherapy planning is time-intensive, iterative, and operator-dependent. Locally deployed large language-model agents may support planning automation while avoiding transmission of patient data to external model providers.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>The purpose of this work was to develop and evaluate SAGE, a locally deployed LLM agent for autonomous VMAT optimization-priority tuning, and to investigate the impact of model size (8B vs. 70B) and intra-case memory implemented through retrieval augmentation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The SAGE agent (Llama 3.1 8B/70B) was interfaced with a clinical TPS to tune optimization priority values for 17 retrospective prostate cancer patients (60 Gy/20fx). All SAGE priority values were initialized to 1, while the study-defined optimization objective set and beam geometry were held fixed. We compared four agent variants (8B, 70B, 8B-RAG, 70B-RAG) to the clinical plan using paired Wilcoxon tests with FDR control.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>No statistically significant difference in target (PTV V58.5 Gy) coverage was observed between SAGE variants and clinical plans. The 70B-RAG agent significantly improved penile bulb sparing (V22Gy) over clinical plans (<i>p</i> = 0.014). Enabling intra-case memory provided a statistically significant improvement in penile bulb sparing, while no significant effect was observed from model size alone. While clinical plans were statistically better for some OARs, all SAGE 70B-RAG plans remained clinically acceptable. The most complex version of SAGE (70B-RAG) completed ten autonomous iterations in a median compute time of 45 min (IQR: 34–51). For reference, the clinical planning workflow turnaround (ARIA-recorded task duration) median time was 2700 min (IQR: 2040–3060).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>This proof-of-concept study demonstrates that a local LLM agent can autonomously tune optimization priority values to generate clinically acceptable prostate VMAT plans within a fixed, study-defined objective space. Intra-case memory produced a statistically significant, endpoint-specific improvement (penile bulb V22Gy). These findings suggest that smaller, efficient models may be viable for constrained treatment-planning optimization tasks.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":18384,"journal":{"name":"Medical physics","volume":"53 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/mp.70654","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mp.70654","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Radiotherapy planning is time-intensive, iterative, and operator-dependent. Locally deployed large language-model agents may support planning automation while avoiding transmission of patient data to external model providers.

Purpose

The purpose of this work was to develop and evaluate SAGE, a locally deployed LLM agent for autonomous VMAT optimization-priority tuning, and to investigate the impact of model size (8B vs. 70B) and intra-case memory implemented through retrieval augmentation.

Methods

The SAGE agent (Llama 3.1 8B/70B) was interfaced with a clinical TPS to tune optimization priority values for 17 retrospective prostate cancer patients (60 Gy/20fx). All SAGE priority values were initialized to 1, while the study-defined optimization objective set and beam geometry were held fixed. We compared four agent variants (8B, 70B, 8B-RAG, 70B-RAG) to the clinical plan using paired Wilcoxon tests with FDR control.

Results

No statistically significant difference in target (PTV V58.5 Gy) coverage was observed between SAGE variants and clinical plans. The 70B-RAG agent significantly improved penile bulb sparing (V22Gy) over clinical plans (p = 0.014). Enabling intra-case memory provided a statistically significant improvement in penile bulb sparing, while no significant effect was observed from model size alone. While clinical plans were statistically better for some OARs, all SAGE 70B-RAG plans remained clinically acceptable. The most complex version of SAGE (70B-RAG) completed ten autonomous iterations in a median compute time of 45 min (IQR: 34–51). For reference, the clinical planning workflow turnaround (ARIA-recorded task duration) median time was 2700 min (IQR: 2040–3060).

Conclusions

This proof-of-concept study demonstrates that a local LLM agent can autonomously tune optimization priority values to generate clinically acceptable prostate VMAT plans within a fixed, study-defined objective space. Intra-case memory produced a statistically significant, endpoint-specific improvement (penile bulb V22Gy). These findings suggest that smaller, efficient models may be viable for constrained treatment-planning optimization tasks.

局部大语言模型引导前列腺放疗规划优化。
背景:放疗计划是费时的,反复的,依赖于操作者。本地部署的大型语言模型代理可以支持规划自动化,同时避免将患者数据传输到外部模型提供者。目的:本研究的目的是开发和评估SAGE,一种用于自主VMAT优化优先级调优的本地部署LLM代理,并研究通过检索增强实现的模型大小(8B vs. 70B)和案例内内存的影响。方法:将SAGE药物(Llama 3.1 8B/70B)与临床TPS相结合,对17例回顾性前列腺癌患者(60 Gy/20fx)调整优化优先值。所有SAGE优先级值初始化为1,同时研究定义的优化目标集和光束几何形状保持固定。我们将四种药物变体(8B、70B、8B- rag、70B- rag)与临床计划进行比较,采用配对的Wilcoxon试验与FDR对照。结果:SAGE变体与临床方案在靶区(PTV V58.5 Gy)覆盖率上无统计学差异。与临床方案相比,70B-RAG可显著改善阴茎球节约(V22Gy) (p = 0.014)。启用病例内记忆提供了统计学上显着的阴茎球节约改善,而仅从模型大小没有观察到显着影响。虽然临床计划在统计上对一些桨更好,但所有SAGE 70B-RAG计划在临床上仍然是可接受的。最复杂版本的SAGE (70B-RAG)在平均45分钟的计算时间内完成了10次自主迭代(IQR: 34-51)。作为参考,临床计划工作流程周转(aria记录的任务持续时间)中位时间为2700分钟(IQR: 2040-3060)。结论:这项概念验证研究表明,局部LLM代理可以在固定的、研究定义的目标空间内自主调整优化优先级值,以生成临床可接受的前列腺VMAT计划。病例内记忆产生了统计学上显著的、终点特异性的改善(阴茎球V22Gy)。这些发现表明,更小、更有效的模型可能适用于约束治疗计划优化任务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medical physics
Medical physics 医学-核医学
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
15.80%
发文量
660
审稿时长
1.7 months
期刊介绍: Medical Physics publishes original, high impact physics, imaging science, and engineering research that advances patient diagnosis and therapy through contributions in 1) Basic science developments with high potential for clinical translation 2) Clinical applications of cutting edge engineering and physics innovations 3) Broadly applicable and innovative clinical physics developments Medical Physics is a journal of global scope and reach. By publishing in Medical Physics your research will reach an international, multidisciplinary audience including practicing medical physicists as well as physics- and engineering based translational scientists. We work closely with authors of promising articles to improve their quality.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书