Outcomes From the Use of Cefazolin for Surgical Prophylaxis in Patients Allergic to Penicillin.

Megan Passalacqua, Christopher Knefelkamp, Haylie Lohmar, Kevin Kniery, Carmen Tichindelean
{"title":"Outcomes From the Use of Cefazolin for Surgical Prophylaxis in Patients Allergic to Penicillin.","authors":"Megan Passalacqua, Christopher Knefelkamp, Haylie Lohmar, Kevin Kniery, Carmen Tichindelean","doi":"10.12788/fp.0675","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>For surgical prophylaxis, alternatives to cefazolin are frequently used in patients with penicillin allergy due to the risk of cross-reactivity. This study investigated whether an evidence-based prescribing tool would result in an increased number of patients with a documented penicillin allergy receiving cefazolin for periprocedural antibiotic prophylaxis without an increase in allergic reactions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center, retrospective chart review analyzed patients with a documented penicillin allergy who received periprocedural antibiotics between February 1, 2023, and January 31, 2024. The primary objective was to determine the incidence of allergic reactions in patients with a documented penicillin allergy who received cefazolin perioperatively. Secondary outcomes included the appropriateness of antibiotic regimens in congruence with American System of Health Pharmacists (ASHP) recommendations, incidence of surgical site infections (SSIs), incidence of adverse drug reactions in those with a history of anaphylaxis vs nonanaphylaxis allergy, incidence of allergic reactions requiring interventions, and incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 197 surgical procedures in patients with a documented penicillin allergy. No allergic reactions were reported. In the cefazolin group, 126 antibiotic regimens (99.2%) were in congruence with ASHP recommendations; all regimens were in congruence with ASHP recommendations in the cefazolin plus gentamicin group; and 58 (86.6%) were in congruence with ASHP recommendations in the other antibiotic group. There was no incidence of SSI in the cefazolin or cefazolin plus gentamicin group, and 3 incidents in the other antibiotic group. One instance of AKI was reported in the cefazolin group, and none were reported in cefazolin plus gentamicin or the other antibiotic group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study reported similar outcomes to previously published research, which supports the perioperative use of cefazolin in patients allergic to penicillin, including those with a history of anaphylaxis.</p>","PeriodicalId":94009,"journal":{"name":"Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS","volume":"43 3","pages":"100-104"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13557109/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12788/fp.0675","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: For surgical prophylaxis, alternatives to cefazolin are frequently used in patients with penicillin allergy due to the risk of cross-reactivity. This study investigated whether an evidence-based prescribing tool would result in an increased number of patients with a documented penicillin allergy receiving cefazolin for periprocedural antibiotic prophylaxis without an increase in allergic reactions.

Methods: This single-center, retrospective chart review analyzed patients with a documented penicillin allergy who received periprocedural antibiotics between February 1, 2023, and January 31, 2024. The primary objective was to determine the incidence of allergic reactions in patients with a documented penicillin allergy who received cefazolin perioperatively. Secondary outcomes included the appropriateness of antibiotic regimens in congruence with American System of Health Pharmacists (ASHP) recommendations, incidence of surgical site infections (SSIs), incidence of adverse drug reactions in those with a history of anaphylaxis vs nonanaphylaxis allergy, incidence of allergic reactions requiring interventions, and incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI).

Results: There were 197 surgical procedures in patients with a documented penicillin allergy. No allergic reactions were reported. In the cefazolin group, 126 antibiotic regimens (99.2%) were in congruence with ASHP recommendations; all regimens were in congruence with ASHP recommendations in the cefazolin plus gentamicin group; and 58 (86.6%) were in congruence with ASHP recommendations in the other antibiotic group. There was no incidence of SSI in the cefazolin or cefazolin plus gentamicin group, and 3 incidents in the other antibiotic group. One instance of AKI was reported in the cefazolin group, and none were reported in cefazolin plus gentamicin or the other antibiotic group.

Conclusions: This study reported similar outcomes to previously published research, which supports the perioperative use of cefazolin in patients allergic to penicillin, including those with a history of anaphylaxis.

头孢唑林用于青霉素过敏患者手术预防的结果。
背景:对于外科预防,由于交叉反应的风险,头孢唑林的替代品经常用于青霉素过敏患者。本研究调查了循证处方工具是否会导致有青霉素过敏记录的患者接受头孢唑林围手术期抗生素预防而不增加过敏反应。方法:该单中心回顾性图表分析了2023年2月1日至2024年1月31日期间接受围手术期抗生素治疗的青霉素过敏患者。主要目的是确定有青霉素过敏记录的患者围手术期接受头孢唑林的过敏反应发生率。次要结局包括符合美国卫生药剂师系统(ASHP)建议的抗生素治疗方案的适宜性、手术部位感染(ssi)的发生率、有过敏反应与非过敏反应过敏史的患者的药物不良反应的发生率、需要干预的过敏反应的发生率以及急性肾损伤(AKI)的发生率。结果:197例青霉素过敏患者接受了外科手术。无过敏反应报告。在头孢唑林组中,126种抗生素方案(99.2%)符合ASHP的建议;头孢唑林加庆大霉素组的所有方案均符合美国空气健康协会的建议;其他抗生素组58例(86.6%)与ASHP推荐值一致。头孢唑林和头孢唑林联合庆大霉素组无SSI发生率,其他抗生素组有3例。头孢唑林组报告1例AKI,头孢唑林加庆大霉素或其他抗生素组未报告AKI。结论:本研究报告的结果与先前发表的研究相似,支持对青霉素过敏的患者围手术期使用头孢唑林,包括有过敏史的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书