A Scoping Review on Bone Mass Status in Individuals with Transfemoral Amputation.

IF 0.7 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS
Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2026-05-19 DOI:10.1097/JPO.0000000000000635
Jose L Zavaleta-Ruiz, Matthew J Major, Pankaj Pankaj
{"title":"A Scoping Review on Bone Mass Status in Individuals with Transfemoral Amputation.","authors":"Jose L Zavaleta-Ruiz, Matthew J Major, Pankaj Pankaj","doi":"10.1097/JPO.0000000000000635","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Deterioration of bone mineral density (BMD) in the residual femur after a transfemoral amputation (TFA) has been reported over the past five decades, with various potential explanations described in the literature. BMD loss is a critical risk factor of fracture and hence an important clinical concern for prosthesis users.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This scoping review audited in vivo imaging studies that focused on BMD in individuals with TFA, with the aim to synthesize the status of knowledge on this topic, report on the mechanisms related to BMD status as hypothesized in the reviewed literature, and review BMD outcomes separately for prosthetic socket and bone-anchored suspension.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three databases (Scopus, PubMed, and Web of Science) were searched on December 1, 2024. Search keywords covered terms that reference bone mineralization (BMD, osteopenia, and osteoporosis) and TFA. Data were extracted for analysis and grouped according to reported prosthesis suspension for analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 244 articles were screened, with 20 ultimately reviewed. Articles were published between 1969 and 2024. Fourteen articles reported the use of socket prosthesis and six used bone-anchored devices. The former group consistently reported BMD loss, while the latter presented maintenance or improvements. The socket prosthesis cohort was younger in age compared to bone anchored (range 24-73 vs. 47-58 years). Proposed reasons for BMD loss included disuse atrophy, bedrest post-surgery, gait asymmetry, and prosthesis influence.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Articles reporting BMD status using socket prosthesis consistently reported demineralization despite interventions, with no consensus on the mechanical cause of BMD loss. Further, the bone-anchored group tended to demonstrate improvements in limb loading symmetry during ambulation and higher levels of bone loading compared to prosthetic socket use.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>The residual femur in persons with TFA has demonstrated bone demineralization, which appears to be less prevalent in bone-anchored devices compared to socket use. These findings warrant further analysis of the effects of prosthetic socket use on bone demineralization in persons with TFA.</p>","PeriodicalId":53702,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics","volume":"38 4","pages":"e123-e132"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13557486/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JPO.0000000000000635","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Deterioration of bone mineral density (BMD) in the residual femur after a transfemoral amputation (TFA) has been reported over the past five decades, with various potential explanations described in the literature. BMD loss is a critical risk factor of fracture and hence an important clinical concern for prosthesis users.

Objectives: This scoping review audited in vivo imaging studies that focused on BMD in individuals with TFA, with the aim to synthesize the status of knowledge on this topic, report on the mechanisms related to BMD status as hypothesized in the reviewed literature, and review BMD outcomes separately for prosthetic socket and bone-anchored suspension.

Methods: Three databases (Scopus, PubMed, and Web of Science) were searched on December 1, 2024. Search keywords covered terms that reference bone mineralization (BMD, osteopenia, and osteoporosis) and TFA. Data were extracted for analysis and grouped according to reported prosthesis suspension for analysis.

Results: In total, 244 articles were screened, with 20 ultimately reviewed. Articles were published between 1969 and 2024. Fourteen articles reported the use of socket prosthesis and six used bone-anchored devices. The former group consistently reported BMD loss, while the latter presented maintenance or improvements. The socket prosthesis cohort was younger in age compared to bone anchored (range 24-73 vs. 47-58 years). Proposed reasons for BMD loss included disuse atrophy, bedrest post-surgery, gait asymmetry, and prosthesis influence.

Conclusions: Articles reporting BMD status using socket prosthesis consistently reported demineralization despite interventions, with no consensus on the mechanical cause of BMD loss. Further, the bone-anchored group tended to demonstrate improvements in limb loading symmetry during ambulation and higher levels of bone loading compared to prosthetic socket use.

Clinical relevance: The residual femur in persons with TFA has demonstrated bone demineralization, which appears to be less prevalent in bone-anchored devices compared to socket use. These findings warrant further analysis of the effects of prosthetic socket use on bone demineralization in persons with TFA.

经股骨截肢患者骨量状况的综述。
背景:在过去的五十年中,关于经股截肢(TFA)后残余股骨骨密度(BMD)恶化的报道已经有了,文献中描述了各种可能的解释。骨密度损失是骨折的重要危险因素,因此是义肢使用者临床关注的重要问题。目的:本综述综述了关注TFA患者骨密度的体内成像研究,旨在综合这一主题的知识现状,报道文献中假设的骨密度状态相关机制,并分别回顾假体窝和骨锚定悬吊的骨密度结果。方法:于2024年12月1日检索Scopus、PubMed和Web of Science三个数据库。搜索关键词涵盖了参考骨矿化(骨密度、骨质减少和骨质疏松)和TFA的术语。提取数据进行分析,并根据报道的假体悬吊情况进行分组分析。结果:共筛选244篇文献,最终评审20篇。文章发表于1969年至2024年之间。14篇文章报道了使用套孔假体和6篇使用骨锚定装置。前一组一直报告骨密度下降,而后者则保持或改善。与骨锚固定组相比,使用骨臼假体的患者年龄更年轻(范围24-73岁vs 47-58岁)。BMD损失的原因包括失用性萎缩、术后卧床、步态不对称和假体的影响。结论:报道骨密度状况的文章一致地报道了尽管有干预,但骨密度下降的机械原因没有达成共识。此外,与使用假体窝相比,骨锚定组在行走时的肢体负荷对称性和更高的骨负荷水平上有所改善。临床相关性:TFA患者的残余股骨显示出骨脱矿,与使用套孔相比,骨锚定装置中骨脱矿的发生率较低。这些发现为进一步分析使用假体窝对TFA患者骨脱矿的影响提供了依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics
Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics Medicine-Rehabilitation
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
16.70%
发文量
59
期刊介绍: Published quarterly by the AAOP, JPO: Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics provides information on new devices, fitting and fabrication techniques, and patient management experiences. The focus is on prosthetics and orthotics, with timely reports from related fields such as orthopaedic research, occupational therapy, physical therapy, orthopaedic surgery, amputation surgery, physical medicine, biomedical engineering, psychology, ethics, and gait analysis. Each issue contains research-based articles reviewed and approved by a highly qualified editorial board and an Academy self-study quiz offering two PCE''s.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书