Osteochondral flake refixation using the parachute technique yields favourable clinical and radiological outcomes following acute patellar dislocation: A case series at short- to mid-term follow-up

IF 3.2 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Romed Peter Vieider, Yannick Ehmann, Svenja Höger, Lorenz Fritsch, Charlotte Schweitzer, Armin Runer, Alexander Wolfgang Marka, Sebastian Siebenlist, Julian Mehl
{"title":"Osteochondral flake refixation using the parachute technique yields favourable clinical and radiological outcomes following acute patellar dislocation: A case series at short- to mid-term follow-up","authors":"Romed Peter Vieider,&nbsp;Yannick Ehmann,&nbsp;Svenja Höger,&nbsp;Lorenz Fritsch,&nbsp;Charlotte Schweitzer,&nbsp;Armin Runer,&nbsp;Alexander Wolfgang Marka,&nbsp;Sebastian Siebenlist,&nbsp;Julian Mehl","doi":"10.1002/jeo2.70894","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>To evaluate short- to mid-term clinical and radiological outcomes following osteochondral flake refixation with transpatellar, absorbable sutures (parachute technique) combined with concomitant medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction after acute patellar dislocation. It was hypothesized that the parachute technique would yield favourable clinical and functional outcomes and demonstrate good osteochondral integration on radiographic follow-up.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A retrospective case series was conducted, including patients who underwent osteochondral flake refixation using the parachute technique following acute patellar dislocation between January 2012 and November 2023 at a minimum follow-up of 24 months. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Tegner Activity Scale (TAS), Kujala Score, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective score and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS). Radiological outcomes were evaluated using the Magnetic Resonance Observation of Cartilage Repair Tissue (MOCART) 2.0 knee score on 3.0-T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) by three independent raters and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was assessed.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Of 26 identified patients, 20 (77%) were available at final follow-up (mean age 20.8 ± 5.3 years; mean follow-up 62.2 ± 20.5 months; mean defect size 2.8 ± 1.5 cm<sup>2</sup>). Clinical outcome scores resulted in a mean VAS of 0.5 ± 1.6, TAS of 6 (interquartile range 4–7), Kujala Score of 89.4 ± 12.5, IKDC of 86.7 ± 14.3 and total KOOS of 87.8 ± 14.1. Of all patients, 95% were satisfied with the overall result, and 90% would be willing to undergo the procedure again if necessary. Two patients (10%) required revision surgery (one patella re-dislocation, one failed osteochondral integration). The mean MOCART 2.0 score was 84 ± 8 (range: 75–95), indicating good to excellent osteochondral integration. Inter-rater reliability across the three raters was almost perfect (ICC = 0.84; 95% confidence interval 0.79–0.96).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The parachute technique yields favourable clinical and functional outcomes at short- to mid-term follow-up and demonstrates good to excellent osteochondral integration on MRI following acute patellar dislocation. The technique represents a reliable, simple and single-stage option for the treatment of retropatellar osteochondral flake fractures.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Level of Evidence</h3>\n \n <p>Level IV, case series.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":36909,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics","volume":"13 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13556305/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jeo2.70894","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate short- to mid-term clinical and radiological outcomes following osteochondral flake refixation with transpatellar, absorbable sutures (parachute technique) combined with concomitant medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction after acute patellar dislocation. It was hypothesized that the parachute technique would yield favourable clinical and functional outcomes and demonstrate good osteochondral integration on radiographic follow-up.

Methods

A retrospective case series was conducted, including patients who underwent osteochondral flake refixation using the parachute technique following acute patellar dislocation between January 2012 and November 2023 at a minimum follow-up of 24 months. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Tegner Activity Scale (TAS), Kujala Score, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective score and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS). Radiological outcomes were evaluated using the Magnetic Resonance Observation of Cartilage Repair Tissue (MOCART) 2.0 knee score on 3.0-T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) by three independent raters and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was assessed.

Results

Of 26 identified patients, 20 (77%) were available at final follow-up (mean age 20.8 ± 5.3 years; mean follow-up 62.2 ± 20.5 months; mean defect size 2.8 ± 1.5 cm2). Clinical outcome scores resulted in a mean VAS of 0.5 ± 1.6, TAS of 6 (interquartile range 4–7), Kujala Score of 89.4 ± 12.5, IKDC of 86.7 ± 14.3 and total KOOS of 87.8 ± 14.1. Of all patients, 95% were satisfied with the overall result, and 90% would be willing to undergo the procedure again if necessary. Two patients (10%) required revision surgery (one patella re-dislocation, one failed osteochondral integration). The mean MOCART 2.0 score was 84 ± 8 (range: 75–95), indicating good to excellent osteochondral integration. Inter-rater reliability across the three raters was almost perfect (ICC = 0.84; 95% confidence interval 0.79–0.96).

Conclusion

The parachute technique yields favourable clinical and functional outcomes at short- to mid-term follow-up and demonstrates good to excellent osteochondral integration on MRI following acute patellar dislocation. The technique represents a reliable, simple and single-stage option for the treatment of retropatellar osteochondral flake fractures.

Level of Evidence

Level IV, case series.

在急性髌骨脱位后,使用降落伞技术进行骨软骨薄片再固定可获得良好的临床和影像学结果:一个中短期随访的病例系列。
目的:评价急性髌骨脱位后经髌骨可吸收缝合线(降落伞技术)联合髌股内侧韧带(MPFL)重建术的短中期临床和影像学结果。假设降落伞技术将产生良好的临床和功能结果,并在影像学随访中显示良好的骨软骨融合。方法:回顾性研究了一系列病例,包括2012年1月至2023年11月期间在急性髌骨脱位后使用降落伞技术进行骨软骨薄片再固定的患者,随访时间至少为24个月。临床结果采用视觉模拟量表(VAS)、Tegner活动量表(TAS)、Kujala评分、国际膝关节文献委员会(IKDC)主观评分和膝关节损伤和骨关节炎结局评分(oos)进行评估。放射学结果采用软骨修复组织磁共振观察(MOCART),由三个独立评分者在3.0 t磁共振成像(MRI)上评分2.0,并评估组内相关系数(ICC)。结果:在26例患者中,20例(77%)患者在最终随访时仍然存活(平均年龄20.8±5.3岁;平均随访62.2±20.5个月;平均缺陷大小2.8±1.5 cm2)。临床结局评分平均VAS为0.5±1.6,TAS为6(四分位数范围4-7),Kujala评分为89.4±12.5,IKDC为86.7±14.3,总kos为87.8±14.1。在所有患者中,95%的人对整体结果感到满意,90%的人愿意在必要时再次接受手术。2例患者(10%)需要翻修手术(1例髌骨再脱位,1例骨软骨融合失败)。MOCART 2.0平均评分为84±8分(范围:75-95),表明骨软骨融合良好至优异。三个评分者之间的信度几乎是完美的(ICC = 0.84; 95%置信区间为0.79-0.96)。结论:降落伞技术在短期至中期随访中具有良好的临床和功能效果,并在急性髌骨脱位后的MRI上显示良好至优异的骨软骨整合。该技术为治疗髌后骨软骨片状骨折提供了一种可靠、简单和单阶段的选择。证据等级:四级,案例系列。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics
Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.60%
发文量
114
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书