A National Cross-Sectional Survey of Artificial Intelligence Patient Safety Reporting Infrastructure Available to US Nurses.

IF 1.7 4区医学 Q3 NURSING

Journal of nursing care quality Pub Date : 2026-09-10 DOI:10.1097/NCQ.0000000000001011

Gregory A Carter

{"title":"A National Cross-Sectional Survey of Artificial Intelligence Patient Safety Reporting Infrastructure Available to US Nurses.","authors":"Gregory A Carter","doi":"10.1097/NCQ.0000000000001011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Federal artificial intelligence (AI) safety governance depends on clinicians reporting AI-related patient safety concerns, yet national availability of nurse-facing reporting channels and related practice guidance is unknown.Purpose: To characterize formal AI safety reporting channels available to practicing US nurses and correlates of reporting.Methods: A national cross-sectional survey of 1189 practicing US nurses was conducted in June to July 2026.Results: Among 424 nurses who encountered an AI-related patient safety concern, 83 (19.6%) reported no formal channel for reporting it. Non-hospital nurses had higher odds of no channel than hospital-based nurses (odds ratio, 2.54; 95% confidence interval, 1.54-4.19). Where a channel existed, perceived severity predicted reporting (adjusted odds ratio, 2.47; 95% confidence interval, 1.77-3.45).Conclusions: One in 5 nurses with an AI-related patient safety concern lacked reporting infrastructure. Federal AI safety governance presupposes infrastructure that remains uneven across US care settings.","PeriodicalId":16931,"journal":{"name":"Journal of nursing care quality","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of nursing care quality","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/NCQ.0000000000001011","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Federal artificial intelligence (AI) safety governance depends on clinicians reporting AI-related patient safety concerns, yet national availability of nurse-facing reporting channels and related practice guidance is unknown.

Purpose: To characterize formal AI safety reporting channels available to practicing US nurses and correlates of reporting.

Methods: A national cross-sectional survey of 1189 practicing US nurses was conducted in June to July 2026.

Results: Among 424 nurses who encountered an AI-related patient safety concern, 83 (19.6%) reported no formal channel for reporting it. Non-hospital nurses had higher odds of no channel than hospital-based nurses (odds ratio, 2.54; 95% confidence interval, 1.54-4.19). Where a channel existed, perceived severity predicted reporting (adjusted odds ratio, 2.47; 95% confidence interval, 1.77-3.45).

Conclusions: One in 5 nurses with an AI-related patient safety concern lacked reporting infrastructure. Federal AI safety governance presupposes infrastructure that remains uneven across US care settings.

查看原文本刊更多论文

美国护士可用的人工智能患者安全报告基础设施的全国横断面调查。

背景：联邦人工智能（AI）安全治理依赖于临床医生报告与人工智能相关的患者安全问题，但全国面向护士的报告渠道和相关实践指南的可用性尚不清楚。目的：描述美国执业护士可用的正式人工智能安全报告渠道及其报告的相关性。方法：于2026年6月至7月对1189名美国执业护士进行全国横断面调查。结果：在424名遇到人工智能相关患者安全问题的护士中，83名（19.6%）表示没有正式的报告渠道。非医院护士无渠道的几率高于医院护士（优势比为2.54；95%可信区间为1.54 ~ 4.19）。在存在通道的情况下，感知到的严重程度预测了报告（调整后的优势比为2.47；95%可信区间为1.77-3.45）。结论：五分之一的护士对人工智能相关的患者安全问题缺乏报告基础设施。联邦人工智能安全治理的前提是，美国各个医疗机构的基础设施仍然参差不齐。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of nursing care quality 医学-护理

CiteScore

2.40

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

6-12 weeks

期刊介绍： Journal of Nursing Care Quality (JNCQ) is a peer-reviewed journal that provides practicing nurses as well as nurses who have leadership roles in nursing care quality programs with useful information regarding the application of quality principles and concepts in the practice setting. The journal offers a forum for the scholarly discussion of “real world” implementation of quality activities.