Comparing measured sonic boom turbulence-induced variability with computational models for the Carpet Determination in Entirety Measurements (CarpetDIEM) I test campaign.

IF 2.6 2区 物理与天体物理 Q2 ACOUSTICS
Mark C Anderson, William J Doebler, Kent L Gee, Kaylee Nyborg, Alexandra Loubeau
{"title":"Comparing measured sonic boom turbulence-induced variability with computational models for the Carpet Determination in Entirety Measurements (CarpetDIEM) I test campaign.","authors":"Mark C Anderson, William J Doebler, Kent L Gee, Kaylee Nyborg, Alexandra Loubeau","doi":"10.1121/10.0046475","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>When a sonic boom propagates through the atmospheric boundary layer, atmospheric turbulence distorts the waveform, producing stochastic variations over short distances. Accurate prediction of this variability is essential because turbulence affects both waveform characteristics and human-perception metrics used to evaluate supersonic overflights. During NASA's 2019 Carpet Determination in Entirety Measurements I (CarpetDIEM I) flight test campaign, Brigham Young University deployed a 120 m (400 ft) linear array with seven microphones to quantify turbulence-induced variability of sonic boom waveforms, spectra, and metrics. In this study, state-of-the-art models PCBoom and KZKFourier are combined with two weather models, CFSv2 and ERA5, to predict metric variability and compare results with CarpetDIEM I measurements. Depending on the metric and confidence interval considered, prediction success ranges between about 30% and 80%. For the perceived level metric, the prediction successes for the mean and standard deviation were 30%-48% and 52%-65% respectively, depending on the weather model. This compares favorably with the Sonic Booms in Atmospheric Turbulence prediction success results of 45% and 71% for the perceived level mean and standard deviation respectively, using data reported by Stout, Sparrow, and Blanc-Benon [(2021). J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 149, 3250-3260].</p>","PeriodicalId":17168,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Acoustical Society of America","volume":"160 3","pages":"2119-2130"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Acoustical Society of America","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0046475","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

When a sonic boom propagates through the atmospheric boundary layer, atmospheric turbulence distorts the waveform, producing stochastic variations over short distances. Accurate prediction of this variability is essential because turbulence affects both waveform characteristics and human-perception metrics used to evaluate supersonic overflights. During NASA's 2019 Carpet Determination in Entirety Measurements I (CarpetDIEM I) flight test campaign, Brigham Young University deployed a 120 m (400 ft) linear array with seven microphones to quantify turbulence-induced variability of sonic boom waveforms, spectra, and metrics. In this study, state-of-the-art models PCBoom and KZKFourier are combined with two weather models, CFSv2 and ERA5, to predict metric variability and compare results with CarpetDIEM I measurements. Depending on the metric and confidence interval considered, prediction success ranges between about 30% and 80%. For the perceived level metric, the prediction successes for the mean and standard deviation were 30%-48% and 52%-65% respectively, depending on the weather model. This compares favorably with the Sonic Booms in Atmospheric Turbulence prediction success results of 45% and 71% for the perceived level mean and standard deviation respectively, using data reported by Stout, Sparrow, and Blanc-Benon [(2021). J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 149, 3250-3260].

将测量到的音爆湍流引起的变异性与完整测量中的地毯测定(CarpetDIEM) I测试活动的计算模型进行比较。
当音爆通过大气边界层传播时,大气湍流会扭曲波形,在短距离内产生随机变化。准确预测这种可变性至关重要,因为湍流影响波形特性和用于评估超音速飞越的人类感知指标。在美国宇航局2019年的“地毯整体测量测定I”(CarpetDIEM I)飞行测试活动中,杨百翰大学部署了一个120米(400英尺)长的线性阵列,配有7个麦克风,以量化湍流引起的音爆波形、光谱和指标的变化。在这项研究中,最先进的模型PCBoom和KZKFourier与两个天气模型CFSv2和ERA5相结合,预测了度量变率,并将结果与CarpetDIEM I的测量结果进行了比较。根据所考虑的度量和置信区间,预测成功率在30%到80%之间。对于感知水平度量,平均和标准偏差的预测成功率分别为30%-48%和52%-65%,具体取决于天气模型。使用Stout、Sparrow和Blanc-Benon[(2021)]报告的数据,音爆在大气湍流中的预测成功率分别为感知水平均值和标准偏差的45%和71%。j . Acoust。Soc。[j].中国科学:自然科学版。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
16.70%
发文量
1433
审稿时长
4.7 months
期刊介绍: Since 1929 The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America has been the leading source of theoretical and experimental research results in the broad interdisciplinary study of sound. Subject coverage includes: linear and nonlinear acoustics; aeroacoustics, underwater sound and acoustical oceanography; ultrasonics and quantum acoustics; architectural and structural acoustics and vibration; speech, music and noise; psychology and physiology of hearing; engineering acoustics, transduction; bioacoustics, animal bioacoustics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书