Pedicle subtraction osteotomy using ultrasonic bone curette yields fewer durotomies, decreased blood loss: a single surgeon's retrospective experience.

IF 2.3 Q1 Medicine
Journal of spine surgery Pub Date : 2026-08-31 Epub Date: 2026-08-18 DOI:10.21037/jss-2026-1-0020
Benjamin S Succop, Elias Mohammad, Stephen M Bergin, Andrew Abumoussa, Aaron Gelinne, Brett Rocos, Muhammad M Abd-El-Barr, Deb Bhowmick
{"title":"Pedicle subtraction osteotomy using ultrasonic bone curette yields fewer durotomies, decreased blood loss: a single surgeon's retrospective experience.","authors":"Benjamin S Succop, Elias Mohammad, Stephen M Bergin, Andrew Abumoussa, Aaron Gelinne, Brett Rocos, Muhammad M Abd-El-Barr, Deb Bhowmick","doi":"10.21037/jss-2026-1-0020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) is a three column deformity correction technique that can achieve 30 to 40 degrees of correction and is best used for patients with severe rigid sagittal imbalances. Patients report a high degree of satisfaction with quality of life outcomes as a consequence of undergoing PSO. However, complications range between 12% and 40%, including dural tears or neurovascular injuries causing neurological deficit occurring as a consequence of high speed drilling or traction from the spooned retractors used to facilitate exposure. Ultrasonic bone curettes may provide a safer alternative to the drill and retractor approach. The purpose of this retrospective study was to compare outcomes between newer spoonless ultrasonic bone curettage and traditional high speed drilling with paravertebral spoon retractors for pedicle subtraction osteotomies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All patients undergoing PSO with a single surgeon across two academic health institutions in the past eight years were reviewed. Preoperative variables obtained were demographics, prior spine surgeries, and etiology, while intraoperative predictor variables were ultrasonic bone curettage use and number of fused levels. The principal outcomes were surgical: duration of surgery, estimated blood loss (EBL), incidence of durotomies, and neurovascular injury. Secondary outcomes were postoperative: length of stay, need for revision surgery, minor complications, and major complications. Multiple logistic regression was used to evaluate associations with binary outcomes, while multiple linear regression evaluated correlations with continuous outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 175 patients were reviewed. In this sample, 89 (51%) had prior surgeries, and 45 (26%) were treated with the ultrasonic bone curettage. Intraoperatively, the mean EBL was 1,105 mL (range, 350-3,000 mL), 29 (17%) of participants sustained durotomies, 14 (8%) experienced neurovascular injury, and the mean duration of surgery was 401 mins (range, 135-695 mins). Postoperatively, 35 (20%) experienced minor complications, 25 (14%) experienced major complications, and mean length of stay was 11 days (range, 2-80 days). Ultrasonic bone curettage use correlated with decreased blood loss (β =-270 mL, P=0.004) and was associated with decreased incidence of durotomy [odds ratio (OR) =0.29, P=0.042].</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Use of spoonless ultrasonic bone curettage in PSO was associated with significantly less blood loss and fewer durotomies compared to traditional drilling in this single surgeon's multi-institutional experience.</p>","PeriodicalId":17131,"journal":{"name":"Journal of spine surgery","volume":"12 8","pages":"134"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13554306/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of spine surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/jss-2026-1-0020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) is a three column deformity correction technique that can achieve 30 to 40 degrees of correction and is best used for patients with severe rigid sagittal imbalances. Patients report a high degree of satisfaction with quality of life outcomes as a consequence of undergoing PSO. However, complications range between 12% and 40%, including dural tears or neurovascular injuries causing neurological deficit occurring as a consequence of high speed drilling or traction from the spooned retractors used to facilitate exposure. Ultrasonic bone curettes may provide a safer alternative to the drill and retractor approach. The purpose of this retrospective study was to compare outcomes between newer spoonless ultrasonic bone curettage and traditional high speed drilling with paravertebral spoon retractors for pedicle subtraction osteotomies.

Methods: All patients undergoing PSO with a single surgeon across two academic health institutions in the past eight years were reviewed. Preoperative variables obtained were demographics, prior spine surgeries, and etiology, while intraoperative predictor variables were ultrasonic bone curettage use and number of fused levels. The principal outcomes were surgical: duration of surgery, estimated blood loss (EBL), incidence of durotomies, and neurovascular injury. Secondary outcomes were postoperative: length of stay, need for revision surgery, minor complications, and major complications. Multiple logistic regression was used to evaluate associations with binary outcomes, while multiple linear regression evaluated correlations with continuous outcomes.

Results: Overall, 175 patients were reviewed. In this sample, 89 (51%) had prior surgeries, and 45 (26%) were treated with the ultrasonic bone curettage. Intraoperatively, the mean EBL was 1,105 mL (range, 350-3,000 mL), 29 (17%) of participants sustained durotomies, 14 (8%) experienced neurovascular injury, and the mean duration of surgery was 401 mins (range, 135-695 mins). Postoperatively, 35 (20%) experienced minor complications, 25 (14%) experienced major complications, and mean length of stay was 11 days (range, 2-80 days). Ultrasonic bone curettage use correlated with decreased blood loss (β =-270 mL, P=0.004) and was associated with decreased incidence of durotomy [odds ratio (OR) =0.29, P=0.042].

Conclusions: Use of spoonless ultrasonic bone curettage in PSO was associated with significantly less blood loss and fewer durotomies compared to traditional drilling in this single surgeon's multi-institutional experience.

超声刮骨器椎弓根减截骨术减少硬脑膜切开术,减少出血量:单个外科医生的回顾性经验。
背景:椎弓根减截骨术(PSO)是一种三柱畸形矫正技术,可实现30 ~ 40度矫正,最适用于严重刚性矢状面不平衡的患者。作为接受PSO的结果,患者报告了对生活质量结果的高度满意度。然而,并发症在12%到40%之间,包括硬脑膜撕裂或神经血管损伤,导致神经功能缺损,这是由于高速钻孔或牵引用于暴露的勺状牵开器造成的。超声骨镊可以提供一个更安全的替代钻和牵开方法。本回顾性研究的目的是比较新型无勺超声刮骨术与传统高速钻孔椎旁勺式牵开器椎弓根减截骨术的效果。方法:回顾性分析近8年来两家学术医疗机构同一位外科医生行PSO手术的所有患者。术前变量为人口统计学、既往脊柱手术和病因学,术中预测变量为超声刮骨术的使用和融合节段的数量。主要结果是手术:手术时间、估计失血量(EBL)、硬膜切开术发生率和神经血管损伤。次要结局是术后:住院时间,需要翻修手术,轻微并发症和主要并发症。多元逻辑回归用于评估与二元结果的相关性,而多元线性回归用于评估与连续结果的相关性。结果:共纳入175例患者。本组89例(51%)患者既往有手术史,45例(26%)患者行超声刮骨术。术中平均EBL为1105 mL(范围350- 3000 mL), 29例(17%)患者接受硬膜切开术,14例(8%)患者出现神经血管损伤,平均手术时间为401分钟(范围135-695分钟)。术后轻度并发症35例(20%),重度并发症25例(14%),平均住院时间11天(范围2 ~ 80天)。超声刮骨术与出血量减少相关(β =-270 mL, P=0.004),与硬膜切开发生率降低相关[比值比(OR) =0.29, P=0.042]。结论:与传统钻孔相比,在PSO中使用无勺超声刮骨术可以显著减少出血量和硬膜切开术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of spine surgery
Journal of spine surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书