Anatomical level-dependent variation in ultrasonographic skin-to-epiglottis depth and its diagnostic performance for difficult laryngoscopy: A prospective observational study.

IF 2.2 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Indian Journal of Anaesthesia Pub Date : 2026-08-01 Epub Date: 2026-08-20 DOI:10.4103/ija.ija_406_26
Çağdaş Savran, Özge Köner, Sibel Temür, Hatice Türe
{"title":"Anatomical level-dependent variation in ultrasonographic skin-to-epiglottis depth and its diagnostic performance for difficult laryngoscopy: A prospective observational study.","authors":"Çağdaş Savran, Özge Köner, Sibel Temür, Hatice Türe","doi":"10.4103/ija.ija_406_26","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Ultrasonographic skin-to-epiglottis depth (SED) has been proposed as a predictor of difficult laryngoscopy (DL). Most studies have evaluated transverse measurements at a single anatomical level, and the influence of parasagittal imaging and measurement level on diagnostic performance remains unclear. This study aimed to assess anatomical level-dependent variation in parasagittal SED and to compare its diagnostic accuracy for predicting DL.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective observational study, 150 adult patients undergoing elective surgery under general anaesthesia were evaluated preoperatively. Parasagittal SED was measured at three anatomical landmarks: the upper hyoid border (HUB), lower hyoid border (HLB), and thyrohyoid membrane (THM). Difficult laryngoscopy was defined as Cormack-Lehane grade III-IV. Diagnostic performance was analysed using receiver operating characteristic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>DL occurred in 32 patients (21.3%). Parasagittal SED differed significantly across anatomical levels. HUB measurements demonstrated superior predictive performance [area under the curve (AUC) 0.86; 95% confidence interval 0.79-0.92] compared with HLB (AUC 0.75) and THM (AUC 0.65). The HUB/THM ratio showed similarly high discrimination (AUC 0.86). Conventional airway tests showed modest predictive values (AUC 0.62-0.72). Multivariable analysis identified HUB SED >24 mm, inter-incisor distance ≤4 cm, and upper lip bite test class II-III as independent predictors of DL.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Parasagittal SED demonstrates anatomical level-dependent variability that affects diagnostic performance. Assessment at the upper hyoid border provides the highest discrimination and may improve ultrasound-based airway risk stratification.</p>","PeriodicalId":13339,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Anaesthesia","volume":"70 8","pages":"935-942"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13557738/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ija.ija_406_26","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: Ultrasonographic skin-to-epiglottis depth (SED) has been proposed as a predictor of difficult laryngoscopy (DL). Most studies have evaluated transverse measurements at a single anatomical level, and the influence of parasagittal imaging and measurement level on diagnostic performance remains unclear. This study aimed to assess anatomical level-dependent variation in parasagittal SED and to compare its diagnostic accuracy for predicting DL.

Methods: In this prospective observational study, 150 adult patients undergoing elective surgery under general anaesthesia were evaluated preoperatively. Parasagittal SED was measured at three anatomical landmarks: the upper hyoid border (HUB), lower hyoid border (HLB), and thyrohyoid membrane (THM). Difficult laryngoscopy was defined as Cormack-Lehane grade III-IV. Diagnostic performance was analysed using receiver operating characteristic analysis.

Results: DL occurred in 32 patients (21.3%). Parasagittal SED differed significantly across anatomical levels. HUB measurements demonstrated superior predictive performance [area under the curve (AUC) 0.86; 95% confidence interval 0.79-0.92] compared with HLB (AUC 0.75) and THM (AUC 0.65). The HUB/THM ratio showed similarly high discrimination (AUC 0.86). Conventional airway tests showed modest predictive values (AUC 0.62-0.72). Multivariable analysis identified HUB SED >24 mm, inter-incisor distance ≤4 cm, and upper lip bite test class II-III as independent predictors of DL.

Conclusion: Parasagittal SED demonstrates anatomical level-dependent variability that affects diagnostic performance. Assessment at the upper hyoid border provides the highest discrimination and may improve ultrasound-based airway risk stratification.

超声皮肤到会厌深度的解剖水平依赖性变化及其对困难喉镜的诊断性能:一项前瞻性观察研究。
背景和目的:超声皮肤到会厌深度(SED)已被提出作为喉镜检查困难(DL)的预测指标。大多数研究都是在单一解剖水平上评估横向测量,副矢状面成像和测量水平对诊断性能的影响尚不清楚。本研究旨在评估副矢状面SED的解剖水平依赖性变异,并比较其预测深度痴呆的诊断准确性。方法:在这项前瞻性观察研究中,对150例在全身麻醉下接受择期手术的成年患者进行术前评估。在舌骨上缘(HUB)、舌骨下缘(HLB)和甲状腺舌骨膜(THM)三个解剖标志处测量副矢状面SED。咽喉镜检查困难定义为Cormack-Lehane III-IV级。采用接收机工作特性分析分析诊断性能。结果:DL 32例(21.3%)。旁矢状面SED在不同解剖水平上差异显著。HUB测量显示出优越的预测性能[曲线下面积(AUC) 0.86;95%置信区间为0.79-0.92],与HLB (AUC 0.75)和THM (AUC 0.65)相比。HUB/THM比值也表现出同样高的判别性(AUC 0.86)。常规气道试验显示适度的预测值(AUC 0.62-0.72)。多变量分析发现HUB SED >24 mm、切牙间距离≤4 cm、上唇咬合测试等级II-III是DL的独立预测因子。结论:旁矢状面SED显示了影响诊断性能的解剖水平依赖性变异性。舌骨上边界的评估提供了最高的区分,并可能改善基于超声的气道风险分层。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
44.80%
发文量
210
审稿时长
36 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书