Functional assessments used in routine care for duchenne muscular dystrophy in the United States: A survey of certified duchenne care centers.

IF 3.5 4区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Ruthwik Duvuru, Eric Camino, Rachel Schrader, Megan Freed, James Signorovitch, Jia Zhong, Shimin Bi, Susan J Ward, Aravindhan Veerapandiyan
{"title":"Functional assessments used in routine care for duchenne muscular dystrophy in the United States: A survey of certified duchenne care centers.","authors":"Ruthwik Duvuru, Eric Camino, Rachel Schrader, Megan Freed, James Signorovitch, Jia Zhong, Shimin Bi, Susan J Ward, Aravindhan Veerapandiyan","doi":"10.1177/22143602261488510","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundClinical decision-making, disease progression monitoring, and evaluation of novel therapies for patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) rely on functional assessments. This study aimed to evaluate the use of functional assessments in routine DMD care and identify challenges encountered in their administration and documentation.MethodsA cross-sectional online survey was conducted in 2023 among 36 Certified Duchenne Care Centers (CDCCs) in the United States. Center directors collaborated with multidisciplinary teams to provide single response per center. The survey encompassed functional assessments for ambulatory and non-ambulatory patients, milestones definitions, documentation practices, and perceived barriers.ResultsTwenty-three CDCCs responded to the survey. Nearly half of the centers cared for up to 200 patients with DMD in the previous year, and all used electronic health record systems. Functional assessments were routinely conducted for both ambulatory and non-ambulatory patients, though variability was observed in assessment implementation, standardization procedures, training practices, documentation, and milestone definitions. Consistent use of assessments was reported in ambulatory patients; however, the extent of formal training and use of documented standard operating procedures varied across centers. Definitions of loss of ambulation were heterogeneous and often depended on the assessor's judgment. The most frequently reported barriers to conducting and documenting functional assessments included limited clinic time, insufficient staff hours, patient and caregiver burden, lack of convenient data-entry tools, and the time required for documentation.ConclusionsThe study provides an overview of functional assessment practices at CDCCs and identifies important opportunities to harmonize assessment implementation, documentation, and milestone definitions across centers.</p>","PeriodicalId":16536,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neuromuscular diseases","volume":" ","pages":"22143602261488510"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13558472/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neuromuscular diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/22143602261488510","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundClinical decision-making, disease progression monitoring, and evaluation of novel therapies for patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) rely on functional assessments. This study aimed to evaluate the use of functional assessments in routine DMD care and identify challenges encountered in their administration and documentation.MethodsA cross-sectional online survey was conducted in 2023 among 36 Certified Duchenne Care Centers (CDCCs) in the United States. Center directors collaborated with multidisciplinary teams to provide single response per center. The survey encompassed functional assessments for ambulatory and non-ambulatory patients, milestones definitions, documentation practices, and perceived barriers.ResultsTwenty-three CDCCs responded to the survey. Nearly half of the centers cared for up to 200 patients with DMD in the previous year, and all used electronic health record systems. Functional assessments were routinely conducted for both ambulatory and non-ambulatory patients, though variability was observed in assessment implementation, standardization procedures, training practices, documentation, and milestone definitions. Consistent use of assessments was reported in ambulatory patients; however, the extent of formal training and use of documented standard operating procedures varied across centers. Definitions of loss of ambulation were heterogeneous and often depended on the assessor's judgment. The most frequently reported barriers to conducting and documenting functional assessments included limited clinic time, insufficient staff hours, patient and caregiver burden, lack of convenient data-entry tools, and the time required for documentation.ConclusionsThe study provides an overview of functional assessment practices at CDCCs and identifies important opportunities to harmonize assessment implementation, documentation, and milestone definitions across centers.

在美国杜氏肌营养不良症的常规护理中使用的功能评估:一项对经认证的杜氏护理中心的调查。
杜氏肌营养不良(DMD)患者的临床决策、疾病进展监测和新疗法评估依赖于功能评估。本研究旨在评估功能评估在常规DMD护理中的应用,并确定其管理和记录中遇到的挑战。方法于2023年对美国36家经认证的杜氏护理中心(CDCCs)进行横断面在线调查。中心主任与多学科团队合作,为每个中心提供单一响应。该调查包括对门诊和非门诊患者的功能评估、里程碑定义、记录实践和感知障碍。结果23家疾控中心回应了调查。在过去的一年里,将近一半的中心照顾了多达200名DMD患者,并且都使用了电子健康记录系统。尽管在评估实施、标准化程序、培训实践、文件和里程碑定义方面存在差异,但对门诊和非门诊患者的功能评估都是常规进行的。据报道,在门诊患者中一致使用评估;然而,各个中心的正规培训和标准操作程序的使用程度各不相同。行动能力丧失的定义是不同的,往往取决于评估者的判断。进行和记录功能评估的最常见障碍包括门诊时间有限、工作人员工作时间不足、患者和护理人员负担、缺乏方便的数据输入工具以及记录所需的时间。本研究概述了疾控中心的功能评估实践,并确定了跨中心协调评估实施、文档和里程碑定义的重要机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of neuromuscular diseases
Journal of neuromuscular diseases Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
6.10%
发文量
102
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neuromuscular Diseases aims to facilitate progress in understanding the molecular genetics/correlates, pathogenesis, pharmacology, diagnosis and treatment of acquired and genetic neuromuscular diseases (including muscular dystrophy, myasthenia gravis, spinal muscular atrophy, neuropathies, myopathies, myotonias and myositis). The journal publishes research reports, reviews, short communications, letters-to-the-editor, and will consider research that has negative findings. The journal is dedicated to providing an open forum for original research in basic science, translational and clinical research that will improve our fundamental understanding and lead to effective treatments of neuromuscular diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书