Efficacy and safety of memantine in adults with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 4
Lara Hamzeh Hamzeh, Enas Seyed, Mena Ayman Elgendy, Daher Heib, Beshoy I Sadek, Chalak O S Mohammed, Karima El Refaei, Yara F Soliman, Nora Eldmrdash, Mahmoud Shaaban Abdelgalil, Mahmoud M Elsayed
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of memantine in adults with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Lara Hamzeh Hamzeh, Enas Seyed, Mena Ayman Elgendy, Daher Heib, Beshoy I Sadek, Chalak O S Mohammed, Karima El Refaei, Yara F Soliman, Nora Eldmrdash, Mahmoud Shaaban Abdelgalil, Mahmoud M Elsayed","doi":"10.1007/s00702-026-03281-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a progressive neurodegenerative disease with limited disease-modifying treatment options. Memantine, an N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist, has been investigated in ALS, but its safety remains unclear. This study systematically assessed the safety of memantine in adults with ALS. A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, searching PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Web of Science for randomized controlled trials of memantine in adults with ALS. Outcomes included ALSFRS-R and FVC decline, adverse neurological events, total and serious adverse events, treatment discontinuation, and all-cause mortality. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool. Because of heterogeneous reporting and missing variance estimates, ALSFRS-R and FVC outcomes were synthesized narratively; only safety outcomes were pooled quantitatively. Three randomized controlled trials (706 participants) met the inclusion criteria. Functional and respiratory outcomes could not be pooled because of heterogeneous reporting, and no consistent benefit was observed. Memantine showed lower headache incidence than placebo (RR 0.43; 95% CI 0.19-0.96), with no significant differences in constipation, falls, dizziness, treatment discontinuation, or all-cause mortality. Memantine showed a borderline increase in serious adverse events (RR 1.52; 95% CI 1.00-2.31) and a higher risk of total adverse events (RR 1.19; 95% CI 1.09-1.30). Memantine was associated with a small but significant increase in total adverse events and a trend toward more serious adverse events, without improving functional decline, respiratory function, or survival in ALS. Current evidence does not support its use as a disease-modifying or adjunctive therapy. Trial registration: PROSPERO CRD420261277874.</p>","PeriodicalId":520679,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00702-026-03281-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a progressive neurodegenerative disease with limited disease-modifying treatment options. Memantine, an N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist, has been investigated in ALS, but its safety remains unclear. This study systematically assessed the safety of memantine in adults with ALS. A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, searching PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Web of Science for randomized controlled trials of memantine in adults with ALS. Outcomes included ALSFRS-R and FVC decline, adverse neurological events, total and serious adverse events, treatment discontinuation, and all-cause mortality. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool. Because of heterogeneous reporting and missing variance estimates, ALSFRS-R and FVC outcomes were synthesized narratively; only safety outcomes were pooled quantitatively. Three randomized controlled trials (706 participants) met the inclusion criteria. Functional and respiratory outcomes could not be pooled because of heterogeneous reporting, and no consistent benefit was observed. Memantine showed lower headache incidence than placebo (RR 0.43; 95% CI 0.19-0.96), with no significant differences in constipation, falls, dizziness, treatment discontinuation, or all-cause mortality. Memantine showed a borderline increase in serious adverse events (RR 1.52; 95% CI 1.00-2.31) and a higher risk of total adverse events (RR 1.19; 95% CI 1.09-1.30). Memantine was associated with a small but significant increase in total adverse events and a trend toward more serious adverse events, without improving functional decline, respiratory function, or survival in ALS. Current evidence does not support its use as a disease-modifying or adjunctive therapy. Trial registration: PROSPERO CRD420261277874.

美金刚治疗肌萎缩性侧索硬化症的有效性和安全性:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。
肌萎缩性侧索硬化症(ALS)是一种进行性神经退行性疾病,治疗方法有限。美金刚是一种n -甲基- d -天冬氨酸受体拮抗剂,已被研究用于ALS,但其安全性尚不清楚。本研究系统地评估了美金刚在成人ALS患者中的安全性。根据PRISMA 2020指南,检索PubMed、Cochrane Library、Scopus和Web of Science,进行了一项系统综述和荟萃分析,以获得美金刚在成人ALS患者中的随机对照试验。结果包括ALSFRS-R和FVC下降、不良神经事件、总不良事件和严重不良事件、停药和全因死亡率。使用Cochrane Risk of bias 2工具评估偏倚风险。由于异质性报告和缺失方差估计,ALSFRS-R和FVC结果是叙述性地综合的;只有安全性结果被定量汇总。三个随机对照试验(706名受试者)符合纳入标准。由于报告不一致,不能汇总功能和呼吸结果,并且没有观察到一致的益处。美金刚的头痛发生率低于安慰剂(RR 0.43; 95% CI 0.19-0.96),在便秘、跌倒、头晕、停药或全因死亡率方面无显著差异。美金刚组严重不良事件发生率增加(RR 1.52; 95% CI 1.00-2.31),总不良事件发生率增加(RR 1.19; 95% CI 1.09-1.30)。美金刚与总不良事件的小幅但显著的增加和更严重不良事件的趋势相关,没有改善ALS患者的功能衰退、呼吸功能或生存。目前的证据不支持将其用作疾病改善或辅助治疗。试验注册:PROSPERO CRD420261277874。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书