José Higinio de Gea García, Diego Lorenzo Adánez, Antonia Del Amor Cantero Sandoval, Roxana Soledad Rojas Luán, M Gracia Adánez Martínez
{"title":"Gender perspective in cardiopulmonary resuscitation training: Evaluation of an educational intervention using a simulator with female anatomy.","authors":"José Higinio de Gea García, Diego Lorenzo Adánez, Antonia Del Amor Cantero Sandoval, Roxana Soledad Rojas Luán, M Gracia Adánez Martínez","doi":"10.1016/j.medine.2026.502554","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate knowledge, skills and attitudes regarding cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) according to patient sex, and to analyze whether a gender-perspective training intervention can influence these aspects.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Quasi-experimental study with random allocation and pre-post evaluation.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Faculty of Medicine (University of Murcia).</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>96 students; 42% men and 58% women.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Participants completed a baseline survey and performed a simulation using a mannequin with female anatomy. Subsequently, they were randomized to an experimental or control group. The experimental group received a CPR training workshop with a gender perspective and repeated both the survey and the simulation, while the control group completed both evaluations without training.</p><p><strong>Main variables of interest: </strong>Theoretical knowledge, perception of safety, performance of technical skills, and attitude toward CPR in women.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At baseline, no differences were observed between the two groups. After the intervention, the experimental group showed higher perception of safety, with significant improvements in chest exposure (5 [1-8] vs 2 [1-4], P < .001), reduction of fear of misinterpretations (7 [3-8] vs 3 [1-6], P < .001), and perception that breasts may affect CPR (6 [5-8] vs 3 [1-5], P < .001). In addition, better CPR performance and appropriate placement of defibrillator pads (31.6% vs 84.2%, P < .001) in relation to breast anatomy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Training with a gender perspective is associated with improved knowledge, skills, and attitudes toward the resuscitation of women and may contribute to reducing training barriers and increasing confidence of future professionals.</p>","PeriodicalId":94139,"journal":{"name":"Medicina intensiva","volume":" ","pages":"502554"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicina intensiva","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medine.2026.502554","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate knowledge, skills and attitudes regarding cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) according to patient sex, and to analyze whether a gender-perspective training intervention can influence these aspects.
Design: Quasi-experimental study with random allocation and pre-post evaluation.
Setting: Faculty of Medicine (University of Murcia).
Participants: 96 students; 42% men and 58% women.
Interventions: Participants completed a baseline survey and performed a simulation using a mannequin with female anatomy. Subsequently, they were randomized to an experimental or control group. The experimental group received a CPR training workshop with a gender perspective and repeated both the survey and the simulation, while the control group completed both evaluations without training.
Main variables of interest: Theoretical knowledge, perception of safety, performance of technical skills, and attitude toward CPR in women.
Results: At baseline, no differences were observed between the two groups. After the intervention, the experimental group showed higher perception of safety, with significant improvements in chest exposure (5 [1-8] vs 2 [1-4], P < .001), reduction of fear of misinterpretations (7 [3-8] vs 3 [1-6], P < .001), and perception that breasts may affect CPR (6 [5-8] vs 3 [1-5], P < .001). In addition, better CPR performance and appropriate placement of defibrillator pads (31.6% vs 84.2%, P < .001) in relation to breast anatomy.
Conclusions: Training with a gender perspective is associated with improved knowledge, skills, and attitudes toward the resuscitation of women and may contribute to reducing training barriers and increasing confidence of future professionals.