{"title":"Central nervous system symptom burden and clinical implications for antiemetic management with olanzapine in AC chemotherapy.","authors":"Ryoko Udagawa, Mototsugu Shimokawa, Hirotoshi Iihara, Rie Ozeki, Michiko Tsuneizumi, Manabu Futamura, Tomoyuki Fujita, Hideaki Ogata, Hiroko Bando, Toshitaka Uomori, Hironobu Hashimoto, Ryosuke Hayami, Yoshihisa Tokumaru, Goro Kutomi, Kan Yonemori, Ryoichi Matsunuma, Mika Kitahora, Naotake Yanagisawa, Tatsunori Shimoi, Mitsue Saito","doi":"10.1093/oncolo/oyag351","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Olanzapine 5 mg improves chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) control in patients receiving anthracycline-cyclophosphamide (AC) chemotherapy, but sedation remains a concern. We evaluated whether central nervous system (CNS) symptom burden identifies patients at higher risk of poor CINV control.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This secondary analysis of the phase III JTOP-B trial included women with breast cancer receiving AC chemotherapy. Patients were randomized to olanzapine 5 mg or placebo plus standard triplet antiemetic therapy. Daily patient-reported sedation and concentration impairment were assessed for 5 days. CNS burden was evaluated using recurrent \"Bad Days\" (concurrent moderate/severe sedation and concentration impairment) and cumulative CNS burden scores. Associations between CNS symptom patterns and complete response (CR; no emesis and no rescue medication) during 0-120 hours were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 480 patients, CR rates decreased with increasing CNS symptom severity in both groups. In the olanzapine group, CR rates decreased across increasing sedation (75.0%-51.6%) and concentration impairment (78.1%-48.6%). Concentration impairment more strongly identified patients with poor CINV control than sedation alone. Higher cumulative CNS burden and recurrent Bad Days were associated with lower CR rates, identifying a clinically vulnerable population. Olanzapine maintained higher CR rates than placebo across CNS symptom strata.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CNS symptom burden was associated with suboptimal CINV control, while 5 mg of olanzapine maintained superior antiemetic efficacy across CNS symptom strata. Monitoring day-to-day CNS symptoms may help identify patients requiring closer observation or additional supportive care.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Japan Registry of Clinical Trials Identifier: jRCT1031200134.</p>","PeriodicalId":54686,"journal":{"name":"Oncologist","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13599778/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncologist","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oncolo/oyag351","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Olanzapine 5 mg improves chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) control in patients receiving anthracycline-cyclophosphamide (AC) chemotherapy, but sedation remains a concern. We evaluated whether central nervous system (CNS) symptom burden identifies patients at higher risk of poor CINV control.
Patients and methods: This secondary analysis of the phase III JTOP-B trial included women with breast cancer receiving AC chemotherapy. Patients were randomized to olanzapine 5 mg or placebo plus standard triplet antiemetic therapy. Daily patient-reported sedation and concentration impairment were assessed for 5 days. CNS burden was evaluated using recurrent "Bad Days" (concurrent moderate/severe sedation and concentration impairment) and cumulative CNS burden scores. Associations between CNS symptom patterns and complete response (CR; no emesis and no rescue medication) during 0-120 hours were analyzed.
Results: Among 480 patients, CR rates decreased with increasing CNS symptom severity in both groups. In the olanzapine group, CR rates decreased across increasing sedation (75.0%-51.6%) and concentration impairment (78.1%-48.6%). Concentration impairment more strongly identified patients with poor CINV control than sedation alone. Higher cumulative CNS burden and recurrent Bad Days were associated with lower CR rates, identifying a clinically vulnerable population. Olanzapine maintained higher CR rates than placebo across CNS symptom strata.
Conclusions: CNS symptom burden was associated with suboptimal CINV control, while 5 mg of olanzapine maintained superior antiemetic efficacy across CNS symptom strata. Monitoring day-to-day CNS symptoms may help identify patients requiring closer observation or additional supportive care.
Trial registration: Japan Registry of Clinical Trials Identifier: jRCT1031200134.
期刊介绍:
The Oncologist® is dedicated to translating the latest research developments into the best multidimensional care for cancer patients. Thus, The Oncologist is committed to helping physicians excel in this ever-expanding environment through the publication of timely reviews, original studies, and commentaries on important developments. We believe that the practice of oncology requires both an understanding of a range of disciplines encompassing basic science related to cancer, translational research, and clinical practice, but also the socioeconomic and psychosocial factors that determine access to care and quality of life and function following cancer treatment.