Complications leading to device explant in patients with chronic non-cancer pain receiving intrathecal drug delivery.

IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Salim Michel Hayek, Sameam Shahrestani, Jacob Blank, Beatriz Feijo, Jose Reyes, Phu Duong, Muskan Sidhu, Qiuchen Li, Ryan Shaner, Jennifer Murphy, Michael D Staudt
{"title":"Complications leading to device explant in patients with chronic non-cancer pain receiving intrathecal drug delivery.","authors":"Salim Michel Hayek, Sameam Shahrestani, Jacob Blank, Beatriz Feijo, Jose Reyes, Phu Duong, Muskan Sidhu, Qiuchen Li, Ryan Shaner, Jennifer Murphy, Michael D Staudt","doi":"10.1136/rapm-2025-107223","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Intrathecal drug delivery (IDD) is often used in the management of refractory chronic non-cancer pain, particularly persistent chronic low back pain in the setting of previous lumbar spine surgery (persistent spinal pain syndrome type 2 (PSPS2)). Complications of IDD leading to device explant in patients with chronic non-cancer pain have not been well characterized. This study evaluated complications leading to device explants in a large cohort of patients with chronic non-cancer pain treated with IDD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study was undertaken on patients with chronic non-cancer pain who underwent device implants by Pain Medicine physicians between June 2009 and December 2022 at a large tertiary center academic practice. Data collection included demographic and comorbidity data as well as the various indications for device explant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data were collected from 215 patients with chronic non-cancer pain who underwent device implant and were followed for a mean duration of 80±48.8 months. The average age at the time of implant was 63.24±12.05 years, and the majority (184 patients) suffered from PSPS2. The explant rate was 26.1%, and device-related infection was the leading cause of explants occurring in 9.3% of patients and 5.9% of device surgeries. Loss of analgesic efficacy leading to device explant occurred in 5.6% of patients, but this was significantly less than the explant rate due to habituation noted with spinal cord stimulation (SCS) in a similar patient population. compared with other complications leading to device explants, infections had a much earlier time interval from device implant to explant. No demographic or comorbidity factors correlated with device explants.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Device-related infections are the leading cause for explants in IDD for chronic non-cancer pain. Explants due to loss of analgesic efficacy occurred at a lesser frequency with IDD compared with SCS explants in a similar patient population.</p>","PeriodicalId":54503,"journal":{"name":"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","volume":"51 9","pages":"1048-1054"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2025-107223","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Intrathecal drug delivery (IDD) is often used in the management of refractory chronic non-cancer pain, particularly persistent chronic low back pain in the setting of previous lumbar spine surgery (persistent spinal pain syndrome type 2 (PSPS2)). Complications of IDD leading to device explant in patients with chronic non-cancer pain have not been well characterized. This study evaluated complications leading to device explants in a large cohort of patients with chronic non-cancer pain treated with IDD.

Methods: A retrospective study was undertaken on patients with chronic non-cancer pain who underwent device implants by Pain Medicine physicians between June 2009 and December 2022 at a large tertiary center academic practice. Data collection included demographic and comorbidity data as well as the various indications for device explant.

Results: Data were collected from 215 patients with chronic non-cancer pain who underwent device implant and were followed for a mean duration of 80±48.8 months. The average age at the time of implant was 63.24±12.05 years, and the majority (184 patients) suffered from PSPS2. The explant rate was 26.1%, and device-related infection was the leading cause of explants occurring in 9.3% of patients and 5.9% of device surgeries. Loss of analgesic efficacy leading to device explant occurred in 5.6% of patients, but this was significantly less than the explant rate due to habituation noted with spinal cord stimulation (SCS) in a similar patient population. compared with other complications leading to device explants, infections had a much earlier time interval from device implant to explant. No demographic or comorbidity factors correlated with device explants.

Conclusion: Device-related infections are the leading cause for explants in IDD for chronic non-cancer pain. Explants due to loss of analgesic efficacy occurred at a lesser frequency with IDD compared with SCS explants in a similar patient population.

慢性非癌性疼痛患者接受鞘内给药导致器械外植体的并发症。
鞘内给药(IDD)常用于治疗难治性慢性非癌性疼痛,特别是既往腰椎手术后的持续性慢性下腰痛(2型持续性脊柱疼痛综合征(PSPS2))。慢性非癌性疼痛患者IDD导致器械外植体的并发症尚未得到很好的描述。本研究评估了大量IDD治疗的慢性非癌性疼痛患者植入装置的并发症。方法:回顾性研究2009年6月至2022年12月在一家大型三级中心学术实践机构接受疼痛医学医生植入器械治疗的慢性非癌性疼痛患者。数据收集包括人口统计和合并症数据以及器械外植体的各种适应症。结果:收集了215例慢性非癌性疼痛患者的数据,这些患者接受了器械植入,平均随访时间为80±48.8个月。种植时的平均年龄为63.24±12.05岁,多数(184例)患者患有PSPS2。外植体率为26.1%,器械相关感染是导致外植体的主要原因,占9.3%的患者和5.9%的器械手术。在5.6%的患者中,由于镇痛效果丧失导致装置外植,但这明显低于在类似患者群体中由于脊髓刺激(SCS)引起的习惯化导致的外植率。与其他并发症相比,感染从植入装置到移植的时间间隔要早得多。没有人口统计学或合并症因素与器械外植体相关。结论:器械相关感染是IDD引起慢性非癌性疼痛的主要原因。在相似的患者群体中,与SCS移植相比,IDD患者因镇痛效果丧失而移植的频率较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
11.80%
发文量
175
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine, the official publication of the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine (ASRA), is a monthly journal that publishes peer-reviewed scientific and clinical studies to advance the understanding and clinical application of regional techniques for surgical anesthesia and postoperative analgesia. Coverage includes intraoperative regional techniques, perioperative pain, chronic pain, obstetric anesthesia, pediatric anesthesia, outcome studies, and complications. Published for over thirty years, this respected journal also serves as the official publication of the European Society of Regional Anaesthesia and Pain Therapy (ESRA), the Asian and Oceanic Society of Regional Anesthesia (AOSRA), the Latin American Society of Regional Anesthesia (LASRA), the African Society for Regional Anesthesia (AFSRA), and the Academy of Regional Anaesthesia of India (AORA).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书