Infant Feeding Apps and Digital Parenting in Australia: Qualitative Study.

IF 2.3 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Diana Arabiat, Harrison See, Lisa Whitehead
{"title":"Infant Feeding Apps and Digital Parenting in Australia: Qualitative Study.","authors":"Diana Arabiat, Harrison See, Lisa Whitehead","doi":"10.2196/95934","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Parents are increasingly using infant feeding apps (IFAs) for information and decision-making related to breastfeeding and other aspects of their baby's care. Few studies have explored how users conceptualize data privacy risks in relation to IFAs and how concerns are balanced with app use.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This qualitative study forms part of the Infant Feeding App project exploring how IFAs influence parent-child communication in Australian families. A focus of this investigation was to explore mothers' understanding of the terms and conditions associated with the use of IFAs and their data privacy concerns.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included first-time parents of children aged 0 to 4 years who were breastfeeding at the time of the first interview and previously or currently used 1 or more IFAs. Twenty-four participants completed the first-round interview; of those, 22 returned for a second-round interview approximately 6 months later, and 7 participated in the focus group discussion. Reflexive thematic analysis was used to analyze the data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This paper draws primarily on findings from the key category of \"Data and/or Privacy Practices.\" This category was further refined into 2 main themes: lack of awareness or acceptance of the terms and conditions associated with the mobile app and the risk mitigation behaviors mothers took to protect their privacy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although mothers were aware of the privacy risks associated with IFAs, they nonetheless continued to engage with them, reflecting the broader growth in digital technology use. This paper has highlighted that privacy, a fundamental human right, is at risk when mothers share personal and child-related data through digital apps. Importantly, mothers' willingness to use these applications despite perceived concerns highlights the tension between perceived utility and potential risks. A call for a move toward privacy by design, transparency in privacy policies, and an approach of nonalienation in the use of data is called for.</p>","PeriodicalId":36223,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting","volume":"9 ","pages":"e95934"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13552647/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/95934","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Parents are increasingly using infant feeding apps (IFAs) for information and decision-making related to breastfeeding and other aspects of their baby's care. Few studies have explored how users conceptualize data privacy risks in relation to IFAs and how concerns are balanced with app use.

Objective: This qualitative study forms part of the Infant Feeding App project exploring how IFAs influence parent-child communication in Australian families. A focus of this investigation was to explore mothers' understanding of the terms and conditions associated with the use of IFAs and their data privacy concerns.

Methods: We included first-time parents of children aged 0 to 4 years who were breastfeeding at the time of the first interview and previously or currently used 1 or more IFAs. Twenty-four participants completed the first-round interview; of those, 22 returned for a second-round interview approximately 6 months later, and 7 participated in the focus group discussion. Reflexive thematic analysis was used to analyze the data.

Results: This paper draws primarily on findings from the key category of "Data and/or Privacy Practices." This category was further refined into 2 main themes: lack of awareness or acceptance of the terms and conditions associated with the mobile app and the risk mitigation behaviors mothers took to protect their privacy.

Conclusions: Although mothers were aware of the privacy risks associated with IFAs, they nonetheless continued to engage with them, reflecting the broader growth in digital technology use. This paper has highlighted that privacy, a fundamental human right, is at risk when mothers share personal and child-related data through digital apps. Importantly, mothers' willingness to use these applications despite perceived concerns highlights the tension between perceived utility and potential risks. A call for a move toward privacy by design, transparency in privacy policies, and an approach of nonalienation in the use of data is called for.

澳大利亚的婴儿喂养应用程序和数字育儿:定性研究。
背景:父母越来越多地使用婴儿喂养应用程序(IFAs)来获取与母乳喂养和婴儿护理其他方面相关的信息和决策。很少有研究探讨用户如何概念化与ifa相关的数据隐私风险,以及如何在应用程序使用中平衡担忧。目的:本定性研究是婴儿喂养App项目的一部分,旨在探索IFAs如何影响澳大利亚家庭的亲子沟通。本调查的一个重点是探讨母亲对IFAs使用相关条款和条件的理解以及她们对数据隐私的担忧。方法:我们纳入了0至4岁儿童的首次父母,他们在第一次访谈时正在母乳喂养,以前或目前使用过1个或更多的IFAs。24名参与者完成了第一轮面试;其中22人在大约6个月后返回进行第二轮面试,7人参加了焦点小组讨论。采用自反性主题分析对数据进行分析。结果:本文主要借鉴了“数据和/或隐私实践”这一关键类别的研究结果。这一类别进一步细化为两个主要主题:缺乏对移动应用程序相关条款和条件的认识或接受,以及母亲为保护自己的隐私而采取的风险缓解行为。结论:尽管母亲们意识到与IFAs相关的隐私风险,但她们仍然继续使用IFAs,这反映了数字技术使用的广泛增长。本文强调,当母亲通过数字应用程序分享个人和儿童相关数据时,隐私权这一基本人权面临风险。重要的是,母亲们愿意使用这些应用程序,尽管他们感到担忧,这凸显了感知效用和潜在风险之间的紧张关系。我们呼吁通过设计来保护隐私,提高隐私政策的透明度,并在使用数据时采取非异化的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting
JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
5.40%
发文量
62
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书