Early changes in dyspnea with 24-h istaroxime infusion among patients with acute heart failure.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine Pub Date : 2026-08-01 Epub Date: 2026-07-31 DOI:10.2459/JCM.0000000000001924
Matteo Pagnesi, Gad Cotter, Beth Davison, Valentina Carubelli, Yuhui Zhang, Gabriella Malfatto, Maria Teresa La Rovere, Carlo Mario Lombardi, Jian Zhang, Marco Metra
{"title":"Early changes in dyspnea with 24-h istaroxime infusion among patients with acute heart failure.","authors":"Matteo Pagnesi, Gad Cotter, Beth Davison, Valentina Carubelli, Yuhui Zhang, Gabriella Malfatto, Maria Teresa La Rovere, Carlo Mario Lombardi, Jian Zhang, Marco Metra","doi":"10.2459/JCM.0000000000001924","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We evaluated the effects of a 24-h istaroxime infusion on changes in self-reported dyspnea among patients with acute heart failure (AHF).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients hospitalized for AHF with ejection fraction ≤40 were randomized to receive a 24-h infusion of placebo or istaroxime at doses of 0.5 (Ista-0.5) or 1.0 μg/kg/min (Ista-1.0). Self-reported dyspnea was assessed by means of a visual analogue scale (VAS). Dyspnea VAS area under the curve (AUC) and changes in VAS dyspnea from baseline through 24 and 48 h were compared between istaroxime- and placebo-treated patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 113 AHF patients (n = 39 placebo, n = 39 Ista-0.5, n = 35 Ista-1.0), a statistically significant difference in dyspnea VAS AUC from baseline through 24 h was observed in the pooled istaroxime arm vs. the placebo arm [win odds 1.44, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.00 to 2.07; P = 0.048], with similar findings for Ista-0.5 vs. placebo (win odds 1.48, 95% CI 1.01 to 2.18; P = 0.047). Win odds consistently favored istaroxime through 48 h, though significance was not maintained. Results were numerically more pronounced among patients with baseline dyspnea VAS < 80, particularly for Ista-0.5 vs. placebo (win odds 1.71, 95% CI 0.76 to 3.83; P = 0.172). Consistent findings were observed changes in dyspnea VAS through 24 h, with a least square mean difference of 2.6 points (95% CI -1.8 to 7.0) between Ista-1.0 and placebo.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among patients with AHF, 24-h istaroxime infusion was associated with a significantly higher probability of dyspnea improvement compared with placebo through 24 h, with results being numerically more pronounced among patients with worse dyspnea at baseline.</p>","PeriodicalId":15228,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine","volume":"27 8","pages":"629-633"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2459/JCM.0000000000001924","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: We evaluated the effects of a 24-h istaroxime infusion on changes in self-reported dyspnea among patients with acute heart failure (AHF).

Methods: Patients hospitalized for AHF with ejection fraction ≤40 were randomized to receive a 24-h infusion of placebo or istaroxime at doses of 0.5 (Ista-0.5) or 1.0 μg/kg/min (Ista-1.0). Self-reported dyspnea was assessed by means of a visual analogue scale (VAS). Dyspnea VAS area under the curve (AUC) and changes in VAS dyspnea from baseline through 24 and 48 h were compared between istaroxime- and placebo-treated patients.

Results: Among 113 AHF patients (n = 39 placebo, n = 39 Ista-0.5, n = 35 Ista-1.0), a statistically significant difference in dyspnea VAS AUC from baseline through 24 h was observed in the pooled istaroxime arm vs. the placebo arm [win odds 1.44, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.00 to 2.07; P = 0.048], with similar findings for Ista-0.5 vs. placebo (win odds 1.48, 95% CI 1.01 to 2.18; P = 0.047). Win odds consistently favored istaroxime through 48 h, though significance was not maintained. Results were numerically more pronounced among patients with baseline dyspnea VAS < 80, particularly for Ista-0.5 vs. placebo (win odds 1.71, 95% CI 0.76 to 3.83; P = 0.172). Consistent findings were observed changes in dyspnea VAS through 24 h, with a least square mean difference of 2.6 points (95% CI -1.8 to 7.0) between Ista-1.0 and placebo.

Conclusions: Among patients with AHF, 24-h istaroxime infusion was associated with a significantly higher probability of dyspnea improvement compared with placebo through 24 h, with results being numerically more pronounced among patients with worse dyspnea at baseline.

急性心力衰竭患者24小时司他肟输注后呼吸困难的早期变化。
背景:我们评估了24小时司他肟输注对急性心力衰竭(AHF)患者自我报告的呼吸困难的影响。方法:将射血分数≤40的AHF住院患者随机分为两组,分别以0.5 (Ista-0.5)或1.0 μg/kg/min (Ista-1.0)剂量输注安慰剂或司他肟,输注24h。自我报告的呼吸困难通过视觉模拟量表(VAS)进行评估。比较司他肟组和安慰剂组患者的VAS曲线下面积(AUC)和VAS呼吸困难从基线到24和48 h的变化。结果:在113例AHF患者中(n = 39名安慰剂组,n = 39名Ista-0.5组,n = 35名Ista-1.0组),合并司他肟组与安慰剂组的呼吸困难VAS AUC从基线到24 h的差异有统计学意义[优势比1.44,95%可信区间(CI) 1.00至2.07;P = 0.048], Ista-0.5组与安慰剂组的结果相似(获胜几率1.48,95% CI 1.01至2.18;P = 0.047)。在48小时内,获胜几率一直倾向于使用司他肟,尽管没有维持显著性。结论:在AHF患者中,与安慰剂相比,24小时输注司他肟与24小时内呼吸困难改善的可能性显著增加,在基线时呼吸困难更严重的患者中,结果在数字上更为明显。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine
Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
26.70%
发文量
189
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine is a monthly publication of the Italian Federation of Cardiology. It publishes original research articles, epidemiological studies, new methodological clinical approaches, case reports, design and goals of clinical trials, review articles, points of view, editorials and Images in cardiovascular medicine. Submitted articles undergo a preliminary review by the editor. Some articles may be returned to authors without further consideration. Those being considered for publication will undergo further assessment and peer-review by the editors and those invited to do so from a reviewer pool. ​
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书