Differential Air Entrainment of Mini-Basket and Circular Mapping Catheters Through the FARADRIVE Sheath: Mitigation With a Liquid-Sealed Insertion Method

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology Pub Date : 2026-10-13 Epub Date: 2026-09-08 DOI:10.1111/jce.70492
Thai Duy Vo, Ting-Yung Chang, Chin-Yu Lin, Pei-Yi Wang, Kuo-Hsiang Lu, Hsin-Lei Huang
{"title":"Differential Air Entrainment of Mini-Basket and Circular Mapping Catheters Through the FARADRIVE Sheath: Mitigation With a Liquid-Sealed Insertion Method","authors":"Thai Duy Vo,&nbsp;Ting-Yung Chang,&nbsp;Chin-Yu Lin,&nbsp;Pei-Yi Wang,&nbsp;Kuo-Hsiang Lu,&nbsp;Hsin-Lei Huang","doi":"10.1111/jce.70492","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Iatrogenic air entrainment is a preventable embolic hazard in pulsed field ablation (PFA). Mapping catheter insertion through large-bore PFA sheaths may be a vulnerable step, but the roles of catheter geometry and liquid-sealed insertion are unclear.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods and Results</h3>\n \n <p>In an ex vivo saline tank model, ORION mini-basket and SPIRAL circular mapping catheters were inserted through the FARADRIVE steerable sheath using saline infusion only, continuous manual suction, or liquid-sealed insertion with a custom Adapter Sink. The primary endpoint was macroscopic air recovered distally after each trial of 10 insertions; the trial was the unit of analysis, and 0.2 mL was the smallest quantitatively reportable volume. In 60 trials (600 insertions), mitigation strategy significantly affected air entrainment (Kruskal–Wallis <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Under saline infusion alone, ORION generated more air than SPIRAL (23.86 ± 3.63 vs. 7.20 ± 2.09 mL per 10 insertions; 2.39 vs. 0.72 mL per insertion; adjusted <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Manual suction reduced entrainment to 3.96 ± 1.01 and 1.02 ± 0.45 mL per 10 insertions (0.40 and 0.10 mL per insertion), but residual air persisted. With liquid-sealed insertion, no visually detectable or quantitatively measurable macroscopic air was observed in any trial.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Air entrainment varied according to mapping-catheter geometry and mitigation strategy. Timed manual suction substantially reduced, but did not abolish, measurable air. Liquid-sealed insertion was associated with no measurable macroscopic air within this ex vivo model, warranting further evaluation under physiologic pressure conditions and in clinical PFA workflows.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15178,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology","volume":"37 10","pages":"2317-2325"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jce.70492","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Iatrogenic air entrainment is a preventable embolic hazard in pulsed field ablation (PFA). Mapping catheter insertion through large-bore PFA sheaths may be a vulnerable step, but the roles of catheter geometry and liquid-sealed insertion are unclear.

Methods and Results

In an ex vivo saline tank model, ORION mini-basket and SPIRAL circular mapping catheters were inserted through the FARADRIVE steerable sheath using saline infusion only, continuous manual suction, or liquid-sealed insertion with a custom Adapter Sink. The primary endpoint was macroscopic air recovered distally after each trial of 10 insertions; the trial was the unit of analysis, and 0.2 mL was the smallest quantitatively reportable volume. In 60 trials (600 insertions), mitigation strategy significantly affected air entrainment (Kruskal–Wallis p < 0.001). Under saline infusion alone, ORION generated more air than SPIRAL (23.86 ± 3.63 vs. 7.20 ± 2.09 mL per 10 insertions; 2.39 vs. 0.72 mL per insertion; adjusted p < 0.001). Manual suction reduced entrainment to 3.96 ± 1.01 and 1.02 ± 0.45 mL per 10 insertions (0.40 and 0.10 mL per insertion), but residual air persisted. With liquid-sealed insertion, no visually detectable or quantitatively measurable macroscopic air was observed in any trial.

Conclusions

Air entrainment varied according to mapping-catheter geometry and mitigation strategy. Timed manual suction substantially reduced, but did not abolish, measurable air. Liquid-sealed insertion was associated with no measurable macroscopic air within this ex vivo model, warranting further evaluation under physiologic pressure conditions and in clinical PFA workflows.

通过FARADRIVE护套的迷你篮形和圆形测绘导管的差动气流夹带:用液体密封插入方法缓解。
背景:在脉冲场消融(PFA)中,医源性空气夹带是一种可预防的栓塞危险。通过大口径PFA护套定位导管插入可能是一个脆弱的步骤,但导管几何形状和液体密封插入的作用尚不清楚。方法和结果:在离体生理盐水槽模型中,通过FARADRIVE可操纵鞘插入ORION迷你筐和螺旋圆形测图导管,仅使用生理盐水输注,连续手动吸引或使用定制适配器Sink进行液体密封插入。主要终点是每次试验10次插入后远端恢复的宏观空气;试验为分析单位,0.2 mL为可定量报告的最小体积。在60项试验(600次插入)中,缓解策略显著影响空气夹带(Kruskal-Wallis p)。结论:空气夹带随测图导管几何形状和缓解策略的不同而变化。定时手动吸力大大减少,但没有取消,可测量的空气。在这个离体模型中,液体密封插入与不可测量的宏观空气有关,需要在生理压力条件下和临床PFA工作流程中进行进一步评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
14.80%
发文量
433
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology (JCE) keeps its readership well informed of the latest developments in the study and management of arrhythmic disorders. Edited by Bradley P. Knight, M.D., and a distinguished international editorial board, JCE is the leading journal devoted to the study of the electrophysiology of the heart.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书