Self-tracking inequalities in public health: Mapping the landscape and identifying avenues for research.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Health Pub Date : 2026-09-09 DOI:10.1177/13634593261482082
Bastien Presset, Maiju Tanninen, Matthias Bode, Federico García Baena, Dorthe Brogård Kristensen
{"title":"Self-tracking inequalities in public health: Mapping the landscape and identifying avenues for research.","authors":"Bastien Presset, Maiju Tanninen, Matthias Bode, Federico García Baena, Dorthe Brogård Kristensen","doi":"10.1177/13634593261482082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>While extensive research has been conducted on self-tracking (using devices like smartwatches to monitor behaviours), few studies have investigated the question of inequalities within this area. This creates a critical knowledge gap at a time when self-tracking is rapidly expanding in public health. More specifically, it may fall short of delivering its benefits if its limitations, notably those related to how it spreads across and is adopted by different populations (e.g. older adults, people with lower socioeconomic status), are not properly addressed. This article aims to provide a foundation for studying self-tracking inequalities and to support the more effective integration of self-tracking within public health initiatives. The paper reviews the relevant literature, demonstrating the paucity of attention on the subject and its dispersion across disciplines. It assesses the current theoretical frameworks and offers a definition of self-tracking inequalities designed to facilitate interdisciplinary research.</p>","PeriodicalId":12944,"journal":{"name":"Health","volume":" ","pages":"13634593261482082"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13634593261482082","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While extensive research has been conducted on self-tracking (using devices like smartwatches to monitor behaviours), few studies have investigated the question of inequalities within this area. This creates a critical knowledge gap at a time when self-tracking is rapidly expanding in public health. More specifically, it may fall short of delivering its benefits if its limitations, notably those related to how it spreads across and is adopted by different populations (e.g. older adults, people with lower socioeconomic status), are not properly addressed. This article aims to provide a foundation for studying self-tracking inequalities and to support the more effective integration of self-tracking within public health initiatives. The paper reviews the relevant literature, demonstrating the paucity of attention on the subject and its dispersion across disciplines. It assesses the current theoretical frameworks and offers a definition of self-tracking inequalities designed to facilitate interdisciplinary research.

公共卫生中的自我跟踪不平等现象:绘制图景并确定研究途径。
虽然人们对自我跟踪(使用智能手表等设备监控行为)进行了广泛的研究,但很少有研究调查这一领域的不平等问题。在公共卫生领域自我跟踪迅速扩大之际,这造成了严重的知识差距。更具体地说,如果其局限性,特别是与如何在不同人群中传播和被不同人群(例如老年人、社会经济地位较低的人)采用有关的局限性得不到适当解决,可能无法发挥其效益。本文旨在为研究自我跟踪不平等提供基础,并支持将自我跟踪更有效地纳入公共卫生倡议。本文回顾了相关文献,证明了对该主题的关注不足及其跨学科的分散。它评估了当前的理论框架,并提供了旨在促进跨学科研究的自我跟踪不平等的定义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health
Health Multiple-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Health: is published four times per year and attempts in each number to offer a mix of articles that inform or that provoke debate. The readership of the journal is wide and drawn from different disciplines and from workers both inside and outside the health care professions. Widely abstracted, Health: ensures authors an extensive and informed readership for their work. It also seeks to offer authors as short a delay as possible between submission and publication. Most articles are reviewed within 4-6 weeks of submission and those accepted are published within a year of that decision.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书