Analysis of the pulmonary microbiome in ARDS patients using bronchoalveolar lavage fluid metagenomic next-generation sequencing: a retrospective observational study.

IF 7.5 2区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Xingchen Gao, Ruiqi Qin, Jing He
{"title":"Analysis of the pulmonary microbiome in ARDS patients using bronchoalveolar lavage fluid metagenomic next-generation sequencing: a retrospective observational study.","authors":"Xingchen Gao, Ruiqi Qin, Jing He","doi":"10.1186/s40560-026-00940-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) exhibits significant clinical heterogeneity, with inflammatory subphenotypes (hypoinflammatory and hyperinflammatory) representing a key axis for precision medicine. The role of the pulmonary microbiome in these subphenotypes remains poorly understood.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study enrolled 159 ARDS patients. Using a validated machine-learning classifier, patients were stratified into hypoinflammatory (n=92) and hyperinflammatory (n=67) groups. Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) was analyzed by metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) and conventional microbiological testing (CMT). Clinical characteristics, pathogen profiles, and pulmonary microbiome composition were compared between groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients in the hyperinflammatory phenotype had more severe disease, with significantly higher in-hospital mortality (65.7% vs. 30.4%, P < 0.001) and 28-day mortality (53.7% vs. 22.8%, P < 0.001). mNGS demonstrated superior diagnostic performance, identifying pathogens in 18.2% of cases that were negative by conventional microbiological testing (CMT), whereas CMT alone detected pathogens in only 2.5% of mNGS-negative cases. mNGS showed significant advantages in viral detection (74.5% vs. 28.2%, P < 0.001) and in the identification of mixed infections (74.5% vs. 41.1%, P < 0.001). Acinetobacter baumannii was the most prevalent species in both phenotypes; however, the hyperinflammatory phenotype was enriched for Klebsiella pneumoniae, Legionella pneumophila, and influenza A (H1N1), whereas Stenotrophomonas maltophilia and herpesviruses were more prevalent in the hypoinflammatory phenotype. Species richness was significantly reduced in the hyperinflammatory phenotype (Chao1, P < 0.001; ACE, P = 0.001). In adjusted analyses, this association remained virtually unchanged after adjustment for ARDS etiological category and pulmonary vs. extrapulmonary ARDS, and remained significant in the fully adjusted model additionally accounting for age, sex, and immunosuppression (Chao1: P = 0.002; ACE: P = 0.003). Evenness indices (Shannon/Simpson) and overall community structure (β-diversity; PERMANOVA, P = 0.156) did not differ between phenotypes, suggesting a selective depletion of rare, low-abundance taxa rather than a global restructuring of the pulmonary microbiota. Linear discriminant analysis effect size (LEfSe) identified differentially abundant taxa of exploratory significance: the hyperinflammatory phenotype was enriched for Bifidobacterium dentium and Gemella sanguinis, whereas the hypoinflammatory phenotype was enriched for commensals such as Streptococcus mitis. Network analysis revealed well-defined positive and negative correlations between pathogens and commensal taxa.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The hyperinflammatory phenotype of ARDS is characterized by greater clinical severity and a distinct pulmonary microbiome signature. Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) substantially outperforms conventional methods for etiological diagnosis. LEfSe analysis identified differentially enriched taxa, with the hyperinflammatory phenotype enriched for microorganisms that typically colonize the oral cavity or gut (e.g., Bifidobacterium dentium), suggesting potential microbial translocation along the oral-lung or gut-lung axis. These findings provide a novel microbiome dimension for the precision subphenotyping of ARDS.</p>","PeriodicalId":16123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intensive Care","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13551742/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intensive Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40560-026-00940-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) exhibits significant clinical heterogeneity, with inflammatory subphenotypes (hypoinflammatory and hyperinflammatory) representing a key axis for precision medicine. The role of the pulmonary microbiome in these subphenotypes remains poorly understood.

Methods: This retrospective study enrolled 159 ARDS patients. Using a validated machine-learning classifier, patients were stratified into hypoinflammatory (n=92) and hyperinflammatory (n=67) groups. Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) was analyzed by metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) and conventional microbiological testing (CMT). Clinical characteristics, pathogen profiles, and pulmonary microbiome composition were compared between groups.

Results: Patients in the hyperinflammatory phenotype had more severe disease, with significantly higher in-hospital mortality (65.7% vs. 30.4%, P < 0.001) and 28-day mortality (53.7% vs. 22.8%, P < 0.001). mNGS demonstrated superior diagnostic performance, identifying pathogens in 18.2% of cases that were negative by conventional microbiological testing (CMT), whereas CMT alone detected pathogens in only 2.5% of mNGS-negative cases. mNGS showed significant advantages in viral detection (74.5% vs. 28.2%, P < 0.001) and in the identification of mixed infections (74.5% vs. 41.1%, P < 0.001). Acinetobacter baumannii was the most prevalent species in both phenotypes; however, the hyperinflammatory phenotype was enriched for Klebsiella pneumoniae, Legionella pneumophila, and influenza A (H1N1), whereas Stenotrophomonas maltophilia and herpesviruses were more prevalent in the hypoinflammatory phenotype. Species richness was significantly reduced in the hyperinflammatory phenotype (Chao1, P < 0.001; ACE, P = 0.001). In adjusted analyses, this association remained virtually unchanged after adjustment for ARDS etiological category and pulmonary vs. extrapulmonary ARDS, and remained significant in the fully adjusted model additionally accounting for age, sex, and immunosuppression (Chao1: P = 0.002; ACE: P = 0.003). Evenness indices (Shannon/Simpson) and overall community structure (β-diversity; PERMANOVA, P = 0.156) did not differ between phenotypes, suggesting a selective depletion of rare, low-abundance taxa rather than a global restructuring of the pulmonary microbiota. Linear discriminant analysis effect size (LEfSe) identified differentially abundant taxa of exploratory significance: the hyperinflammatory phenotype was enriched for Bifidobacterium dentium and Gemella sanguinis, whereas the hypoinflammatory phenotype was enriched for commensals such as Streptococcus mitis. Network analysis revealed well-defined positive and negative correlations between pathogens and commensal taxa.

Conclusions: The hyperinflammatory phenotype of ARDS is characterized by greater clinical severity and a distinct pulmonary microbiome signature. Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) substantially outperforms conventional methods for etiological diagnosis. LEfSe analysis identified differentially enriched taxa, with the hyperinflammatory phenotype enriched for microorganisms that typically colonize the oral cavity or gut (e.g., Bifidobacterium dentium), suggesting potential microbial translocation along the oral-lung or gut-lung axis. These findings provide a novel microbiome dimension for the precision subphenotyping of ARDS.

利用支气管肺泡灌洗液宏基因组新一代测序分析ARDS患者的肺微生物组:一项回顾性观察研究。
背景:急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)表现出明显的临床异质性,炎症亚表型(低炎和高炎)代表了精准医学的关键轴。肺微生物组在这些亚表型中的作用仍然知之甚少。方法:回顾性研究纳入159例ARDS患者。使用经过验证的机器学习分类器,将患者分为低炎症组(n=92)和高炎症组(n=67)。采用新一代宏基因组测序(mNGS)和常规微生物检测(CMT)对支气管肺泡灌洗液(BALF)进行分析。比较两组患者的临床特征、病原体特征和肺部微生物组成。结果:高炎症表型患者病情更为严重,住院死亡率(65.7% vs. 30.4%, P < 0.001)和28天死亡率(53.7% vs. 22.8%, P < 0.001)均显著增高。mNGS表现出卓越的诊断能力,在常规微生物检测(CMT)阴性的病例中,18.2%的病例能识别出病原体,而单独使用CMT仅能在mNGS阴性病例中检测到2.5%的病原体。mNGS在病毒检测(74.5%比28.2%,P < 0.001)和混合感染识别(74.5%比41.1%,P < 0.001)方面具有显著优势。鲍曼不动杆菌是两种表型中最常见的菌种;然而,肺炎克雷伯菌、嗜肺军团菌和甲型H1N1流感的高炎症表型丰富,而嗜麦芽窄养单胞菌和疱疹病毒在低炎症表型中更为普遍。高炎症表型显著降低了物种丰富度(Chao1, P < 0.001; ACE, P = 0.001)。在调整后的分析中,在调整了ARDS的病因类型和肺外ARDS与肺外ARDS的相关性后,这种相关性几乎没有变化,并且在考虑年龄、性别和免疫抑制的完全调整模型中仍然显著(Chao1: P = 0.002; ACE: P = 0.003)。均匀度指数(Shannon/Simpson)和总体群落结构(β-多样性;PERMANOVA, P = 0.156)在表型之间没有差异,这表明罕见的低丰度分类群的选择性消耗,而不是肺部微生物群的全球重组。线性判别分析效应大小(LEfSe)确定了差异丰富的具有探索性意义的分类群:牙双歧杆菌和血Gemella sanguinis富集了高炎症表型,而共生菌如链球菌mitis富集了低炎症表型。网络分析显示病原体与共生类群之间存在明确的正相关和负相关关系。结论:ARDS的高炎症表型具有更高的临床严重程度和明显的肺微生物组特征。新一代宏基因组测序(mNGS)在病因诊断方面大大优于传统方法。LEfSe分析确定了差异富集的分类群,其中高炎症表型富集的微生物通常定植于口腔或肠道(例如,牙双歧杆菌),表明潜在的微生物沿口腔-肺或肠-肺轴易位。这些发现为ARDS的精确亚表型提供了一个新的微生物组维度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Intensive Care
Journal of Intensive Care Medicine-Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
CiteScore
11.90
自引率
1.40%
发文量
51
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: "Journal of Intensive Care" is an open access journal dedicated to the comprehensive coverage of intensive care medicine, providing a platform for the latest research and clinical insights in this critical field. The journal covers a wide range of topics, including intensive and critical care, trauma and surgical intensive care, pediatric intensive care, acute and emergency medicine, perioperative medicine, resuscitation, infection control, and organ dysfunction. Recognizing the importance of cultural diversity in healthcare practices, "Journal of Intensive Care" also encourages submissions that explore and discuss the cultural aspects of intensive care, aiming to promote a more inclusive and culturally sensitive approach to patient care. By fostering a global exchange of knowledge and expertise, the journal contributes to the continuous improvement of intensive care practices worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书