Bucur Maria, Eperjesi Orsolya, Panait Robert Iulian, Topala Mihaela, Babakhani Avin Aphrodite, Rancz Anett, Kói Tamás, Fazekas Karen, Obeidat Mahmoud, Papp Renáta, Ferdinándy Péter, Szentesi Andrea, Gheorghe Cristian, Hegyi Peter, Bunduc Stefania
{"title":"Evidence-based ranking of diabetes prevention in prediabetes: A comprehensive network meta-analysis of 378 randomised controlled trials.","authors":"Bucur Maria, Eperjesi Orsolya, Panait Robert Iulian, Topala Mihaela, Babakhani Avin Aphrodite, Rancz Anett, Kói Tamás, Fazekas Karen, Obeidat Mahmoud, Papp Renáta, Ferdinándy Péter, Szentesi Andrea, Gheorghe Cristian, Hegyi Peter, Bunduc Stefania","doi":"10.1002/ctm2.70829","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ten percent of the global population presents impaired glucose tolerance. Although numerous interventions have been investigated to prevent type 2 diabetes (T2D), their comparative effectiveness remains uncertain. In this study, we assessed and ranked current pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions for preventing diabetes in individuals with prediabetes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42023473875). Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) reporting on adult patients with prediabetes undergoing any intervention addressing dysglycaemia were eligible. Our systematic search was conducted from database inception to 19 December 2025 in three databases (MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Library [CENTRAL]). Network meta-analysis was performed using the random-effect frequentist method. Our primary outcomes were the incidence of T2D, haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and 2-h glucose after the glucose oral tolerance test (2hPG) expressed as relative risk (RR) and mean difference (MD), respectively, with the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 378 RCTs comprising 113 122 patients. The highest risk reduction for T2D when compared with control was obtained with dual incretin-based therapy (glucagon-like peptide 1 [GLP-1] and gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP) receptor agonists [GLP-1 + GIP RAs]) (RR = .1, CI [.05; .21]), with GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) ranking second (RR = .26, CI [.19; .4]) followed closely by metformin plus intensive lifestyle intervention (ILI) (RR = .27, CI [.12; .64]). Only curcumin (MD = -.49, CI [-.70; -.28]), dual GLP-1 + GIP RA (MD = -.46, CI [-.63; -.29]), single GLP-1 RA (MD = -.41, CI [-.50; -.31]) and physical activity (MD = -.35, CI [-.48; -.23]) achieved >.3% HbA1c reductions after 1 year. Sulphonylureas and physical activity were most effective for the 1-year FPG decrease, while the greatest 2hPG reduction was obtained with zinc supplementation and sulphonylureas.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Incretin-based therapies, particularly dual GLP-1 + GIP RA and single GLP-1 RA, followed by metformin together with ILI, are the most effective interventions to prevent T2D in patients with prediabetes.</p>","PeriodicalId":10189,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Translational Medicine","volume":"16 9","pages":"e70829"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13554713/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Translational Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ctm2.70829","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Ten percent of the global population presents impaired glucose tolerance. Although numerous interventions have been investigated to prevent type 2 diabetes (T2D), their comparative effectiveness remains uncertain. In this study, we assessed and ranked current pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions for preventing diabetes in individuals with prediabetes.
Methods: The study protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42023473875). Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) reporting on adult patients with prediabetes undergoing any intervention addressing dysglycaemia were eligible. Our systematic search was conducted from database inception to 19 December 2025 in three databases (MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Library [CENTRAL]). Network meta-analysis was performed using the random-effect frequentist method. Our primary outcomes were the incidence of T2D, haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and 2-h glucose after the glucose oral tolerance test (2hPG) expressed as relative risk (RR) and mean difference (MD), respectively, with the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
Results: We included 378 RCTs comprising 113 122 patients. The highest risk reduction for T2D when compared with control was obtained with dual incretin-based therapy (glucagon-like peptide 1 [GLP-1] and gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP) receptor agonists [GLP-1 + GIP RAs]) (RR = .1, CI [.05; .21]), with GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) ranking second (RR = .26, CI [.19; .4]) followed closely by metformin plus intensive lifestyle intervention (ILI) (RR = .27, CI [.12; .64]). Only curcumin (MD = -.49, CI [-.70; -.28]), dual GLP-1 + GIP RA (MD = -.46, CI [-.63; -.29]), single GLP-1 RA (MD = -.41, CI [-.50; -.31]) and physical activity (MD = -.35, CI [-.48; -.23]) achieved >.3% HbA1c reductions after 1 year. Sulphonylureas and physical activity were most effective for the 1-year FPG decrease, while the greatest 2hPG reduction was obtained with zinc supplementation and sulphonylureas.
Conclusion: Incretin-based therapies, particularly dual GLP-1 + GIP RA and single GLP-1 RA, followed by metformin together with ILI, are the most effective interventions to prevent T2D in patients with prediabetes.
期刊介绍:
Clinical and Translational Medicine (CTM) is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access journal dedicated to accelerating the translation of preclinical research into clinical applications and fostering communication between basic and clinical scientists. It highlights the clinical potential and application of various fields including biotechnologies, biomaterials, bioengineering, biomarkers, molecular medicine, omics science, bioinformatics, immunology, molecular imaging, drug discovery, regulation, and health policy. With a focus on the bench-to-bedside approach, CTM prioritizes studies and clinical observations that generate hypotheses relevant to patients and diseases, guiding investigations in cellular and molecular medicine. The journal encourages submissions from clinicians, researchers, policymakers, and industry professionals.