Perceived Value of Board of Pharmacy Specialties Certification Among Hospital Pharmacists in Spain: A Qualitative Interview Study

IF 1.5 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Montserrat Viñas-Bastart, Maria-Estela Moreno-Martínez, Sònia Ruiz-Boy, Jan T. De Pourcq, Cristina Martínez Roca, Maria Josep Carreras-Soler, Miguel Ángel Amor García, Beatriz Salazar-Laya, Vicente Faus Felipe, Amaya Rojo García, Javier Letellez Fernández, Pilar Modamio, Josep Maria Guiu-Segura
{"title":"Perceived Value of Board of Pharmacy Specialties Certification Among Hospital Pharmacists in Spain: A Qualitative Interview Study","authors":"Montserrat Viñas-Bastart,&nbsp;Maria-Estela Moreno-Martínez,&nbsp;Sònia Ruiz-Boy,&nbsp;Jan T. De Pourcq,&nbsp;Cristina Martínez Roca,&nbsp;Maria Josep Carreras-Soler,&nbsp;Miguel Ángel Amor García,&nbsp;Beatriz Salazar-Laya,&nbsp;Vicente Faus Felipe,&nbsp;Amaya Rojo García,&nbsp;Javier Letellez Fernández,&nbsp;Pilar Modamio,&nbsp;Josep Maria Guiu-Segura","doi":"10.1002/jac5.70286","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Board of Pharmacy Specialties certification has emerged internationally as a mechanism to support advanced pharmacy practice and professional differentiation. However, little is known about how BPS-certified pharmacists perceive its value within health care systems with specialist training pathways, such as in Spain. This study aimed to explore the perceived value, professional impact, and implementation barriers of BPS certification among hospital pharmacists in Spain.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A qualitative descriptive study used semi-structured interviews with BPS-certified hospital pharmacists practicing in Spain. Participants were purposively recruited to ensure diversity in certification specialty, geographical region, and profile. Interviews were conducted between April and June 2026, audio-recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using qualitative content analysis. Reporting followed Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Eleven hospital pharmacists representing multiple BPS specialties participated. Participants perceived BPS certification as strengthening clinical competence, improving confidence in pharmacotherapeutic decision-making, and supporting advanced clinical practice. Certification was perceived to enhance professional credibility within interprofessional clinical teams and among pharmacist colleagues. However, participants described limited institutional recognition, with little impact on salary, career progression, employment systems, or protected professional development time. Major barriers included time investment, economic costs, recertification requirements, and partial mismatch between the United States–oriented examination framework and the Spanish health care context. Participants viewed BPS certification as a complementary credential to the national hospital pharmacy residency system rather than a substitute for specialist training. Most anticipated demand for credentialing would continue to increase as hospital pharmacy practice becomes specialized and clinically complex.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>BPS certification is perceived as a valuable mechanism supporting advanced clinical competence, professional differentiation, and integration into interprofessional practice. Nevertheless, broader implementation remains limited by insufficient institutional recognition and structural support. Greater alignment between international credentialing systems and national professional development frameworks may facilitate integration of pharmacy practice credentials within the Spanish health care system.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":73966,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy : JACCP","volume":"9 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jac5.70286","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy : JACCP","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jac5.70286","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Board of Pharmacy Specialties certification has emerged internationally as a mechanism to support advanced pharmacy practice and professional differentiation. However, little is known about how BPS-certified pharmacists perceive its value within health care systems with specialist training pathways, such as in Spain. This study aimed to explore the perceived value, professional impact, and implementation barriers of BPS certification among hospital pharmacists in Spain.

Methods

A qualitative descriptive study used semi-structured interviews with BPS-certified hospital pharmacists practicing in Spain. Participants were purposively recruited to ensure diversity in certification specialty, geographical region, and profile. Interviews were conducted between April and June 2026, audio-recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using qualitative content analysis. Reporting followed Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research.

Results

Eleven hospital pharmacists representing multiple BPS specialties participated. Participants perceived BPS certification as strengthening clinical competence, improving confidence in pharmacotherapeutic decision-making, and supporting advanced clinical practice. Certification was perceived to enhance professional credibility within interprofessional clinical teams and among pharmacist colleagues. However, participants described limited institutional recognition, with little impact on salary, career progression, employment systems, or protected professional development time. Major barriers included time investment, economic costs, recertification requirements, and partial mismatch between the United States–oriented examination framework and the Spanish health care context. Participants viewed BPS certification as a complementary credential to the national hospital pharmacy residency system rather than a substitute for specialist training. Most anticipated demand for credentialing would continue to increase as hospital pharmacy practice becomes specialized and clinically complex.

Conclusions

BPS certification is perceived as a valuable mechanism supporting advanced clinical competence, professional differentiation, and integration into interprofessional practice. Nevertheless, broader implementation remains limited by insufficient institutional recognition and structural support. Greater alignment between international credentialing systems and national professional development frameworks may facilitate integration of pharmacy practice credentials within the Spanish health care system.

西班牙医院药剂师对药学专业认证委员会的感知价值:一项质性访谈研究
药学专业委员会认证作为一种支持高级药学实践和专业差异化的机制在国际上出现。然而,对于bps认证的药剂师如何看待其在具有专业培训途径的卫生保健系统中的价值,例如在西班牙,人们知之甚少。本研究旨在探讨西班牙医院药师对BPS认证的认知价值、职业影响及实施障碍。方法采用半结构化访谈法对西班牙执业的bps认证医院药剂师进行定性描述性研究。参与者的招募是有目的的,以确保认证专业、地理区域和概况的多样性。访谈于2026年4月至6月进行,录音,转录,并使用定性内容分析进行分析。报告遵循定性研究报告的统一标准。结果11名来自BPS多个专科的医院药师参与了调查。参与者认为BPS认证可以增强临床能力,提高药物治疗决策的信心,并支持先进的临床实践。认证被认为可以提高跨专业临床团队和药剂师同事之间的专业信誉。然而,参与者描述了有限的机构认可,对工资、职业发展、就业制度或受保护的专业发展时间几乎没有影响。主要障碍包括时间投资、经济成本、重新认证要求,以及以美国为导向的考试框架与西班牙卫生保健环境之间的部分不匹配。与会者认为,BPS认证是国家医院药房住院医师制度的补充证书,而不是专家培训的替代品。随着医院药房实践的专业化和临床复杂性的增加,对资格证书的预期需求将继续增加。结论BPS认证被认为是一种有价值的机制,支持高级临床能力、专业差异化和跨专业实践的整合。然而,由于机构认识和结构支持不足,更广泛的执行仍然受到限制。国际认证体系和国家专业发展框架之间的更大一致性可能促进西班牙卫生保健系统内药房实践证书的整合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书