Jorge de Torres Rodríguez, Jorge Rouco Collazo, Valeria Leticia Franco Salvi, Manuel Antonio Franco Fernández, Mohamed Abdi Allamagen, Carolina Cornax Gómez, Mario Llorente García, Mesfin Getachew, Adrián de la Torre García, Juan Montegú, Worku Derara, Álvaro Minguito Palomares, Khalid Abdilahi Abdi
{"title":"Breaking Borders: The Medieval Archaeology of the Ethiopian-Somaliland Borderland","authors":"Jorge de Torres Rodríguez, Jorge Rouco Collazo, Valeria Leticia Franco Salvi, Manuel Antonio Franco Fernández, Mohamed Abdi Allamagen, Carolina Cornax Gómez, Mario Llorente García, Mesfin Getachew, Adrián de la Torre García, Juan Montegú, Worku Derara, Álvaro Minguito Palomares, Khalid Abdilahi Abdi","doi":"10.1007/s10437-026-09660-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This article examines the impact of colonial borders on the interpretation of medieval archaeology in the Horn of Africa, focusing on the region now divided between Ethiopia and Somaliland. The boundary established in the 1930s fragmented what had historically been an integrated cultural and economic landscape, leading to uneven research trajectories and hindering the reconstruction of historical processes whose scope transcended modern political limits. Through an archaeological project conducted between 2022 and 2025 in the Aw Bare and Harawo woredas of Ethiopia’s Somali Region, nineteen sites—fifteen previously unknown for the academic literature—were identified and documented, allowing for a reassessment of medieval Muslim settlement patterns between the thirteenth and seventeenth centuries. The results reveal a hierarchical sedentary occupation, ranging from major urban centers such as Aw Bare and Aw Boba to medium-sized villages, small hamlets, and isolated dwellings, alongside defensive structures and specialized cemeteries. Excavations at Aiyanle produced a detailed stratigraphic sequence, imported materials, and radiocarbon dates that place the site’s peak during the rule of the Barr Saʿd al-Dīn Sultanate, followed by a decline associated with its collapse in the late sixteenth century. In parallel, substantial evidence of nomadic occupation was recorded, including ritual aggregation sites, cemeteries, and craft-related activity areas. Together, these data reveal a densely occupied and highly complex landscape in which sedentary and nomadic communities interacted dynamically. The findings also challenge interpretations shaped by contemporary borders and offer new insights into territorial organization, economic strategies, and religious practices in the medieval Muslim Horn of Africa.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46493,"journal":{"name":"African Archaeological Review","volume":"43 3","pages":"453 - 494"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10437-026-09660-0.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Archaeological Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10437-026-09660-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This article examines the impact of colonial borders on the interpretation of medieval archaeology in the Horn of Africa, focusing on the region now divided between Ethiopia and Somaliland. The boundary established in the 1930s fragmented what had historically been an integrated cultural and economic landscape, leading to uneven research trajectories and hindering the reconstruction of historical processes whose scope transcended modern political limits. Through an archaeological project conducted between 2022 and 2025 in the Aw Bare and Harawo woredas of Ethiopia’s Somali Region, nineteen sites—fifteen previously unknown for the academic literature—were identified and documented, allowing for a reassessment of medieval Muslim settlement patterns between the thirteenth and seventeenth centuries. The results reveal a hierarchical sedentary occupation, ranging from major urban centers such as Aw Bare and Aw Boba to medium-sized villages, small hamlets, and isolated dwellings, alongside defensive structures and specialized cemeteries. Excavations at Aiyanle produced a detailed stratigraphic sequence, imported materials, and radiocarbon dates that place the site’s peak during the rule of the Barr Saʿd al-Dīn Sultanate, followed by a decline associated with its collapse in the late sixteenth century. In parallel, substantial evidence of nomadic occupation was recorded, including ritual aggregation sites, cemeteries, and craft-related activity areas. Together, these data reveal a densely occupied and highly complex landscape in which sedentary and nomadic communities interacted dynamically. The findings also challenge interpretations shaped by contemporary borders and offer new insights into territorial organization, economic strategies, and religious practices in the medieval Muslim Horn of Africa.
本文考察了殖民边界对非洲之角中世纪考古解释的影响,重点是现在埃塞俄比亚和索马里兰之间的地区。20世纪30年代确立的边界割裂了历史上一体化的文化和经济景观,导致研究轨迹不平衡,阻碍了历史进程的重建,其范围超越了现代政治限制。通过一项于2022年至2025年间在埃塞俄比亚索马里地区的Aw Bare和Harawo地区进行的考古项目,19个遗址(其中15个以前在学术文献中未知)被确定并记录下来,从而可以重新评估13世纪至17世纪之间的中世纪穆斯林定居模式。研究结果揭示了一个等级森严的定居职业,从主要的城市中心(如Aw Bare和Aw Boba)到中等规模的村庄、小村庄和孤立的住所,以及防御结构和专门的墓地。在Aiyanle的挖掘工作产生了详细的地层序列、进口材料和放射性碳年代,这些都表明该遗址在Barr Sa al- d al- d n苏丹国统治期间达到顶峰,随后在16世纪后期随着其崩溃而下降。与此同时,游牧民族占领的大量证据也被记录下来,包括仪式聚集地、墓地和与手工艺相关的活动区。总之,这些数据揭示了一个密集居住和高度复杂的景观,其中定居和游牧社区动态互动。这些发现也挑战了当代边界所形成的解释,并为中世纪穆斯林非洲之角的领土组织、经济战略和宗教习俗提供了新的见解。
期刊介绍:
African Archaeological Review publishes original research articles, review essays, reports, book/media reviews, and forums/commentaries on African archaeology, highlighting the contributions of the African continent to critical global issues in the past and present. Relevant topics include the emergence of modern humans and earliest manifestations of human culture; subsistence, agricultural, and technological innovations; and social complexity, as well as topical issues on heritage. The journal features timely continental and subcontinental studies covering cultural and historical processes; interregional interactions; biocultural evolution; cultural dynamics and ecology; the role of cultural materials in politics, ideology, and religion; different dimensions of economic life; the application of historical, textual, ethnoarchaeological, and archaeometric data in archaeological interpretation; and the intersections of cultural heritage, information technology, and community/public archaeology.