Living with Uncertainty: Ontological Insecurity and Mutual Victimhood in Rohingya–Host Relations

IF 2.9 1区 社会学 Q1 DEMOGRAPHY
Tuhin Roy, M M Abdullah Al Mamun Sony, Md Kamrul Hasan, Shima Chowdhury
{"title":"Living with Uncertainty: Ontological Insecurity and Mutual Victimhood in Rohingya–Host Relations","authors":"Tuhin Roy, M M Abdullah Al Mamun Sony, Md Kamrul Hasan, Shima Chowdhury","doi":"10.1177/01979183261466206","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines the transformation of relations between Rohingya refugees and host communities in southeastern Bangladesh, documenting a shift from early hospitality to entrenched hostility under conditions of protracted displacement. Drawing on qualitative fieldwork, including in-depth interviews and sustained observation, the study moves beyond refugee-center or host-burden frameworks to analyze displacement as a relational process. Anchored in the concept of ontological insecurity, the findings show that prolonged uncertainty destabilizes the moral and social certainties of both communities, generating reciprocal perceptions of abandonment, insecurity, and loss of dignity. Informal economic interdependence and gendered labor displacement intensify psychosocial distress, translating structural inequality into moral resentment and social withdrawal. Rather than fostering solidarity, shared precarity produces a condition of mutual victimhood in which suffering becomes comparative and competing, reinforcing stigma and dehumanization. The article argues that without institutional mechanisms capable of restoring recognition and ontological security for both refugees and hosts, displacement governance risks entrenching durable social fracture rather than enabling coexistence.","PeriodicalId":48229,"journal":{"name":"International Migration Review","volume":"79 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Migration Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01979183261466206","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEMOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article examines the transformation of relations between Rohingya refugees and host communities in southeastern Bangladesh, documenting a shift from early hospitality to entrenched hostility under conditions of protracted displacement. Drawing on qualitative fieldwork, including in-depth interviews and sustained observation, the study moves beyond refugee-center or host-burden frameworks to analyze displacement as a relational process. Anchored in the concept of ontological insecurity, the findings show that prolonged uncertainty destabilizes the moral and social certainties of both communities, generating reciprocal perceptions of abandonment, insecurity, and loss of dignity. Informal economic interdependence and gendered labor displacement intensify psychosocial distress, translating structural inequality into moral resentment and social withdrawal. Rather than fostering solidarity, shared precarity produces a condition of mutual victimhood in which suffering becomes comparative and competing, reinforcing stigma and dehumanization. The article argues that without institutional mechanisms capable of restoring recognition and ontological security for both refugees and hosts, displacement governance risks entrenching durable social fracture rather than enabling coexistence.
生活在不确定性中:罗兴亚人与东道国关系中的本体不安全感和相互受害者
本文考察了孟加拉国东南部罗兴亚难民与收容社区之间关系的转变,记录了在长期流离失所的情况下,从早期的好客到根深蒂固的敌意的转变。通过定性实地调查,包括深入访谈和持续观察,该研究超越了难民中心或东道国负担框架,将流离失所作为一个关系过程进行分析。基于本体论不安全感的概念,研究结果表明,长期的不确定性破坏了两个社区的道德和社会确定性,产生了被遗弃、不安全感和尊严丧失的相互感知。非正式的经济相互依赖和性别劳动流离失所加剧了社会心理痛苦,将结构性不平等转化为道德怨恨和社会退缩。共同的不稳定不仅不能促进团结,反而会造成相互受害的情况,在这种情况下,痛苦变成了比较和竞争,加剧了耻辱和非人化。本文认为,如果没有能够为难民和收容方恢复承认和本体安全的制度机制,流离失所治理就有可能巩固持久的社会破裂,而不是实现共存。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
7.90%
发文量
69
期刊介绍: International Migration Review is an interdisciplinary peer-reviewed journal created to encourage and facilitate the study of all aspects of sociodemographic, historical, economic, political, legislative and international migration. It is internationally regarded as the principal journal in the field facilitating study of international migration, ethnic group relations, and refugee movements. Through an interdisciplinary approach and from an international perspective, IMR provides the single most comprehensive forum devoted exclusively to the analysis and review of international population movements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书