Parenteral iron overdose: a scoping review.

IF 3.3
Hung-Hsiang Chen, Shih-Hao Wu, Han-Wei Mu, Dong-Zong Hung
{"title":"Parenteral iron overdose: a scoping review.","authors":"Hung-Hsiang Chen, Shih-Hao Wu, Han-Wei Mu, Dong-Zong Hung","doi":"10.1080/15563650.2026.2727916","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Parenteral iron formulations are increasingly used worldwide for the treatment of iron deficiency anemia, yet clinical guidance for managing parenteral iron overdose is limited. Existing risk assessment and management frameworks, including the widely cited serum iron concentration threshold of 500 µg/dL, are derived primarily from oral iron poisoning and may not be directly applicable to parenteral exposures. This scoping review aims to map the existing literature on parenteral iron overdose, summarize exposure patterns, clinical presentations, laboratory findings, therapeutic interventions, and outcomes, and identify knowledge gaps to inform future clinical practice and research.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A scoping review was conducted following the Arksey and O'Malley framework and reported in accordance with the PRISMA extension for scoping reviews. Embase, Ovid MEDLINE, and Cochrane CENTRAL were searched through 31 December 2025, supplemented by Google Scholar and citation searching. Eligible studies described human reports of parenteral iron overdose or supratherapeutic repeated administration with sufficient original clinical detail. Two reviewers independently screened studies and extracted data, with disagreements resolved by a third reviewer. Findings were synthesized descriptively, and recurring patterns were identified through thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventeen reports comprising 49 patients, published between 1995 and 2025, met the inclusion criteria. Most reports were single-patient case reports (14/17, 82.4%), and nearly half were conference abstracts (8/17, 47.1%), reflecting an evidence base composed predominantly of low-volume, case-level data. Exposures clustered into acute single-dose overdose (12/29 classifiable cases, 41.4%) and subacute cumulative overexposure (17/29, 58.6%). Iron sucrose and iron dextran predominated among acute reports, whereas ferric hydroxide polymaltose complex predominated among subacute cases (76.5%). Serum iron concentration did not consistently correspond to clinical severity: several cases with concentrations between 825 and greater than 2,000 µg/dL remained asymptomatic, whereas one case with a concentration of approximately 112 µg/dL developed shock, disseminated intravascular coagulation, and multiorgan failure. Liver toxicity was reported mainly in subacute cumulative cases (82.4%) but in none of the acute cases. Chelation practice varied widely: four acute overdose patients recovered without chelation despite serum iron concentrations of 1,301-1,830 µg/dL, whereas asymptomatic patients in other reports received prolonged chelation. Overall, 48 of the 49 included patients survived.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The findings converge on three recurring themes. Parenteral iron overdose appears to represent a heterogeneous clinical syndrome distinct from classic oral iron poisoning, with phenotypes ranging from asymptomatic hyperferremia to infusion reaction-like presentations and subacute hepatic iron-loading syndromes. Conventional laboratory markers, particularly serum iron concentration, may not reliably reflect toxicologically active iron after parenteral exposure, likely reflecting biphasic kinetics, formulation-dependent iron release, and analytical interference from carbohydrate-bound iron. Chelation decisions may be better informed by clinical trajectory and exposure phenotype than by serum iron concentration alone.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Parenteral iron overdose appears to differ from oral iron poisoning in pathophysiology, laboratory behavior, and management considerations. Oral iron thresholds may not be directly applicable, and management may be better guided by clinical trajectory than by laboratory values alone. Given the limited quantity and heterogeneous quality of existing evidence, these observations should be interpreted as hypothesis-generating. Standardized reporting of parenteral iron overdose and multicenter pharmacovigilance collaborations are needed to clarify the true incidence and severity spectrum of this underrecognized medication safety issue.</p>","PeriodicalId":520593,"journal":{"name":"Clinical toxicology (Philadelphia, Pa.)","volume":" ","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical toxicology (Philadelphia, Pa.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15563650.2026.2727916","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Parenteral iron formulations are increasingly used worldwide for the treatment of iron deficiency anemia, yet clinical guidance for managing parenteral iron overdose is limited. Existing risk assessment and management frameworks, including the widely cited serum iron concentration threshold of 500 µg/dL, are derived primarily from oral iron poisoning and may not be directly applicable to parenteral exposures. This scoping review aims to map the existing literature on parenteral iron overdose, summarize exposure patterns, clinical presentations, laboratory findings, therapeutic interventions, and outcomes, and identify knowledge gaps to inform future clinical practice and research.

Methods: A scoping review was conducted following the Arksey and O'Malley framework and reported in accordance with the PRISMA extension for scoping reviews. Embase, Ovid MEDLINE, and Cochrane CENTRAL were searched through 31 December 2025, supplemented by Google Scholar and citation searching. Eligible studies described human reports of parenteral iron overdose or supratherapeutic repeated administration with sufficient original clinical detail. Two reviewers independently screened studies and extracted data, with disagreements resolved by a third reviewer. Findings were synthesized descriptively, and recurring patterns were identified through thematic analysis.

Results: Seventeen reports comprising 49 patients, published between 1995 and 2025, met the inclusion criteria. Most reports were single-patient case reports (14/17, 82.4%), and nearly half were conference abstracts (8/17, 47.1%), reflecting an evidence base composed predominantly of low-volume, case-level data. Exposures clustered into acute single-dose overdose (12/29 classifiable cases, 41.4%) and subacute cumulative overexposure (17/29, 58.6%). Iron sucrose and iron dextran predominated among acute reports, whereas ferric hydroxide polymaltose complex predominated among subacute cases (76.5%). Serum iron concentration did not consistently correspond to clinical severity: several cases with concentrations between 825 and greater than 2,000 µg/dL remained asymptomatic, whereas one case with a concentration of approximately 112 µg/dL developed shock, disseminated intravascular coagulation, and multiorgan failure. Liver toxicity was reported mainly in subacute cumulative cases (82.4%) but in none of the acute cases. Chelation practice varied widely: four acute overdose patients recovered without chelation despite serum iron concentrations of 1,301-1,830 µg/dL, whereas asymptomatic patients in other reports received prolonged chelation. Overall, 48 of the 49 included patients survived.

Discussion: The findings converge on three recurring themes. Parenteral iron overdose appears to represent a heterogeneous clinical syndrome distinct from classic oral iron poisoning, with phenotypes ranging from asymptomatic hyperferremia to infusion reaction-like presentations and subacute hepatic iron-loading syndromes. Conventional laboratory markers, particularly serum iron concentration, may not reliably reflect toxicologically active iron after parenteral exposure, likely reflecting biphasic kinetics, formulation-dependent iron release, and analytical interference from carbohydrate-bound iron. Chelation decisions may be better informed by clinical trajectory and exposure phenotype than by serum iron concentration alone.

Conclusion: Parenteral iron overdose appears to differ from oral iron poisoning in pathophysiology, laboratory behavior, and management considerations. Oral iron thresholds may not be directly applicable, and management may be better guided by clinical trajectory than by laboratory values alone. Given the limited quantity and heterogeneous quality of existing evidence, these observations should be interpreted as hypothesis-generating. Standardized reporting of parenteral iron overdose and multicenter pharmacovigilance collaborations are needed to clarify the true incidence and severity spectrum of this underrecognized medication safety issue.

肠外铁过量:范围审查。
世界范围内越来越多地使用肠外铁制剂治疗缺铁性贫血,但管理肠外铁过量的临床指导是有限的。现有的风险评估和管理框架,包括广泛引用的血清铁浓度阈值500µg/dL,主要来自口服铁中毒,可能不直接适用于肠外暴露。本综述的目的是绘制关于肠外铁过量的现有文献,总结暴露模式、临床表现、实验室结果、治疗干预和结果,并确定知识差距,为未来的临床实践和研究提供信息。方法:根据Arksey和O'Malley框架进行范围审查,并根据PRISMA范围审查扩展报告。Embase、Ovid MEDLINE和Cochrane CENTRAL检索截止到2025年12月31日,并辅以谷歌Scholar和引文检索。符合条件的研究描述了人类肠外铁过量或超治疗重复给药的报告,具有足够的原始临床细节。两位审稿人独立筛选研究和提取数据,分歧由第三位审稿人解决。对调查结果进行描述性综合,并通过专题分析确定重复模式。结果:1995年至2025年间发表的17份报告,包括49例患者,符合纳入标准。大多数报告是单患者病例报告(14/17,82.4%),近一半是会议摘要(8/17,47.1%),反映了证据基础主要由小容量,病例级数据组成。暴露集中在急性单剂量过量(12/29可分类病例,41.4%)和亚急性累积过度暴露(17/29,58.6%)。蔗糖铁和右旋糖酐铁在急性病例中占主导地位,而氢氧化铁聚麦芽糖复合物在亚急性病例中占主导地位(76.5%)。血清铁浓度与临床严重程度并不一致:几例浓度在825至大于2000µg/dL之间的患者仍无症状,而1例浓度约为112µg/dL的患者出现休克、弥散性血管内凝血和多器官衰竭。肝毒性主要见于亚急性累积病例(82.4%),急性病例无肝毒性报告。螯合实践差异很大:尽管血清铁浓度为1,301-1,830 μ g/dL,但4例急性过量患者无需螯合即可恢复,而其他报告中的无症状患者则接受了长时间的螯合。总的来说,49例患者中有48例存活。讨论:研究结果集中在三个反复出现的主题上。肠外铁过量似乎代表了一种不同于经典口服铁中毒的异质性临床综合征,其表型范围从无症状高铁血症到输液反应样表现和亚急性肝铁负荷综合征。传统的实验室标记物,特别是血清铁浓度,可能不能可靠地反映肠外暴露后的毒性活性铁,可能反映双相动力学、配方依赖的铁释放和碳水化合物结合铁的分析干扰。临床轨迹和暴露表型可能比单独的血清铁浓度更好地告知螯合决定。结论:肠外铁过量与口服铁中毒在病理生理、实验室行为和处理考虑方面有所不同。口服铁阈值可能不直接适用,管理可能更好地指导临床轨迹比实验室值单独。鉴于现有证据的数量有限和质量不均,这些观察结果应被解释为假设生成。需要标准化的肠外铁过量报告和多中心药物警戒合作,以澄清这一未被充分认识的药物安全问题的真实发生率和严重程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书