Psychotropic Polypharmacy in Alzheimer's Disease: A Potentially Inappropriate Medication Perspective in Older Adults.

IF 1.9
Kang-Jinyuan Gou, Yuhao Chen, Zehu Sheng, Weihua Yu, Lanyang Wang, Yang Lü
{"title":"Psychotropic Polypharmacy in Alzheimer's Disease: A Potentially Inappropriate Medication Perspective in Older Adults.","authors":"Kang-Jinyuan Gou, Yuhao Chen, Zehu Sheng, Weihua Yu, Lanyang Wang, Yang Lü","doi":"10.2174/0115672050502495260812063626","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) are highly prevalent in Alzheimer's disease (AD). Consequently, potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) use is particularly common among older adults with AD. Psychotropic polypharmacy may increase the risk of various adverse outcomes beyond cognitive decline. Although geriatric prescribing criteria and dementia-care guidelines offer important safety recommendations, a clinically integrated framework for potentially inappropriate psychotropic medication use in older adults with AD remains insufficiently developed. This article is a narrative review rather than a systematic review or meta-analysis. The authors searched the literature in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library, focusing on studies, guidelines, consensus statements, regulatory safety warnings, and medication-safety criteria published between January 2015 and June 2026. This review specifically examines anticholinergic drugs, antipsychotics, benzodiazepines and Z-drugs, tricyclic antidepressants, and select newer antidepressants-including selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs), mirtazapine, trazodone, and paroxetine-guided by the 2023 American Geriatrics Society (AGS) Beers Criteria®. Current evidence indicates that these medications may contribute to cognitive decline through anticholinergic burden, sedation, and pharmacodynamic interactions with cholinesterase inhibitors, such as donepezil and memantine. However, the strength of evidence varies considerably across drug classes and study designs, ranging from randomized controlled trials to observational studies and expert consensus. This study also summarizes current nonpharmacological strategies and proposes a structured clinical medication review framework. Overall, this review highlights the importance of minimizing inappropriate psychotropic use in AD, prioritizing non-pharmacological interventions, and conducting individualized risk-benefit assessments in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":94309,"journal":{"name":"Current Alzheimer research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Alzheimer research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0115672050502495260812063626","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) are highly prevalent in Alzheimer's disease (AD). Consequently, potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) use is particularly common among older adults with AD. Psychotropic polypharmacy may increase the risk of various adverse outcomes beyond cognitive decline. Although geriatric prescribing criteria and dementia-care guidelines offer important safety recommendations, a clinically integrated framework for potentially inappropriate psychotropic medication use in older adults with AD remains insufficiently developed. This article is a narrative review rather than a systematic review or meta-analysis. The authors searched the literature in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library, focusing on studies, guidelines, consensus statements, regulatory safety warnings, and medication-safety criteria published between January 2015 and June 2026. This review specifically examines anticholinergic drugs, antipsychotics, benzodiazepines and Z-drugs, tricyclic antidepressants, and select newer antidepressants-including selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs), mirtazapine, trazodone, and paroxetine-guided by the 2023 American Geriatrics Society (AGS) Beers Criteria®. Current evidence indicates that these medications may contribute to cognitive decline through anticholinergic burden, sedation, and pharmacodynamic interactions with cholinesterase inhibitors, such as donepezil and memantine. However, the strength of evidence varies considerably across drug classes and study designs, ranging from randomized controlled trials to observational studies and expert consensus. This study also summarizes current nonpharmacological strategies and proposes a structured clinical medication review framework. Overall, this review highlights the importance of minimizing inappropriate psychotropic use in AD, prioritizing non-pharmacological interventions, and conducting individualized risk-benefit assessments in clinical practice.

阿尔茨海默病的精神药物综合治疗:老年人潜在的不适当用药视角。
神经精神症状(NPS)在阿尔茨海默病(AD)中非常普遍。因此,潜在不适当的药物(PIM)使用在老年AD患者中尤为常见。多种精神药物可能会增加认知能力下降以外的各种不良后果的风险。尽管老年处方标准和痴呆护理指南提供了重要的安全性建议,但对于老年AD患者可能不适当使用精神药物的临床综合框架仍未充分开发。这篇文章是一个叙述性的回顾,而不是一个系统的回顾或元分析。作者检索了PubMed、Embase和Cochrane图书馆的文献,重点关注2015年1月至2026年6月间发表的研究、指南、共识声明、监管安全警告和药物安全标准。本综述特别研究了抗胆碱能药物、抗精神病药物、苯二氮平类药物和z型药物、三环类抗抑郁药物,并选择了新的抗抑郁药物,包括选择性5 -羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRIs)、5 -羟色胺-去甲肾上腺素再摄取抑制剂(SNRIs)、米氮平、曲唑酮和帕罗西汀,这些药物由2023年美国老年医学会(AGS) Beers标准®指导。目前的证据表明,这些药物可能通过抗胆碱能负担、镇静和与胆碱酯酶抑制剂(如多奈哌齐和美金刚)的药效学相互作用导致认知能力下降。然而,从随机对照试验到观察性研究和专家共识,不同药物类别和研究设计的证据强度差异很大。本研究还总结了当前的非药物策略,并提出了一个结构化的临床药物审查框架。总的来说,这篇综述强调了在临床实践中减少阿尔茨海默病中不适当的精神药物使用、优先考虑非药物干预和进行个性化风险-收益评估的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书