Ceramic Bone Substitutes in Orthopaedic Surgery: Standards, Trends and Future Perspectives.

IF 0.9
Marcus Jäger, Eleftherios Papaeleftheriou, Marcel Haversath, Alexander Wegner, Andrea Sowislok
{"title":"Ceramic Bone Substitutes in Orthopaedic Surgery: Standards, Trends and Future Perspectives.","authors":"Marcus Jäger, Eleftherios Papaeleftheriou, Marcel Haversath, Alexander Wegner, Andrea Sowislok","doi":"10.1055/a-2938-4578","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>In contrast to other tissues and organs, bone and its marrow have been successfully transplanted to promote bone healing for more than 100 years. Nevertheless, the amount of autologous bone grafts is limited and associated with relevant donor site morbidity. Therefore, intensive efforts have been made to develop adequate bone substitute materials. In combination with regenerative strategies including the application of bone marrow /mononuclear stroma cells, growth factors, cytokines (VEGF, PDGF, BMP2 etc.) as well as extracellular vesicles (EVs), bone substitutes (BS) may augment, supplement or even replace autologous bone grafts. BS provide a three-dimensional network that allows guided cellular migration, proliferation, differentiation, and mineralisation. In accordance with bionic principles, defined CaP-based BS have shown promising clinical results and are frequently applied in daily orthopaedic practice. In recent years and with better understanding, new technologies have been introduced in this area. These trends include ex vivo coating strategies for BS, the implementation of AI in BS design and planning, the combination with growth factors such as NELL-1 or P-15, the consideration of osteoimmunologic aspects, and the application of new material composites. In this study, we provide an overview and update to well-established standards and innovations in the field of ceramic BS and discuss findings reported in the literature.</p>","PeriodicalId":94274,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Orthopadie und Unfallchirurgie","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift fur Orthopadie und Unfallchirurgie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2938-4578","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: In contrast to other tissues and organs, bone and its marrow have been successfully transplanted to promote bone healing for more than 100 years. Nevertheless, the amount of autologous bone grafts is limited and associated with relevant donor site morbidity. Therefore, intensive efforts have been made to develop adequate bone substitute materials. In combination with regenerative strategies including the application of bone marrow /mononuclear stroma cells, growth factors, cytokines (VEGF, PDGF, BMP2 etc.) as well as extracellular vesicles (EVs), bone substitutes (BS) may augment, supplement or even replace autologous bone grafts. BS provide a three-dimensional network that allows guided cellular migration, proliferation, differentiation, and mineralisation. In accordance with bionic principles, defined CaP-based BS have shown promising clinical results and are frequently applied in daily orthopaedic practice. In recent years and with better understanding, new technologies have been introduced in this area. These trends include ex vivo coating strategies for BS, the implementation of AI in BS design and planning, the combination with growth factors such as NELL-1 or P-15, the consideration of osteoimmunologic aspects, and the application of new material composites. In this study, we provide an overview and update to well-established standards and innovations in the field of ceramic BS and discuss findings reported in the literature.

陶瓷骨替代品在骨科手术:标准,趋势和未来展望。
摘要:与其他组织和器官不同,骨及其骨髓移植促进骨愈合已有100多年的历史。然而,自体骨移植物的数量是有限的,并与相关的供体部位发病率有关。因此,人们一直在努力开发合适的骨替代材料。结合骨髓/单核基质细胞、生长因子、细胞因子(VEGF、PDGF、BMP2等)以及细胞外囊泡(ev)等再生策略,骨替代物(BS)可以增强、补充甚至替代自体骨移植物。BS提供了一个三维网络,允许引导细胞迁移,增殖,分化和矿化。根据仿生学原理,定义的CaP-based BS已显示出良好的临床效果,并在日常骨科实践中得到广泛应用。近年来,随着对这一领域理解的加深,新技术被引入这一领域。这些趋势包括BS的体外涂层策略、AI在BS设计和规划中的应用、与生长因子(如NELL-1或P-15)的结合、骨免疫学方面的考虑以及新材料复合材料的应用。在本研究中,我们对陶瓷BS领域的成熟标准和创新进行了概述和更新,并讨论了文献报道的发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书