Etanercept in Steroid-Refractory Acute Graft Versus Host Disease: Clinical Response, Toxicity, and Long-Term Outcomes.

Blood cell therapy Pub Date : 2026-07-03 eCollection Date: 2026-08-25 DOI:10.31547/bct-2026-003
Akanksha Chichra, Sachin Punatar, Anant Gokarn, Sumeet Mirgh, Nishant Jindal, Gaurav Bain, Vijay Shirure, Vinodhini M, Avinash Bonda, Lingaraj Nayak, Bhausaheb Bagal, Sadhana Kannan, Libin Mathew, Navin Khattry
{"title":"Etanercept in Steroid-Refractory Acute Graft Versus Host Disease: Clinical Response, Toxicity, and Long-Term Outcomes.","authors":"Akanksha Chichra, Sachin Punatar, Anant Gokarn, Sumeet Mirgh, Nishant Jindal, Gaurav Bain, Vijay Shirure, Vinodhini M, Avinash Bonda, Lingaraj Nayak, Bhausaheb Bagal, Sadhana Kannan, Libin Mathew, Navin Khattry","doi":"10.31547/bct-2026-003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Steroid refractory acute graft versus host disease (SR-aGVHD) is seen in 30%-40% of patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (allo HSCT). We report our experience with etanercept (ETA) as a first-line treatment for SR-aGVHD during a period when ruxolitinib was not available in India. We retrospectively analysed 43 allo HSCT patients from 2010 to 2019 who received ETA for SR-aGVHD. The primary objective was to assess the overall response rate with etanercept. Secondary objectives included overall survival (OS), organ specific responses, causes of mortality and identification of factors associated with survival and see its utility in the current ruxolitinib era. The response rates (overall response rate [ORR] - complete response [CR] + very good partial response [VGPR] + partial response [PR]) at Day 28 was 69%. The organ-specific ORR was 70% (lower gut), 67% (skin), and 50% (liver). The median OS of responders at Day 28 from ETA start was 6.8 months versus 2.8 months in non-responders (<i>p</i>=0.0008). Patients in whom a reduction in the systemic steroid dose of ≥ 30% by Day 28 from ETA start was possible had a significantly longer median OS (9.5 months versus 3.5 months; <i>p</i>=0.0001). In multivariate analysis, steroid dose reduction of ≥ 30% by Day 28 of the start of ETA was a significant factor for survival (<i>p</i>=0.015). The cause of death in the majority was infection (90%). ETA, used as a second-line agent, has shown an acceptable ORR for SR-aGVHD in our cohort. Despite the good response rates, the group had a high transplantation-related mortality. Infections were the major cause of mortality, and early tapering of systemic steroids may be the key to improving outcomes. In the current ruxolitinib era, etanercept may hold a place in patients where ruxolitinib has failed or is not feasible.</p>","PeriodicalId":72423,"journal":{"name":"Blood cell therapy","volume":"9 3","pages":"95-103"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13548093/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Blood cell therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31547/bct-2026-003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Steroid refractory acute graft versus host disease (SR-aGVHD) is seen in 30%-40% of patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (allo HSCT). We report our experience with etanercept (ETA) as a first-line treatment for SR-aGVHD during a period when ruxolitinib was not available in India. We retrospectively analysed 43 allo HSCT patients from 2010 to 2019 who received ETA for SR-aGVHD. The primary objective was to assess the overall response rate with etanercept. Secondary objectives included overall survival (OS), organ specific responses, causes of mortality and identification of factors associated with survival and see its utility in the current ruxolitinib era. The response rates (overall response rate [ORR] - complete response [CR] + very good partial response [VGPR] + partial response [PR]) at Day 28 was 69%. The organ-specific ORR was 70% (lower gut), 67% (skin), and 50% (liver). The median OS of responders at Day 28 from ETA start was 6.8 months versus 2.8 months in non-responders (p=0.0008). Patients in whom a reduction in the systemic steroid dose of ≥ 30% by Day 28 from ETA start was possible had a significantly longer median OS (9.5 months versus 3.5 months; p=0.0001). In multivariate analysis, steroid dose reduction of ≥ 30% by Day 28 of the start of ETA was a significant factor for survival (p=0.015). The cause of death in the majority was infection (90%). ETA, used as a second-line agent, has shown an acceptable ORR for SR-aGVHD in our cohort. Despite the good response rates, the group had a high transplantation-related mortality. Infections were the major cause of mortality, and early tapering of systemic steroids may be the key to improving outcomes. In the current ruxolitinib era, etanercept may hold a place in patients where ruxolitinib has failed or is not feasible.

依那西普治疗类固醇难治性急性移植物抗宿主病:临床反应、毒性和长期结果。
类固醇难治性急性移植物抗宿主病(SR-aGVHD)见于30%-40%接受同种异体造血干细胞移植(allo HSCT)的患者。我们报告了在印度鲁索利替尼不可用期间,依那西普(ETA)作为SR-aGVHD一线治疗的经验。我们回顾性分析了2010年至2019年接受ETA治疗SR-aGVHD的43例同种异体移植患者。主要目的是评估依那西普的总有效率。次要目标包括总生存期(OS)、器官特异性反应、死亡原因和确定与生存相关的因素,并观察其在当前ruxolitinib时代的实用性。第28天的缓解率(总缓解率[ORR] -完全缓解[CR] +非常好的部分缓解[VGPR] +部分缓解[PR])为69%。器官特异性ORR为70%(下肠),67%(皮肤)和50%(肝脏)。从ETA开始第28天起,应答者的中位OS为6.8个月,而非应答者的中位OS为2.8个月(p=0.0008)。从ETA开始到第28天,全身类固醇剂量减少≥30%的患者有可能有更长的中位生存期(9.5个月vs 3.5个月;p=0.0001)。在多变量分析中,到ETA开始的第28天类固醇剂量减少≥30%是生存的重要因素(p=0.015)。死亡的主要原因是感染(90%)。作为二线药物的ETA在我们的队列中显示出可接受的SR-aGVHD ORR。尽管反应率很好,但该组与移植相关的死亡率很高。感染是死亡的主要原因,尽早减少全身性类固醇治疗可能是改善预后的关键。在目前的ruxolitinib时代,依那西普可能在ruxolitinib无效或不可行的患者中占有一席之地。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书