Diving MCA and First-Pass Effect: A Subgroup Analysis From the ARISE II Study.

IF 3.1 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.) Pub Date : 2026-08-21 eCollection Date: 2026-09-01 DOI:10.1161/SVIN.125.002247
Yazan Ashouri, Mohammad AlMajali, Amit Chaudhari, Tommy Andersson, Jeffrey L Saver, Alex Bou Chebl, Saif Bushnaq, Nicholas Liaw, Hormozd Bozorgchami, Marc Ribo, Varun Chaubal, Heinrich P Mattle, René Chapot, Ana Paula Narata, Olivier François, Ashutosh P Jadhav, Jonathan A Grossberg, Christian Heiner Riedel, Alejandro Tomasello, Wayne M Clark, Hannes Nordmeyer, Eugene Lin, Raul G Nogueira, Albert J Yoo, Tudor G Jovin, Adnan H Siddiqui, Osama O Zaidat
{"title":"Diving MCA and First-Pass Effect: A Subgroup Analysis From the ARISE II Study.","authors":"Yazan Ashouri, Mohammad AlMajali, Amit Chaudhari, Tommy Andersson, Jeffrey L Saver, Alex Bou Chebl, Saif Bushnaq, Nicholas Liaw, Hormozd Bozorgchami, Marc Ribo, Varun Chaubal, Heinrich P Mattle, René Chapot, Ana Paula Narata, Olivier François, Ashutosh P Jadhav, Jonathan A Grossberg, Christian Heiner Riedel, Alejandro Tomasello, Wayne M Clark, Hannes Nordmeyer, Eugene Lin, Raul G Nogueira, Albert J Yoo, Tudor G Jovin, Adnan H Siddiqui, Osama O Zaidat","doi":"10.1161/SVIN.125.002247","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The impact of internal carotid artery tortuosity on achieving first-pass effect in mechanical thrombectomy has been described; however, middle cerebral artery (MCA) tortuosity remains understudied. We investigated the association of MCA tortuosity with radiographic and functional outcome using quantitative and qualitative measures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The ARISE II study (Analysis of Revascularization in Ischemic Stroke With EmboTrap) was used to identify patients with anterior circulation stroke. MCA tortuosity was calculated using the Inflection Count Metric by 2 readers blinded to the angiographic/clinical outcomes. The total cohort was trichotomized into 3 groups (A, B, and C) based on M1 tortuosity tertiles, with group A representing the lowest tertile and group C representing the highest tertile. The primary efficacy end point was the achievement of first-pass expanded Thrombolysis in Cerebral Ischemia reperfusion ≥2c. A good functional outcome was defined as a 90-day modified Rankin Scale score of 0 to 2. Baseline and procedural data were compared between groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 168 patients with M1 or M2 occlusion and measurable MCA tortuosity were identified. Patients in group C were more likely to have renal disease and hyperlipidemia, whereas patients in group A were more likely to have hypertension (<i>P</i><0.05). There were no significant differences in the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score at presentation or the Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score between groups. First-pass effect was more likely in group A than in groups B and C (51.8% versus 37.5% and 26.8%, respectively; <i>P</i>=0.024). The rate of final expanded Thrombolysis in Cerebral Ischemia reperfusion ≥2c was higher in group A (87.5%) versus in groups B and C (77.8% and 66%, respectively; <i>P</i>=0.026); achieving modified Rankin Scale score of 0 to 2 was more likely in group A (77.8%) versus in groups B and C (74.5% and 52.7%, respectively; <i>P</i>=0.008). There were no differences in distal emboli or symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage. First-pass effect and angiographic outcomes were consistent with standard angle of curvature tortuosity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with higher MCA tortuosity were less likely to achieve first-pass effect, successful reperfusion, and good functional outcome at 90 days postmechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>URL: http://clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02488915.</p>","PeriodicalId":74875,"journal":{"name":"Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.)","volume":"6 5","pages":"e002247"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13549569/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/SVIN.125.002247","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The impact of internal carotid artery tortuosity on achieving first-pass effect in mechanical thrombectomy has been described; however, middle cerebral artery (MCA) tortuosity remains understudied. We investigated the association of MCA tortuosity with radiographic and functional outcome using quantitative and qualitative measures.

Methods: The ARISE II study (Analysis of Revascularization in Ischemic Stroke With EmboTrap) was used to identify patients with anterior circulation stroke. MCA tortuosity was calculated using the Inflection Count Metric by 2 readers blinded to the angiographic/clinical outcomes. The total cohort was trichotomized into 3 groups (A, B, and C) based on M1 tortuosity tertiles, with group A representing the lowest tertile and group C representing the highest tertile. The primary efficacy end point was the achievement of first-pass expanded Thrombolysis in Cerebral Ischemia reperfusion ≥2c. A good functional outcome was defined as a 90-day modified Rankin Scale score of 0 to 2. Baseline and procedural data were compared between groups.

Results: A total of 168 patients with M1 or M2 occlusion and measurable MCA tortuosity were identified. Patients in group C were more likely to have renal disease and hyperlipidemia, whereas patients in group A were more likely to have hypertension (P<0.05). There were no significant differences in the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score at presentation or the Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score between groups. First-pass effect was more likely in group A than in groups B and C (51.8% versus 37.5% and 26.8%, respectively; P=0.024). The rate of final expanded Thrombolysis in Cerebral Ischemia reperfusion ≥2c was higher in group A (87.5%) versus in groups B and C (77.8% and 66%, respectively; P=0.026); achieving modified Rankin Scale score of 0 to 2 was more likely in group A (77.8%) versus in groups B and C (74.5% and 52.7%, respectively; P=0.008). There were no differences in distal emboli or symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage. First-pass effect and angiographic outcomes were consistent with standard angle of curvature tortuosity.

Conclusions: Patients with higher MCA tortuosity were less likely to achieve first-pass effect, successful reperfusion, and good functional outcome at 90 days postmechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke.

Registration: URL: http://clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02488915.

潜水MCA与首过效应:来自ARISE II研究的亚组分析。
背景:已有研究描述了颈内动脉扭曲对机械取栓术中首过效果的影响;然而,大脑中动脉(MCA)扭曲仍未得到充分研究。我们用定量和定性的方法研究了MCA弯曲与影像学和功能预后的关系。方法:采用ARISE II研究(缺血性卒中栓塞血运重建分析)识别前循环卒中患者。2名不知道血管造影/临床结果的阅读者使用弯曲计数法计算MCA弯曲度。根据M1扭曲度三分型分为A、B、C三组,A组为最低三分型,C组为最高三分型。主要疗效终点是在脑缺血再灌注≥2c时实现首次扩大溶栓。良好的功能结果定义为90天的修正Rankin量表得分在0到2之间。比较两组间的基线和程序数据。结果:共发现168例M1或M2闭塞和可测量的MCA弯曲。C组患者更容易发生肾脏疾病和高脂血症,而A组患者更容易发生高血压(PP=0.024)。≥2c脑缺血再灌注时,A组最终扩大溶栓率为87.5%,高于B、C组(分别为77.8%和66%,P=0.026);A组达到改良Rankin量表0 ~ 2分的可能性(77.8%)高于B组和C组(分别为74.5%和52.7%,P=0.008)。在远端栓塞或症状性颅内出血方面没有差异。首过效应和血管造影结果与标准弯曲角度一致。结论:急性缺血性卒中机械取栓后90天,MCA曲度较高的患者获得首过效应、再灌注成功和良好功能结局的可能性较小。注册:网址:http://clinicaltrials.gov;唯一标识符:NCT02488915。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书