Early Reperfusion in Basilar Artery Occlusion Stroke Managed With Tenecteplase Versus Alteplase Before Endovascular Treatment.

IF 3.1 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.) Pub Date : 2026-08-21 eCollection Date: 2026-09-01 DOI:10.1161/SVIN.126.002392
Dylan N Wolman, Rahul R Karamchandani, Kwadwo Darko, Tyler M Bielinski, Nitin Goyal, Jeremy B Rhoten, Mahesh V Jayaraman, Christian T Sidebottom, Bradley A Gross, Alhamza R Al-Bayati, Mohamed F Doheim, Matthew K Tobin, Anoop Chinthala, Avi Gajjar, Justin Mascitelli, Matthew R Webb, Jan-Karl Burkhardt, Kyle W Scott, Visish Srinivasan, Daniel Tonetti, Manisha Koneru, David J Altschul, Dhrumhil Vaishnav, Sumeet Multani, Thana Theofanis, William J Ares, Je Yeong Sone, Ramin Zand, Sasan Bahrami, Jiang Li, Gary Defilipp, Dale Strong, Radmehr Torabi, Krisztina Moldovan, Clemens M Schirmer, Raul G Nogueira, Bradley N Bohnstedt, Alexandra R Paul, Philipp Hendrix
{"title":"Early Reperfusion in Basilar Artery Occlusion Stroke Managed With Tenecteplase Versus Alteplase Before Endovascular Treatment.","authors":"Dylan N Wolman, Rahul R Karamchandani, Kwadwo Darko, Tyler M Bielinski, Nitin Goyal, Jeremy B Rhoten, Mahesh V Jayaraman, Christian T Sidebottom, Bradley A Gross, Alhamza R Al-Bayati, Mohamed F Doheim, Matthew K Tobin, Anoop Chinthala, Avi Gajjar, Justin Mascitelli, Matthew R Webb, Jan-Karl Burkhardt, Kyle W Scott, Visish Srinivasan, Daniel Tonetti, Manisha Koneru, David J Altschul, Dhrumhil Vaishnav, Sumeet Multani, Thana Theofanis, William J Ares, Je Yeong Sone, Ramin Zand, Sasan Bahrami, Jiang Li, Gary Defilipp, Dale Strong, Radmehr Torabi, Krisztina Moldovan, Clemens M Schirmer, Raul G Nogueira, Bradley N Bohnstedt, Alexandra R Paul, Philipp Hendrix","doi":"10.1161/SVIN.126.002392","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Timely reperfusion is a critical determinant of favorable outcomes in basilar artery occlusion (BAO) stroke. We aimed to examine whether the choice of thrombolytic agent predicts early reperfusion (ER) in BAO stroke managed with tenecteplase versus alteplase before endovascular treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective, multicenter US cohort of consecutive patients with BAO from 14 stroke centers treated with tenecteplase or alteplase within 4.5 hours of last known well before endovascular treatment. The primary end point was ER, defined as angiographic ER (expanded Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction grade 2b to 3 on the first diagnostic angiogram), or clinical ER, defined as substantial neurological improvement precluding endovascular treatment and a good functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale score 0-3).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 163 patients with BAO and a median last known well-to-needle time of 135 minutes (interquartile range, 100-193) and last known well-to-puncture time of 228 minutes (interquartile range, 166-307), ER was observed in 27 (16.6%) patients. Rates of ER were comparable between tenecteplase (14/75, 18.7%) and alteplase (13/88, 14.8%; adjusted odds ratio, 1.082 [95% CI, 0.444-2.631]; <i>P</i>=0.862). In addition, rates of angiographic ER and clinical ER subgroups did not differ between thrombolytic agents. Higher Basilar Artery on Computed Tomography Angiography scores and a nonatherothrombotic cause independently predicted ER. In multivariable analysis, a good functional outcome was associated with younger age, lower stroke burden, and shorter last known well-to-puncture time.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In BAO treated within 4.5 hours of last known well, tenecteplase and alteplase produced comparable early reperfusion rates. Achieving ER did not modify the association between thrombolytic agent and good functional outcome, consistent with rapid thrombectomy in patients with no ER.</p>","PeriodicalId":74875,"journal":{"name":"Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.)","volume":"6 5","pages":"e002392"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13549654/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/SVIN.126.002392","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Timely reperfusion is a critical determinant of favorable outcomes in basilar artery occlusion (BAO) stroke. We aimed to examine whether the choice of thrombolytic agent predicts early reperfusion (ER) in BAO stroke managed with tenecteplase versus alteplase before endovascular treatment.

Methods: This was a retrospective, multicenter US cohort of consecutive patients with BAO from 14 stroke centers treated with tenecteplase or alteplase within 4.5 hours of last known well before endovascular treatment. The primary end point was ER, defined as angiographic ER (expanded Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction grade 2b to 3 on the first diagnostic angiogram), or clinical ER, defined as substantial neurological improvement precluding endovascular treatment and a good functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale score 0-3).

Results: Among 163 patients with BAO and a median last known well-to-needle time of 135 minutes (interquartile range, 100-193) and last known well-to-puncture time of 228 minutes (interquartile range, 166-307), ER was observed in 27 (16.6%) patients. Rates of ER were comparable between tenecteplase (14/75, 18.7%) and alteplase (13/88, 14.8%; adjusted odds ratio, 1.082 [95% CI, 0.444-2.631]; P=0.862). In addition, rates of angiographic ER and clinical ER subgroups did not differ between thrombolytic agents. Higher Basilar Artery on Computed Tomography Angiography scores and a nonatherothrombotic cause independently predicted ER. In multivariable analysis, a good functional outcome was associated with younger age, lower stroke burden, and shorter last known well-to-puncture time.

Conclusions: In BAO treated within 4.5 hours of last known well, tenecteplase and alteplase produced comparable early reperfusion rates. Achieving ER did not modify the association between thrombolytic agent and good functional outcome, consistent with rapid thrombectomy in patients with no ER.

血管内治疗前用替奈普酶与阿替普酶治疗基底动脉闭塞性卒中的早期再灌注。
背景:及时的再灌注是基底动脉闭塞(BAO)卒中预后的关键决定因素。我们的目的是研究溶栓药物的选择是否能预测血管内治疗前使用替奈普酶和阿替普酶治疗的BAO脑卒中的早期再灌注(ER)。方法:这是一项回顾性的美国多中心队列研究,来自14个卒中中心的连续BAO患者在血管内治疗前最后已知的4.5小时内接受替奈普酶或阿替普酶治疗。主要终点是内质网,定义为血管造影内质网(首次诊断血管造影时脑梗死扩大溶栓等级为2b至3),或临床内质网,定义为排除血管内治疗的实质性神经系统改善和良好的功能结局(修正Rankin量表评分0-3)。结果:163例BAO患者中,已知最后到针头时间中位数为135分钟(四分位数范围100-193),最后到针头时间中位数为228分钟(四分位数范围166-307),27例(16.6%)患者出现ER。替奈替普酶(14/75,18.7%)和阿替普酶(13/88,14.8%)的ER发生率具有可比性;校正优势比为1.082 [95% CI, 0.444-2.631]; P=0.862)。此外,血管造影ER和临床ER亚组的比率在溶栓药物之间没有差异。颅底动脉计算机断层血管造影评分较高和非动脉粥样硬化性血栓形成原因独立预测ER。在多变量分析中,良好的功能预后与较年轻的年龄、较低的卒中负担和较短的最后已知穿刺时间相关。结论:在最后已知的4.5小时内治疗的BAO中,替奈普酶和阿替普酶产生相似的早期再灌注率。获得内源性雌激素并没有改变溶栓剂与良好功能预后之间的关系,这与无内源性雌激素患者的快速取栓一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书