Enhancing the cognitive, psychological, and social outcomes of adults undergoing surgery for focal drug-resistant epilepsy: protocol for a scoping review.

IF 2.6 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
BMJ Neurology Open Pub Date : 2026-09-03 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1136/bmjno-2026-001616
Evelyn E Harvey, Honor Coleman, Deepa Bapat, Gloria Brigiari, Francesco Brigo, Sarah Brown, Sean M D Carnegie, Dario Englot, Michael W K Fong, Heather M Francis, Isabella Hogan, Nathalie Jetté, Andres Kanner, Aileen McGonigal, Bryce P Mulligan, Didier Vincent Oxenham, Piero Perucca, Sarah J Wilson
{"title":"Enhancing the cognitive, psychological, and social outcomes of adults undergoing surgery for focal drug-resistant epilepsy: protocol for a scoping review.","authors":"Evelyn E Harvey, Honor Coleman, Deepa Bapat, Gloria Brigiari, Francesco Brigo, Sarah Brown, Sean M D Carnegie, Dario Englot, Michael W K Fong, Heather M Francis, Isabella Hogan, Nathalie Jetté, Andres Kanner, Aileen McGonigal, Bryce P Mulligan, Didier Vincent Oxenham, Piero Perucca, Sarah J Wilson","doi":"10.1136/bmjno-2026-001616","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Achieving seizure control remains a primary objective of epilepsy surgery but other important patient-centred outcomes should not be overlooked. Despite the need for more holistic approaches supporting well-being over and above seizure control, scant empirical research has identified effective interventions aimed at improving adults' cognitive, psychological, and/or social outcomes following epilepsy surgery. This novel scoping review will be the first to map the evidence in this landscape.</p><p><strong>Methods and analysis: </strong>The review will be conducted with reference to the Joanna Briggs Institute Manual for Evidence Synthesis and reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines. Databases searched will include MEDLINE, Embase, and CINAHL. Interventions of interest may be delivered preoperatively and/or postoperatively, and primary outcomes will be specific to cognitive, psychological, and social functioning after either resective or ablative epilepsy surgery conducted in adulthood. No limitations will be imposed on publication date, language, or country/region of origin. Selection will be based on title and abstract examination followed by full-text review. Data will be charted in duplicate and the results of descriptive and qualitative analyses will be presented using tabular and graphical formats, along with a narrative summary of the findings.</p><p><strong>Ethics and dissemination: </strong>Ethics approval is not required for this review. The final review will be submitted for peer review in a medical journal and considered for dissemination via the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE). This review is intended as a first step towards informing the development of ILAE consensus-based recommendations on enhancing cognitive, psychological, and social outcomes after epilepsy surgery in adulthood.</p>","PeriodicalId":52754,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Neurology Open","volume":"8 2","pages":"e001616"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13548225/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Neurology Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjno-2026-001616","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Achieving seizure control remains a primary objective of epilepsy surgery but other important patient-centred outcomes should not be overlooked. Despite the need for more holistic approaches supporting well-being over and above seizure control, scant empirical research has identified effective interventions aimed at improving adults' cognitive, psychological, and/or social outcomes following epilepsy surgery. This novel scoping review will be the first to map the evidence in this landscape.

Methods and analysis: The review will be conducted with reference to the Joanna Briggs Institute Manual for Evidence Synthesis and reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines. Databases searched will include MEDLINE, Embase, and CINAHL. Interventions of interest may be delivered preoperatively and/or postoperatively, and primary outcomes will be specific to cognitive, psychological, and social functioning after either resective or ablative epilepsy surgery conducted in adulthood. No limitations will be imposed on publication date, language, or country/region of origin. Selection will be based on title and abstract examination followed by full-text review. Data will be charted in duplicate and the results of descriptive and qualitative analyses will be presented using tabular and graphical formats, along with a narrative summary of the findings.

Ethics and dissemination: Ethics approval is not required for this review. The final review will be submitted for peer review in a medical journal and considered for dissemination via the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE). This review is intended as a first step towards informing the development of ILAE consensus-based recommendations on enhancing cognitive, psychological, and social outcomes after epilepsy surgery in adulthood.

增强接受局灶性耐药癫痫手术的成人的认知、心理和社会结果:范围审查方案
实现癫痫控制仍然是癫痫手术的主要目标,但其他重要的以患者为中心的结果不应被忽视。尽管需要更全面的方法来支持癫痫发作控制之外的福祉,但很少有实证研究确定了旨在改善癫痫手术后成人认知、心理和/或社会结果的有效干预措施。这项新颖的范围审查将是第一个在这一领域绘制证据地图的研究。方法和分析:本综述参照乔安娜布里格斯研究所证据综合手册进行,并按照系统评价和荟萃分析扩展范围评价(PRISMA-ScR)指南的首选报告项目进行报告。检索的数据库包括MEDLINE、Embase和CINAHL。干预措施可以在术前和/或术后实施,主要结果将具体到成人切除或消融癫痫手术后的认知、心理和社会功能。对出版日期、语言或原产国家/地区没有限制。选择将基于标题和摘要审查,然后是全文审查。数据将一式两份制成图表,描述性和定性分析的结果将采用表格和图形格式,连同调查结果的叙述性摘要一起提出。伦理和传播:本综述不需要伦理批准。最终审稿将提交给医学杂志同行评议,并考虑通过国际抗癫痫联盟(ILAE)传播。本综述旨在为制定基于ILAE共识的建议提供信息,以提高成人癫痫手术后的认知、心理和社会结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Neurology Open
BMJ Neurology Open Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
3.70%
发文量
46
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书