Venous dimension of shock: Integrating arterial inflow and venous back-pressure in hemodynamic assessment.

Sahil Kataria, Saketh Vinjamuri, Deven Juneja, Sargam Goel
{"title":"Venous dimension of shock: Integrating arterial inflow and venous back-pressure in hemodynamic assessment.","authors":"Sahil Kataria, Saketh Vinjamuri, Deven Juneja, Sargam Goel","doi":"10.5492/wjccm.122632","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Critical care hemodynamics has long been centered on arterial pressure, cardiac output, and systemic vascular resistance. While these variables remain fundamental, organ perfusion is determined not only by arterial inflow but also by the pressure opposing venous outflow at the microcirculatory level. Emerging clinical and physiological evidence indicates that elevated venous pressure may contribute to organ dysfunction even when arterial pressure appears adequate. Effective organ perfusion reflects the balance between arterial driving pressure and venous outflow pressure, further modified by microcirculatory factors such as capillary density, flow heterogeneity, and cellular oxygen utilization, which are usually inferred at the bedside rather than directly measured. Consequently, abnormal tissue perfusion may arise from reduced arterial inflow, elevated venous pressure, microcirculatory dysfunction, or a combination of these mechanisms. In this narrative review, we present the arterial-venous perfusion gradient as a pragmatic clinical synthesis that reintegrates established venous physiology into bedside hemodynamic interpretation. The review examines the physiological determinants of venous return, the consequences of venous congestion for organ function, and the clinical conditions in which elevated venous pressure contributes to organ injury. Particular attention is given to the effects of venous congestion on renal, hepatic, splanchnic, cerebral, and right-heart function, alongside bedside tools for evaluating venous hemodynamics, including point-of-care ultrasound, venous Doppler assessment, and ultrasound-based congestion scoring. We also propose a phenotype-based bedside approach for integrating arterial pressure, forward flow, venous congestion, and tissue perfusion during shock assessment and management. Recognizing discordant hemodynamic states may help clinicians identify patients whose organ dysfunction stems from elevated venous back-pressure or persistent microcirculatory impairment, rather than from impaired arterial inflow alone.</p>","PeriodicalId":66959,"journal":{"name":"世界危重病急救学杂志(英文版)","volume":"15 3","pages":"122632"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13548155/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"世界危重病急救学杂志(英文版)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5492/wjccm.122632","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Critical care hemodynamics has long been centered on arterial pressure, cardiac output, and systemic vascular resistance. While these variables remain fundamental, organ perfusion is determined not only by arterial inflow but also by the pressure opposing venous outflow at the microcirculatory level. Emerging clinical and physiological evidence indicates that elevated venous pressure may contribute to organ dysfunction even when arterial pressure appears adequate. Effective organ perfusion reflects the balance between arterial driving pressure and venous outflow pressure, further modified by microcirculatory factors such as capillary density, flow heterogeneity, and cellular oxygen utilization, which are usually inferred at the bedside rather than directly measured. Consequently, abnormal tissue perfusion may arise from reduced arterial inflow, elevated venous pressure, microcirculatory dysfunction, or a combination of these mechanisms. In this narrative review, we present the arterial-venous perfusion gradient as a pragmatic clinical synthesis that reintegrates established venous physiology into bedside hemodynamic interpretation. The review examines the physiological determinants of venous return, the consequences of venous congestion for organ function, and the clinical conditions in which elevated venous pressure contributes to organ injury. Particular attention is given to the effects of venous congestion on renal, hepatic, splanchnic, cerebral, and right-heart function, alongside bedside tools for evaluating venous hemodynamics, including point-of-care ultrasound, venous Doppler assessment, and ultrasound-based congestion scoring. We also propose a phenotype-based bedside approach for integrating arterial pressure, forward flow, venous congestion, and tissue perfusion during shock assessment and management. Recognizing discordant hemodynamic states may help clinicians identify patients whose organ dysfunction stems from elevated venous back-pressure or persistent microcirculatory impairment, rather than from impaired arterial inflow alone.

休克的静脉尺寸:在血流动力学评估中整合动脉流入和静脉背压。
长期以来,重症监护血流动力学一直以动脉压、心输出量和全身血管阻力为中心。虽然这些变量仍然是基本的,但器官灌注不仅由动脉流入决定,还由微循环水平上与静脉流出相反的压力决定。越来越多的临床和生理证据表明,即使动脉压足够,静脉压升高也可能导致器官功能障碍。有效器官灌注反映了动脉驱动压和静脉流出压之间的平衡,并进一步受到毛细血管密度、血流异质性和细胞氧利用等微循环因素的修饰,这些因素通常在床边推断而不是直接测量。因此,组织灌注异常可能由动脉流入减少、静脉压升高、微循环功能障碍或这些机制的组合引起。在这篇叙述性的综述中,我们提出了动静脉灌注梯度作为一个实用的临床综合,重新整合建立静脉生理学到床边血流动力学的解释。这篇综述探讨了静脉回流的生理决定因素,静脉充血对器官功能的影响,以及静脉压升高导致器官损伤的临床情况。特别关注静脉充血对肾脏、肝脏、内脏、大脑和右心功能的影响,以及床边评估静脉血流动力学的工具,包括即时超声、静脉多普勒评估和基于超声的充血评分。我们还提出了一种基于表型的床边方法,在休克评估和管理过程中整合动脉压、前流、静脉充血和组织灌注。认识到不一致的血流动力学状态可以帮助临床医生识别由静脉背压升高或持续微循环损伤引起的器官功能障碍患者,而不是单纯由动脉流入受损引起的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
216
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书