Socioeconomic disparities in sarcoma diagnosis, expert center access, and advocacy group awareness: a multicenter study in Southern Europe.

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Oncologist Pub Date : 2026-09-09 DOI:10.1093/oncolo/oyag358
Pau Mascaró-Baselga, Víctor Navarro, Ana Sebio, Rosa Álvarez, Sara Carvalho, María Ángeles Sala-González, Gloria Marquina, Javier Martínez-Trufero, Juana María Cano, Andrés Redondo, Aurea Molina-Díaz, Diego Gomez-Puerto, Carlo María Cicala, Miguel Henriques-Abreu, Claudia Valverde, Guillermo Villacampa, César Serrano
{"title":"Socioeconomic disparities in sarcoma diagnosis, expert center access, and advocacy group awareness: a multicenter study in Southern Europe.","authors":"Pau Mascaró-Baselga, Víctor Navarro, Ana Sebio, Rosa Álvarez, Sara Carvalho, María Ángeles Sala-González, Gloria Marquina, Javier Martínez-Trufero, Juana María Cano, Andrés Redondo, Aurea Molina-Díaz, Diego Gomez-Puerto, Carlo María Cicala, Miguel Henriques-Abreu, Claudia Valverde, Guillermo Villacampa, César Serrano","doi":"10.1093/oncolo/oyag358","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Management of sarcoma in expert centers (SECs) improves outcomes, and patient advocacy groups provide information, support, and representation of patients' needs; however, access to both remains uneven. We aimed to identify factors associated with patient referral and advocacy group awareness in Spain and Portugal, 2 universal healthcare systems with distinct sarcoma pathways.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Between April and December 2023, we conducted a survey-based study of adults with sarcoma under active treatment or follow-up across 9 Spanish hospitals (5 SECs) and one Portuguese hospital. Sociodemographic and clinical data, referral patterns, and advocacy group awareness/contact were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 415 patients were included (Spain, n = 365; Portugal, n = 50). In Spain, lower income (odds ratio [OR] 2.38; 95% CI, 1.16-5.03) was associated with longer diagnostic delays. Rural residence (OR 3.48; 1.79-7.04) and longer diagnostic delays (OR 2.41; 1.26-4.66) were associated with referral to other hospitals. Cancer advocacy group awareness was lower among patients with lower income (OR 0.38; 0.17-0.81) and higher with longer diagnostic delays (OR 2.08; 1.05-4.25). Sarcoma-specific advocacy group awareness was generally low (20%) but higher with university education (OR 4.27; 1.56-12.35). Few patients contacted cancer (14%) or sarcoma-specific groups (7%); contact was more frequent with longer diagnostic delays (OR 2.27; 1.11-4.63) or symptomatic presentation (OR 2.50; 1.04-5.97). Compared with the Portuguese cohort, Spanish patients were referred less frequently and had greater awareness of advocacy groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Socioeconomic disparities affect sarcoma diagnosis, referral, and advocacy group engagement, even within universal healthcare systems. Equity-oriented care requires timely SEC referral and advocacy group visibility.</p>","PeriodicalId":54686,"journal":{"name":"Oncologist","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13587828/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncologist","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oncolo/oyag358","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Management of sarcoma in expert centers (SECs) improves outcomes, and patient advocacy groups provide information, support, and representation of patients' needs; however, access to both remains uneven. We aimed to identify factors associated with patient referral and advocacy group awareness in Spain and Portugal, 2 universal healthcare systems with distinct sarcoma pathways.

Materials and methods: Between April and December 2023, we conducted a survey-based study of adults with sarcoma under active treatment or follow-up across 9 Spanish hospitals (5 SECs) and one Portuguese hospital. Sociodemographic and clinical data, referral patterns, and advocacy group awareness/contact were analyzed.

Results: A total of 415 patients were included (Spain, n = 365; Portugal, n = 50). In Spain, lower income (odds ratio [OR] 2.38; 95% CI, 1.16-5.03) was associated with longer diagnostic delays. Rural residence (OR 3.48; 1.79-7.04) and longer diagnostic delays (OR 2.41; 1.26-4.66) were associated with referral to other hospitals. Cancer advocacy group awareness was lower among patients with lower income (OR 0.38; 0.17-0.81) and higher with longer diagnostic delays (OR 2.08; 1.05-4.25). Sarcoma-specific advocacy group awareness was generally low (20%) but higher with university education (OR 4.27; 1.56-12.35). Few patients contacted cancer (14%) or sarcoma-specific groups (7%); contact was more frequent with longer diagnostic delays (OR 2.27; 1.11-4.63) or symptomatic presentation (OR 2.50; 1.04-5.97). Compared with the Portuguese cohort, Spanish patients were referred less frequently and had greater awareness of advocacy groups.

Conclusion: Socioeconomic disparities affect sarcoma diagnosis, referral, and advocacy group engagement, even within universal healthcare systems. Equity-oriented care requires timely SEC referral and advocacy group visibility.

肉瘤诊断的社会经济差异、专家中心准入和倡导团体意识:南欧的一项多中心研究。
背景:专家中心(SECs)对肉瘤的管理改善了结果,患者倡导团体提供了信息、支持和患者需求的代表;然而,获得这两种服务的机会仍然不均衡。我们的目的是确定与西班牙和葡萄牙患者转诊和倡导团体意识相关的因素,这两个普遍的医疗保健系统具有不同的肉瘤途径。材料和方法:在2023年4月至12月期间,我们在9家西班牙医院(5家SECs)和1家葡萄牙医院进行了一项基于调查的成人肉瘤积极治疗或随访研究。分析了社会人口统计学和临床数据、转诊模式和倡导团体的认识/接触。结果:纳入415例患者(西班牙365例;葡萄牙50例)。在西班牙,较低的收入(OR 2.38; 95% CI, 1.16-5.03)与较长的诊断延迟相关。农村居民(OR 3.48; 1.79-7.04)和较长的诊断延误(OR 2.41; 1.26-4.66)与转诊到其他医院相关。收入越低的患者癌症倡导团体意识越低(OR为0.38;0.17-0.81),诊断延迟越长的患者癌症倡导团体意识越高(OR为2.08;1.05-4.25)。肉瘤特异性宣传组的意识普遍较低(20%),但大学教育程度较高(OR 4.27; 1.56-12.35)。很少有患者接触癌症(14%)或肉瘤特异性组(7%);接触更频繁,诊断延迟时间更长(OR 2.27; 1.11-4.63)或有症状表现(OR 2.50; 1.04-5.97)。与葡萄牙队列相比,西班牙患者的转诊频率较低,并且对倡导团体的认识更高。结论:社会经济差异影响肉瘤的诊断、转诊和倡导团体参与,甚至在全民医疗保健系统内也是如此。以股票为导向的护理需要及时的SEC转诊和倡导团体的知名度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Oncologist
Oncologist 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
309
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Oncologist® is dedicated to translating the latest research developments into the best multidimensional care for cancer patients. Thus, The Oncologist is committed to helping physicians excel in this ever-expanding environment through the publication of timely reviews, original studies, and commentaries on important developments. We believe that the practice of oncology requires both an understanding of a range of disciplines encompassing basic science related to cancer, translational research, and clinical practice, but also the socioeconomic and psychosocial factors that determine access to care and quality of life and function following cancer treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书