Efficacy and Safety of Savolitinib Plus Osimertinib in EGFR-Mutant, MET-Aberrant Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Eshal Amir, Muhammad W Khan, Muhammad S Mannan, Syed M Rayyan, Muhammad A H Khan, Hammad Saif, Hunain Shahbaz, Syed M Hussain, Hamayel Khan, Muhammad Shahzaib, Mueed Iqbal, Ahmed Javed
{"title":"Efficacy and Safety of Savolitinib Plus Osimertinib in EGFR-Mutant, MET-Aberrant Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Eshal Amir, Muhammad W Khan, Muhammad S Mannan, Syed M Rayyan, Muhammad A H Khan, Hammad Saif, Hunain Shahbaz, Syed M Hussain, Hamayel Khan, Muhammad Shahzaib, Mueed Iqbal, Ahmed Javed","doi":"10.1097/COC.0000000000001367","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>NSCLC is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality. While combined therapy including savolitinib and osimertinib appears promising, there exists a lack of comprehensive pooled evidence regarding its anti-oncological activity.</p><p><p>The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of combined therapy in patients with NSCLC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive literature search was conducted in MEDLINE, the Cochrane Central Register of controlled trials, and ClinicalTrials.gov. Randomized controlled trials and prospective single-arm studies evaluating savolitinib combined with osimertinib were included. A random-effects single-arm meta-analysis of proportions was performed using logit transformation and inverse variance weighting, with restricted maximum likelihood (REML) estimation and Knapp-Hartung adjustment. Results were reported with a 95% CI, and heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic. Sensitivity analysis was conducted using the Freeman-Tukey transformation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The primary analysis included 4 post-TKI, MET-selected combination cohorts (SACHI, SAVANNAH, and TATTON Part B; n=338) from 7 reports of 5 trials after de-duplication of overlapping data sets. First-line (FLOWERS) and MET-unselected (Yoh) cohorts were analyzed separately. The pooled objective response rate (ORR) was 53.9% (95% CI: 45.1-62.4), disease control rate (DCR) was 85.2% (79.2-89.8), 6-month progression-free survival (PFS) rate was 59.8%, and grade ≥3 adverse events occurred in 48.8% of patients. ORR estimates were consistent across studies and remained robust across sensitivity and subgroup analyses.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Combined therapy shows encouraging results in selected MET, post-TKI NSCLC. However, reliance on single-arm data warrants further randomized controlled trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":50812,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Clinical Trials","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Clinical Trials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/COC.0000000000001367","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: NSCLC is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality. While combined therapy including savolitinib and osimertinib appears promising, there exists a lack of comprehensive pooled evidence regarding its anti-oncological activity.

The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of combined therapy in patients with NSCLC.

Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted in MEDLINE, the Cochrane Central Register of controlled trials, and ClinicalTrials.gov. Randomized controlled trials and prospective single-arm studies evaluating savolitinib combined with osimertinib were included. A random-effects single-arm meta-analysis of proportions was performed using logit transformation and inverse variance weighting, with restricted maximum likelihood (REML) estimation and Knapp-Hartung adjustment. Results were reported with a 95% CI, and heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic. Sensitivity analysis was conducted using the Freeman-Tukey transformation.

Results: The primary analysis included 4 post-TKI, MET-selected combination cohorts (SACHI, SAVANNAH, and TATTON Part B; n=338) from 7 reports of 5 trials after de-duplication of overlapping data sets. First-line (FLOWERS) and MET-unselected (Yoh) cohorts were analyzed separately. The pooled objective response rate (ORR) was 53.9% (95% CI: 45.1-62.4), disease control rate (DCR) was 85.2% (79.2-89.8), 6-month progression-free survival (PFS) rate was 59.8%, and grade ≥3 adverse events occurred in 48.8% of patients. ORR estimates were consistent across studies and remained robust across sensitivity and subgroup analyses.

Conclusions: Combined therapy shows encouraging results in selected MET, post-TKI NSCLC. However, reliance on single-arm data warrants further randomized controlled trials.

萨沃替尼联合奥西替尼治疗egfr突变、met异常的晚期非小细胞肺癌的疗效和安全性:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。
目的:非小细胞肺癌是癌症相关死亡的主要原因。虽然包括萨沃替尼和奥西替尼的联合治疗看起来很有希望,但缺乏关于其抗肿瘤活性的综合证据。本研究的目的是评估联合治疗非小细胞肺癌患者的疗效和安全性。方法:在MEDLINE、Cochrane中央对照试验注册库和ClinicalTrials.gov中进行全面的文献检索。随机对照试验和前瞻性单臂研究评估萨伐利替尼联合奥西替尼。采用logit变换和方差逆加权进行随机效应单臂比例荟萃分析,采用有限最大似然(REML)估计和Knapp-Hartung调整。结果以95% CI报告,并使用I2统计量评估异质性。采用Freeman-Tukey变换进行敏感性分析。结果:主要分析包括4个tki后、met选择的联合队列(SACHI、SAVANNAH和TATTON B部分;n=338),来自重叠数据集去重复后的5项试验的7份报告。一线(FLOWERS)和met -未选择(Yoh)队列分别进行分析。合并客观缓解率(ORR)为53.9% (95% CI: 45.1-62.4),疾病控制率(DCR)为85.2%(79.2-89.8),6个月无进展生存率(PFS)为59.8%,发生≥3级不良事件的患者占48.8%。所有研究的ORR估计值是一致的,并且在敏感性和亚组分析中保持稳健。结论:联合治疗在选定的MET、tki后NSCLC中显示出令人鼓舞的结果。然而,对单臂数据的依赖需要进一步的随机对照试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
130
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​​​American Journal of Clinical Oncology is a multidisciplinary journal for cancer surgeons, radiation oncologists, medical oncologists, GYN oncologists, and pediatric oncologists. The emphasis of AJCO is on combined modality multidisciplinary loco-regional management of cancer. The journal also gives emphasis to translational research, outcome studies, and cost utility analyses, and includes opinion pieces and review articles. The editorial board includes a large number of distinguished surgeons, radiation oncologists, medical oncologists, GYN oncologists, pediatric oncologists, and others who are internationally recognized for expertise in their fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书