Tandem Lesion Strokes: To Stent or Not to Stent, Insights From a Decade of Experience at a Comprehensive Stroke Center in Argentina.

IF 3.1 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.) Pub Date : 2026-07-08 eCollection Date: 2026-09-01 DOI:10.1161/SVIN.126.002337
Julieta Rosales, Alejandro González-Aquines, Nicolás Pérez, Manuel Chasco, Matías Lopez, Juan Cirio, Carlos Bleise, Iván Lylyk, María Julieta Russo, Pedro Lylyk
{"title":"Tandem Lesion Strokes: To Stent or Not to Stent, Insights From a Decade of Experience at a Comprehensive Stroke Center in Argentina.","authors":"Julieta Rosales, Alejandro González-Aquines, Nicolás Pérez, Manuel Chasco, Matías Lopez, Juan Cirio, Carlos Bleise, Iván Lylyk, María Julieta Russo, Pedro Lylyk","doi":"10.1161/SVIN.126.002337","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Tandem lesion strokes, defined by the coexistence of an intracranial large- or medium-vessel occlusion and a cervical internal carotid artery stenosis or occlusion, represent a challenging subtype of acute ischemic stroke. Optimal endovascular management remains controversial, particularly regarding the role of emergent carotid artery stenting (eCAS) during mechanical thrombectomy (MT). We aim to compare the safety and efficacy of eCAS versus MT alone in patients with anterior circulation tandem lesion strokes treated at a comprehensive stroke center.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective observational cohort study of consecutive adult patients with anterior circulation tandem lesion strokes treated with MT within 24 hours of symptom onset between January 2015 and July 2025. Patients were categorized according to treatment strategy: eCAS performed during thrombectomy or MT alone. The primary efficacy outcome was the ordinal shift in the 90-day modified Rankin Scale score. Secondary efficacy outcomes included excellent outcome (modified Rankin Scale score of 0-1), functional independence (modified Rankin Scale score of 0-2) at 90 days, and successful recanalization (Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score ≥2b). Primary safety outcomes included symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, in-hospital mortality, and 90-day mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 111 patients were included (mean age, 71.2±12.6 years; 68.5% male), of whom 74 (67%) underwent eCAS, and 37 (33%) received MT alone. Ordinal logistic regression demonstrated a nonsignificant trend toward better functional outcomes with eCAS. This subgroup achieved higher rates of successful recanalization (97.3% versus 78.4%; odds ratio, 13.26 [95% CI, 2.13-82.49]; <i>P</i>=0.006) and excellent functional outcomes at 90 days (41.9% versus 12.5%; odds ratio, 6.80 [95% CI, 1.35-34.20]; <i>P</i>=0.020). Rates of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, early neurological deterioration, and mortality did not differ significantly between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this single-center experience, emergent eCAS was associated with higher reperfusion rates and improved functional outcomes, without an increased risk of symptomatic hemorrhage or mortality. Prospective randomized controlled trials are warranted to establish standardized management guidelines for this complex stroke subtype.</p>","PeriodicalId":74875,"journal":{"name":"Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.)","volume":"6 5","pages":"e002337"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13549509/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/SVIN.126.002337","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Tandem lesion strokes, defined by the coexistence of an intracranial large- or medium-vessel occlusion and a cervical internal carotid artery stenosis or occlusion, represent a challenging subtype of acute ischemic stroke. Optimal endovascular management remains controversial, particularly regarding the role of emergent carotid artery stenting (eCAS) during mechanical thrombectomy (MT). We aim to compare the safety and efficacy of eCAS versus MT alone in patients with anterior circulation tandem lesion strokes treated at a comprehensive stroke center.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective observational cohort study of consecutive adult patients with anterior circulation tandem lesion strokes treated with MT within 24 hours of symptom onset between January 2015 and July 2025. Patients were categorized according to treatment strategy: eCAS performed during thrombectomy or MT alone. The primary efficacy outcome was the ordinal shift in the 90-day modified Rankin Scale score. Secondary efficacy outcomes included excellent outcome (modified Rankin Scale score of 0-1), functional independence (modified Rankin Scale score of 0-2) at 90 days, and successful recanalization (Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score ≥2b). Primary safety outcomes included symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, in-hospital mortality, and 90-day mortality.

Results: A total of 111 patients were included (mean age, 71.2±12.6 years; 68.5% male), of whom 74 (67%) underwent eCAS, and 37 (33%) received MT alone. Ordinal logistic regression demonstrated a nonsignificant trend toward better functional outcomes with eCAS. This subgroup achieved higher rates of successful recanalization (97.3% versus 78.4%; odds ratio, 13.26 [95% CI, 2.13-82.49]; P=0.006) and excellent functional outcomes at 90 days (41.9% versus 12.5%; odds ratio, 6.80 [95% CI, 1.35-34.20]; P=0.020). Rates of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, early neurological deterioration, and mortality did not differ significantly between groups.

Conclusions: In this single-center experience, emergent eCAS was associated with higher reperfusion rates and improved functional outcomes, without an increased risk of symptomatic hemorrhage or mortality. Prospective randomized controlled trials are warranted to establish standardized management guidelines for this complex stroke subtype.

串联病变卒中:支架还是不支架,阿根廷综合卒中中心十年经验的见解。
背景:串联性损伤性卒中,定义为颅内大血管或中血管闭塞和颈内动脉狭窄或闭塞共存,是急性缺血性卒中的一种具有挑战性的亚型。最佳血管内管理仍然存在争议,特别是关于机械取栓(MT)中紧急颈动脉支架(eCAS)的作用。我们的目的是比较eCAS与MT单独治疗在综合卒中中心治疗的前循环串联性损伤卒中患者的安全性和有效性。方法:我们对2015年1月至2025年7月症状出现24小时内连续接受MT治疗的成年前循环串联性损伤性卒中患者进行回顾性观察队列研究。根据治疗策略对患者进行分类:在取栓过程中进行eCAS或单独进行MT。主要疗效指标为90天修正兰金量表评分的顺序变化。次要疗效指标包括90天预后良好(改良Rankin量表评分0-1)、功能独立(改良Rankin量表评分0-2)、再通成功(脑梗死溶血栓评分≥2b)。主要安全结局包括症状性颅内出血、住院死亡率和90天死亡率。结果:共纳入111例患者(平均年龄71.2±12.6岁,男性68.5%),其中74例(67%)行eCAS, 37例(33%)单独行MT。有序逻辑回归显示,eCAS的功能预后改善趋势不显著。该亚组获得了更高的再通成功率(97.3%对78.4%;优势比为13.26 [95% CI, 2.13-82.49]; P=0.006)和90天的良好功能结局(41.9%对12.5%;优势比为6.80 [95% CI, 1.35-34.20]; P=0.020)。症状性颅内出血、早期神经功能恶化和死亡率在两组间无显著差异。结论:在这个单中心研究中,急诊eCAS与更高的再灌注率和改善的功能结局相关,没有增加症状性出血或死亡的风险。前瞻性随机对照试验有必要为这种复杂的脑卒中亚型建立标准化的管理指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书