Predicting 30-day readmission after heart failure hospitalization using interpretable machine learning: evidence from a 20-year population-based rural registry.

IF 3.1 4区 医学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Jorge Maese-Calvo, Alicia Paredes-Calderón, Mercedes Nunez-Bayon, José Carlos Arévalo-Lorido, Nadia Mayoral-Testón, Carlos Nevado-Nogales, María José Zaro-Bastanzuri, Reyes González-Fernández, Nuria Hernández-Rollán, Javier Corral-García, Juan Antonio Rico-Gallego, Daniel Fernández-Bergés
{"title":"Predicting 30-day readmission after heart failure hospitalization using interpretable machine learning: evidence from a 20-year population-based rural registry.","authors":"Jorge Maese-Calvo, Alicia Paredes-Calderón, Mercedes Nunez-Bayon, José Carlos Arévalo-Lorido, Nadia Mayoral-Testón, Carlos Nevado-Nogales, María José Zaro-Bastanzuri, Reyes González-Fernández, Nuria Hernández-Rollán, Javier Corral-García, Juan Antonio Rico-Gallego, Daniel Fernández-Bergés","doi":"10.1007/s11517-026-03657-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Readmissions after heart failure hospitalization are common, costly, and potentially preventable, but discharge risk stratification remains challenging, particularly in rural health systems with constrained resources. We aimed to develop an interpretable artificial intelligence approach to estimate individual 30-day all-cause readmission risk using routinely collected variables. We analyzed nearly 5,000 heart failure admissions from a non-public regional Spanish registry representing a rural healthcare setting (2000-2019; 8.2% readmitted within 30 days) and not previously used for artificial intelligence modeling. Three machine learning models -random forest, extreme gradient boosting, and support vector machine- were trained, validated, and compared with binary logistic regression. SHAP quantified predictor contributions and assessed the direction and consistency of their effects. Random forest showed the best performance (AUC 0.812, 95% CI 0.744-0.867), outperforming binary logistic regression (AUC 0.686, 95% CI 0.617-0.755). The most influential predictors were admission period, renal dysfunction markers, prior heart failure, age, and length of stay. Interpretable machine learning improved 30-day readmission risk stratification using routine data and provided transparent explanations that could support targeted post-discharge interventions. External validation and prospective impact evaluation are required before clinical implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":49840,"journal":{"name":"Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-026-03657-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Readmissions after heart failure hospitalization are common, costly, and potentially preventable, but discharge risk stratification remains challenging, particularly in rural health systems with constrained resources. We aimed to develop an interpretable artificial intelligence approach to estimate individual 30-day all-cause readmission risk using routinely collected variables. We analyzed nearly 5,000 heart failure admissions from a non-public regional Spanish registry representing a rural healthcare setting (2000-2019; 8.2% readmitted within 30 days) and not previously used for artificial intelligence modeling. Three machine learning models -random forest, extreme gradient boosting, and support vector machine- were trained, validated, and compared with binary logistic regression. SHAP quantified predictor contributions and assessed the direction and consistency of their effects. Random forest showed the best performance (AUC 0.812, 95% CI 0.744-0.867), outperforming binary logistic regression (AUC 0.686, 95% CI 0.617-0.755). The most influential predictors were admission period, renal dysfunction markers, prior heart failure, age, and length of stay. Interpretable machine learning improved 30-day readmission risk stratification using routine data and provided transparent explanations that could support targeted post-discharge interventions. External validation and prospective impact evaluation are required before clinical implementation.

使用可解释性机器学习预测心力衰竭住院后30天再入院:来自20年基于人口的农村登记的证据
心力衰竭住院后再入院很常见,费用昂贵,而且有可能预防,但出院风险分层仍然具有挑战性,特别是在资源有限的农村卫生系统中。我们的目标是开发一种可解释的人工智能方法,利用常规收集的变量来估计个人30天的全因再入院风险。我们分析了来自西班牙一个非公共区域注册中心的近5000例心力衰竭患者,这些注册中心代表了农村医疗机构(2000-2019年;8.2%的患者在30天内重新入院),以前没有用于人工智能建模。三种机器学习模型——随机森林、极端梯度增强和支持向量机——被训练、验证,并与二元逻辑回归进行比较。SHAP量化了预测因子的贡献,并评估了其影响的方向和一致性。随机森林表现最佳(AUC 0.812, 95% CI 0.744 ~ 0.867),优于二元logistic回归(AUC 0.686, 95% CI 0.617 ~ 0.755)。最具影响的预测因素是入院时间、肾功能障碍指标、既往心力衰竭、年龄和住院时间。可解释的机器学习利用常规数据改进了30天再入院风险分层,并提供了透明的解释,可以支持有针对性的出院后干预措施。临床实施前需要外部验证和前瞻性影响评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing
Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
3.10%
发文量
249
审稿时长
3.5 months
期刊介绍: Founded in 1963, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing (MBEC) continues to serve the biomedical engineering community, covering the entire spectrum of biomedical and clinical engineering. The journal presents exciting and vital experimental and theoretical developments in biomedical science and technology, and reports on advances in computer-based methodologies in these multidisciplinary subjects. The journal also incorporates new and evolving technologies including cellular engineering and molecular imaging. MBEC publishes original research articles as well as reviews and technical notes. Its Rapid Communications category focuses on material of immediate value to the readership, while the Controversies section provides a forum to exchange views on selected issues, stimulating a vigorous and informed debate in this exciting and high profile field. MBEC is an official journal of the International Federation of Medical and Biological Engineering (IFMBE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书